I believe one of the biggest problems that they face if the dog park is bulit will be the noise. As stated in the article the average dog bark can reach 75 decibels and large
I would certainly agree that a dog park is a beneficial addition to a community in which many residents own dogs. The particular benefits that such a public service offers should not, in my opinion, be dismissed.
One of the reasons that people are against a dog park is the barking. But for this I also have a solution. The park should have opening times. For Mondays to Fridays the park should be open from 7 or 8am until 9pm. Most of the people are awake during this time and they will not have any sleeping trouble. On weekends the park can be open from 10:30am to 10/11pm. Most of the time people are awake at this time of the day too. Also the dog park would be built more outside a city and not downtown. There is no difference between the sound of a car (the horn) or the sound of a dog who is barking.
Public dog parks have proven to improve the health of the animals, decrease dog-related attacks, and increase the population in the surrounding area of the dog park. While concerns over the comfort of the surrounding residents comes into question, many of those issues may be resolved with appropriate laws set into place. For these reasons, I believe builing a public dog park would be a positive addition to the
Before you jump to the hasty conclusion that I’m opposed to a dog park because I do not have a dog, let me assure you I do have a dog and am aware of my responsibilities as an owner. The principal argument for a dog park is “exercise is important to dogs’ mental and physical health.” I would take this argument a step further and state exercise is also
According to one article '' That 37% of americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing for a place to live''. With dog parks everyone would benefit. Without a place to take dogs they may never socialize much and can become aggresive.Though a good point can be made that dog parks can be loud at times. I still believe that dog parks are needed.
The town has a scarce amount of public space for recreation so I believe that when things are created they should equally serve all the towns people. The town already has a very low amount of public goods and for the goods that are available they're too pricey for everyone to attend. I feel that it would be a good idea to make a dog park, but they should also split it into two and make another park that's usable for the towns people and children. That way nobody will feel left out and they can make the best use of the small public space availability. Also the local schools would be very close to the dog park so the children could make use of the park if it was for both pets and
Residents in the area will also have to deal with the exsive noise and unneeded trafic. With a dog park also comes barking. This means dogs barking and owners
Building a dog park will be a very costly project that will impact the public, which in turn can raise taxes. This impact will not go well with taxpayers, especially, with the economy steady raising taxes for other city projects and needs.
In the first passage " A Dog Park Benefits All", they are stating their opinion for a need for a dog park. Stating that rental units make up at least 68 percent of the cities residents. Leaving them with little to no private yard space to accomodate pet owners needs. Also they state that lack of exercise and socialization negatively effects dogs.
Statistics show that 37% of Americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing a place to live. On the other hand, some people believe that a dog park would not be a good idea for the city, and that it would just be a burden for taxpayers and a lawsuit waiting to happen. Some cities require a owner to obtain and display permits to have a dog off-leash at the dog park, but most people do not do so. Most cities rely on the people respecting the parks' rules. Which means if a dog attacks another dog or person, the victim can legally sue the owner and the city for not enforcing the law. That's why I think everyone should obey the parks' rules or the community should better plan a park so everything goes smooth for everyone. Some people also believe it would be a burden by increasing the traffic and the noise in the area. But think about it for your dog, he or she would be much happier to have a fun day at the dog park. With all that said, I think it's a great idea to bring a dog park to Muscatine, IA. Let's do it for the dogs so we can all be a happy family at the end of the
Public dog parks should be built in every city in the US. People with dog should know that a dog that is will exercise well be more friendly. In the passage its says that "dogs that dont get exercise can act out by barking and destroying things". this explains alot because you would want to walk in to your home with friends/family while your dog is destroying eveything. Now if the dog reguly exrcised the dog wouldnt do that at all.
When it comes to this issue both sides of the argument are well considerd in my perception. Being a very indecisive person it takes me alot of mental effort to figure out what it is that i want, That beig said the most reason solution comes down to data and statistics. Atleast in my opinion the side with the most beneficial data is the one that triumphs the opposing side; in response i suppose the benefit of a dog park can be a positive thing and a negative entity depending on the mental perspective that it inflicts on other individiual's and the economy.
I feel very strongly about the opinions expressed in both these articles.My opinion on the subject matter is that i disagree with the opinion that dogs"shouldn't"have a park to exercise,as stated in paragraph 5;"37% of americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing where to live."Which in my opinion will help with the financial
After reading both passages carefully, I think if you have a dog park in a community city it will benefit people. People that have a dog cannot have a lot of fun with their pet dog, and there is no safe place they can go. If you take your dog to a regular park there is a greater chance of someone getting injured or your dog getting injured. On the passage it says that dog bites whent from 40,000 to fewer than 4,000 per year. If humans get to have their own park then animals should have there own park as well. A dog park can raise property value in their community. Exercise is important for dogs it helps them in health and having a longer life. Dont us humans need exercise in are lifes to be healthy, and to live longer. Why should it be diffrent