Research Paper On Feminization Of Poverty

Even though Barbara Ehrenreich does not specifically talk about the feminization of poverty, her experience in Nickeled and Dimed teaches us about the feminization of poverty in that she offers compelling evidence that women tend to be more likely than their male counterparts to be poor in the United States, mainly due to oppression and discrimination of women in the workplace as a result of stereotypical belief that they cannot handle some tasks. Barbara’s experience also teaches us about gender stereotypes within the

poverty, is told in Paycheck to Paycheck and it representatives the lives of many other women

The article focuses on the “feminization of poverty”, in which women are disproportionally living in poverty. This emerged from social and economic patterns that subject women to inequality. There is a significant relationship linking poverty to mental health and violence. Women

The phrase or term "Feminization of Poverty" was coined by an American sociologist Dianna Pearle in the late 1970s. The term describes the growing trend of an increasing number of poor, single women head of household living in poverty. Feminization of poverty is the growing trend where the majority of the population living in poverty in the U S are women. Women are vulnerable to be living in poverty because they are more likely to bear the economic cost of caring for the children as head of the household. Added to this, women are paid less than men when they are employed with the same qualification doing the same job. In fact, according to Wiltz, T. (2015) in 2014, women working full time were paid 79 cents for every dollar men were paid, a

In the United States today, women are far more likely than men to have lived below the poverty line at some point in their lives. One in seven women are living in poverty today, with the number hovering right around 14.7% compared to 10.9% of men (NWLC, 2015). It is undeniable that that is a serious wage gap in the United States with women making cents to every dollar that a man makes for the same work, and on top of that women are often working lower paying “pink-collar” jobs in the first place; for women of color, wages are even lower. Compound these problems with factors such as domestic violence, children, and lack of healthcare and you can begin to see how dire of a situation women living below the poverty line find themselves in. As an

Women and poverty is one of the critical areas of concern from the Beijing Platform for Action. Unfortunately there is over 1 billion of who are women that are living in poverty. Most of the women who are living in poverty and in very poor condition are from developing countries, but we also have this problem here in the United States. Poverty has been a factor of little to no education, single mother raising their families, little resources, and pay gap. In the article of Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, Fourth World Conference on Women, one of the strategic objectives is, to analyze from a gender perspective, policies and programmers including those related to macroeconomic stability, structural adjustment, external debt problems,

Evidence in the Women in America report, published by the White House in 2013, show that women in the United States are more likely to live in poverty than men. This happens because of two main reasons. First, women who work earn lower wages than men. They are paid 77 cents for every dollar a man earns. Therefore, their families have fewer incomes and their challenges in making ends meet increase. In 2009, women earned approximately 75% of what men earned and 28% of women who were employed had incomes which were below the poverty level, which was $ 17.285. Second, they still maintain their traditional role as households and spend time caring for their husbands and children instead of working.

Poverty is a significant threat to women’s equality. In Canada, more women live in poverty than men, and women’s experience of poverty can be harsher, and more prolonged. Women are often left to bear more burden of poverty, leading to ‘Feminization of poverty’. Through government policy women inequality has resulted in more women and children being left in poverty with no means of escaping. This paper will identify some key aspects of poverty for Canadian women. First, by identifying what poverty entails for Canadian women, and who is more likely to feel the brunt of it. Secondly the discussion of why women become more susceptible to poverty through government policy and programs. Followed by the effects that poverty on women plays in

This view is supported by the distribution of salaries; examples of this are managerial positions in large companies where women get paid less for the same job and numerous other industries. Another good example relates to the view that social inequalities are built into society, there are more women that are reliant on the state pension, which is 20% less than men's, this is because women were unable to go out and work when they were younger because they were expected to stay at home to look after their children and have therefore been unable to contribute to a pension, this demonstrates the in-built inequalities in society. Glendinning, Millar and Townsend have identified, through research, the 'feminisation of poverty', whereby the poor are made up of more women than men. Feminists will also argue that the benefit system has assumed that women are dependent upon men and this means the welfare state functions to maintain

The term “feminization of poverty” was first created in 1978 in an article that analyzed the economic statuses of women. “In 1976, nearly two out of three of poor persons over 16 years of age were women” (Pearce; 1976). The feminization of poverty describes a phenomenon in which women represent a disproportionate percentage of the United States poor. This trend is not only a result of lack of income, but also a lack of opportunities due to gender biases and fixed gender roles in some societies (DeNavas-Walt; 2012). Gender biases often deprive women of opportunities to independently pursue education or careers and are often linked to the expectation that women are responsible for childbearing and caring for them as well. To better

The goal of this paper is to describe and analyze gender inequality, focusing on the history of feminist ideas. I will start with a basic overview of the entire feminist movement, and will then analyze feminism more specifically. In this analysis I will focus on the different types of feminism. Most notably of these types will be the main groups that consist of socialist feminists, liberal feminists, and radical feminists. I will describe the goals and ideals of these groups along with describing how a functionalist and conflict theorist looks at gender.

Feminization of Poverty It is the term given to the trend where women represent a disproportionate percentage of the world poor. Here are many factors that contribute to this trend. The factors that got my attention was being a single mother or just being a female. Often now days society claims to give woman the same right as man. But in real life woman do not get the same right as a man. A woman can get to the same position a man is but the struggle and the effort would be bigger.

Poverty also means lack of educational and professional opportunities and shortage in legitimate employment opportunities meaning that only a few will be able to work. Those who are fortunate enough to work are usually men, which leaves women with even less opportunities and extreme vulnerability thus providing even bigger targets on their backs to predators.

Feminization of poverty is defined as, “A societal-level process over time in which the poor are increasingly made up of women and children” (Eshleman, 2010, p. 588). According to Lauren Abbate of Mount Holyoke College, “Feminization of poverty is the phenomenon in which women experience poverty at rates that are disproportionately high in comparison to men” (Abbate, 2010). It appears that,

Poverty has increasingly become a noticeable issue worldwide over the past couple of decades. With the middle class steadily decreasing, considerable amounts of people are becoming part of the lower class, and even more of our world’s population are beginning to live in poverty. It is important to understand there are different definitions of poverty, and that is largely determined by what each country’s government determines as the cut off of poverty, otherwise known as the ‘poverty line’. Although some people could live above the poverty line, and still be struggling financially, it goes unrecognized by most research collection. However, what was initially noticed around the 1970’s is that there was a significant rise in women’s poverty statistics. More female-headed households were living in poverty, and a majority of those women belonged to a minority. This recognizable trend has been deemed the ‘feminization of poverty’, which according research is not only a growing problem in North America, but several other countries around the world. Information gathered about this issue in the United States shows that female-headed households is by far the fastest growing type of family structure, and due to the fact there is a growing poverty level amongst this group, it now means that approximately half of the all the poor in the United States live in a women-headed family and household. (Gimenez, 1999, p. 336) The biggest question when is comes to this particular topic is why?