Research Paper On Kantianism

It has one further category of action, the superogatory: actions that are morally good but not obligatory for they are over and above the requirements of duty. One of the main problems with this theory is the possible clash of duties that such a rigid system of rules will inevitably entail, when applied to the real world. However, there is some merit in the adoption of universal regulations covering, for example, health and safety of employees, and employee rights, in businesses internationally. The Kantian deontological position also suggests that people should be treated "with respect and as ends in their own right, not solely as means to other's ends." (Legge, 1998) However, in a profit-motivated system such as a business organisation, even a highly enlightened one, it is difficult not to perceive workers as a means to a profitable end.

First, all individuals do have a duty to what is right, whether they act accordingly or not. All citizens are held to a duty to uphold the laws, if there was no duty then laws would not exist. Morality coincides with being loyal to the laws, being a disciplined person, and living an orderly life. These essentials are all present in Kant’s perception of duty.

There is very little question as to what action a strict deontologist would do in the scenario for this assignment he or she would unequivocally adhere to his or her duty. The more pressing question, of course, revolves around just where that duty lies. For a deontologist, that duty would lie with the job at hand and its responsibilities. As one who took an oath to only program software in accordance to the company that he or she works for which is essentially operating as an extension of the government that wishes the programmer to 'push the button' and destroy millions of innocent lives in World War II it would strongly appear that such an individuals would consider it his or her duty to effectively start World War III.

Immanuel Kant was born in what is now Germany in 1724 and died in 1804 and was the type of philosopher to act out of duty. He believes that actions should be performed out of duty alone, in other words he thinks that all actions should be impartial. To act out of duty is to follow the categorical imperative. There are three forms of the categorical imperative: You should do what would be morally required of anyone in your situation, an objective and impartial duty; it is natural to do these duties; do not use others or let yourself be used. For Kant the categorical imperative is represented as “an action as objectively necessary of itself, without reference to another end.”(Kant 353). Kant’s ethical point of view is known as deontological ethics.

Society, as we know it, is only possible through humans acting in accordance with a universal moral code. Because we as humans are rational beings and have free choice, we can make our own decisions, can hold ourselves to a standard that we ourselves set, and can act in accordance with our standards, as well as set standards for our own society. However, these standards must be held, otherwise they hold no meaning. Kant uses a black and white tactic, in order to determine which actions are moral and immoral. However, Kant’s downfall is his strength. The black and white tactic makes everything very clear, but it lacks the complexity needed to handle more sophisticated problems and decisions. Black and white does not take into account all the shades of gray between, and Kant needs to take into account all the shades of factors that impact human decision-making.

From a Kantian perspective, providing reparation to blacks addresses the past wrongs of slavery and gives financial support to a long time disadvantaged group. To further explain, human beings are born free and anything that violates this freedom goes against moral laws and categorical imperatives; two important factors associated with the concept of freedom. Slavery violates freedom and was used as a means to an end; making it morally wrong. Reparation corrects this action by establishing financial equality for all members of society. With this stated, Kantian supports reparation.

In Immanuel Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, the theory of ethics is majorly based on acting according to duty. From this thought he created The Categorical Imperative; “act always according to that maxim whose universality as a law you can at the same time will. This is the only condition in which a will can never be in conflict with itself, and such an imperative is categorical.” (42) Basically, morality is needed to choose “right” over “the pleasing.” From this, there are two formulations of the categorical imperative; the universalization of one’s principles, and to treat everyone as an end and rather than a means. Failing to act according to reason can lead to an inconsistency of the will in one or more of the following

This theory states that the power to do what is morally correct and just is within each and every one of us. However, this theory also states that some actions may be wrong even though these actions may have resulted in positive or wanted outcomes. Kant strongly advocated that individuals make decisions or actions based on concrete evidence and not let themselves be guided by human emotions. Why? Because human emotions are entirely unreliable and can lead individuals to make irrational decisions. In essence, Kantian Duty-Based Ethics would support the notion that the individual not be tortured . . . even if saving this individual would cost thousands or millions of

Duty-based ethics are based on duty or obligation. Kant argues that there are higher principles that are good in no matter the time, situation, or culture. Therefore, when faced with

Interesting case you brought up as discrimination is always a sensitive topic so understanding that while it might not be discrimination based on the definition it still is not ethical. I also enjoyed your response about how you would question her ethics by including Kant's theory on ethics. I took a philosophy class freshman year so I think it is interesting how it makes its way back to a core business class it really shows how big a part ethics play in the business world.

Duty for Kant is the underlying role of morality. Our duty and intentions combine to form our will, and the only one thing in the world that is good is a good will. To act according to duty means we are acting according to principals, not according to the final outcome of our actions. Principals is another important factor in this theory, our actions must be congruent with principals that can be made universal. To be universal, the maxim must apply to absolutely everyone, everywhere, and anytime. Another stipulation in Kant’s theory is that we should never treat a person solely as a means to our own ends. It is morally wrong to use someone solely to enhance our own self-interest.

Kantian ethics states that one should do the right thing because it is the moral thing to do.

Kant believes that we must “act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” (Grounding, 421) This one and only categorical imperative is the starting principle of all other imperatives of duty. In relation to these imperatives, duties to others are derived from our own duties to ourselves. Initially, Kant introduces both perfect and imperfect duties to oneself and to others, which ultimately follow the categorical imperative.

“There is no possibility of thinking of anything at all in this world, or even out of it, which can be regarded as good without qualifications, except a good will.” (Kant, pg.7 393). No other thing that may appear good can be unqualifiedly good, as even “Talents of the mind…Gifts of power…[Other] qualities…Have no intrinsic unconditional worth, but they always presuppose, rather, a good will, which restricts the high esteem in which they are otherwise rightly held.” (Kant, pg.7 393-394). So Immanuel Kant introduces the public to his Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, which results not in simply a grounding work, but one that is utterly groundbreaking. This opener, wholly devoted to the establishment of the importance of will and intention, notes the guiding characteristics of a good will. As enumerated previously, Kant recognizes the plausible potential positivity of plenty concepts, but remains of the mind that none of these are good in themselves without the efforts of a good will to guide and restrict them in a manner that perpetuates their positivity.

Kantian ethics emphasizes on two conditions for an action to be morally good. The first, that an action only has moral worth if it is done for the sake of duty. The second is that an action is considered right if its maxim can be willed as a universal law. Kantian ethics then is working on the basis of duty and universality. In failing to recognize the multiple aspects of morality, Kantian ethics shows inadequacy as a moral theory. (Hinman, 2008)