Research Paper On Middle Child Syndrome

He describes it as, “knowledge that is tested by practice within a community” (Conquergood 377). The accomplishment behind the performance of being a middle child is that middle children are, as stated above, seen as the invisible glue. They value love and acceptance and try to convey this message of community. Although the role of being a middle child is thrusted upon them and don’t know the reaction or the end result of this performance, majority of the time it works out in their favor, as they become more community oriented yet, independent. They help create this community and use their skills as a younger, yet older sibling to help look at things from different perspectives. Being a middle child, not only helps the individual grow as an independent individual but, also helps those within the community grow. They show the meaning of togetherness to help promote community. They do this through their low self-esteem days, where they joined different communities to find a sense of belonging, this include extracurricular at school. These different activities helped them create their definition of what community meant. The discourse being sent across is the idea of self-growth through performance that is predetermined based on birth order. Although, there are stereotypes for each birth order, the middle child is the one most talked about and is seen as the most extreme. The idea of “middle child syndrome” is just like every other pseudo syndrome that is transferred through knowing, and has been carried through different cultures. This goes to show that although it seems like it is a bad thing the end results usually turn out to be for the

Each child has his or her own personality. Typically the firstborn is a natural leader, while the last is always the baby, but what about the overlooked middle child? The middle child can sometimes feel lost in the crowd when it comes to family dynamics. They crave their parent’s attention and are willing to do anything to believe they have it, but immediately close up when it comes to conflict, they become people pleasers. They will do anything to make their parents, or others, happy. This makes the middle child a skilled peacemaker and negotiator (Varma, 2013). They are amazing listeners because of the fact they hate conflict,

Whitbourne explains the stereotypes surrounding sibling roles, such as the first-born is most likely to take on the leadership position, and tend to “stick to rules and order, and strive toward achievement

I am a middle child. I am not the assertive, naturally confident first-born, nor am I an attention-seeking youngest child; I am the quiet, quintessential middle child. For the first 16 years of my life, I was always an afterthought to the craziness of my two sisters, and I loved it‒ it made me independent and self-reliant. I have always been very comfortable being the easy-going child, happily accepting anything that comes my way. Never have I felt that my parents loved me any less; they merely had to worry less about me than they did my siblings, with their stubbornness and constant desire for affirmation. I easily slid under the radar, preferring to mind my own business and handle problems on my own. There was never anything wrong with my

M. Farouk Radwan, MSc., notes that first-born children who are used to getting all of the attention until the second child arrives may develop feelings of jealousy because they blame their younger sibling for their dethronement. If properly developed, the first born can acquire positive qualities like strong leadership traits and being responsible. However, poor development can lead older siblings to manifest jealousy or

Sibling rivalry is not the only issue that was triggered by birth order, child’s personality and his or her intelligence is also involved. Some researchers say that first-borns are smarter because they are pressured to set-up the boundary for the younger siblings. They are more enthusiastic in their education for them to be role models of their other siblings. As for the younger ones, life may be or may not be easy, depending on how they will view it. They may view it positively by keeping in mind that since their older sibling get through it, they also can. Otherwise,

First born children who later have younger siblings may have it the worst. These children are given excessive attention and pampering by their parents until that fateful day when the little brother or sister arrives. Suddenly they are no longer the center of attention and fall into the shadows wondering why everything changed. They are left feeling inferior, questioning their importance in the family, and trying desperately to gain back the attention they suddenly lost. The first born child can become “problem children, neurotics, criminals, drunkards, and perverts” (Cloninger, 2008). However, on the flip side, the first born usually are the peacemakers of the family even though they are a pampered and spoiled child.

Most people might say that middle children are the “go getters in the world”. One might even be able argue that it’s fact, using famous middle children Bill Gates, Princess Diana, and Martin Luther King Jr as clear examples. While one Weber State student may not have invented a software program, be part of the royal family, or play a major role in the civil rights movement, she definitely fits the description of a “go getter” middle child.

The oldest child plays an inimitable role in the structure of her family. She has a propensity to be confident and often craves her independence at an early age. She sets the standard for her younger siblings and realizes that her actions are observed closely by impressionable eyes. This accountability often instills in her a drive to act in a respectable and responsible manner. As the oldest child in a family of eight, I have been persistent in regarding these characteristics and have enabled them to shape my identity.

I suffer from First Born Syndrome. It is my place in the birth order that has influenced my actions and sent me on my journey toward a career that maybe, just maybe, I am born to do.

Being the third children always had an impact on how I felt growing up. My older brother was smart and naturally received a lot of attention since he was the first child. My sister has been diagnosed with an autoimmune disease which constantly requires a lot of attention from my parents. As I got older, I had to find a way to differentiate myself. Besides my schoolwork, the only way that I could stand out was to play a sport. Being able to play the sport nicknamed “The Game of Failure” changed my perception on how to react to life. No matter how many times I failed, I kept going.

In home, they should know what is the significant and important to their parents and siblings before they locate their own specialty in the family and make a spot for themselves. According to Romeo, there are no two people precisely similar, even identical twins are not exactly alike (1994). It means everyone is unique, and it is on the individual's mental advancement to interpret certain events or things. According to Alfred Adler, the birth order of each person provides an impact to his or her personality development. Each position of an individual in the family has diferent characteristics, attitudes and choice of interests. He stated that the eldest are socially dominant, highly intelectual, and extremely conscientious. However, they tend to be less open to new ideas, prone to the idea of perfectionism and often like to please people, as a result of losing of what they thought as undivided attention from both parents on their eraly age and striving hard to gain it back. The middle ones are flexible member of the family. They are often competitive because they feel the need to surpass their other sibling. The youngest according to the birth theory, tend to be dependent and selfish because they are used to theie parents providing everything for them. Lastly, the only child are coined as "spoiled" because they are

Even though youngest siblings always try to do what they can to not be compared to their siblings, being the youngest does not always have perks. We do not get as much attention like our older siblings do and we sometimes do not feel the same love the parents give to their first-born.

I grew up in a household with both parents and two sisters, one who is 3 years older than me and one who is a 5 years. This leaves me as the middle child, but I don’t have middle child syndrome. Every time I tell someone that I am the middle child the first thing they ask me is “ you have middle child syndrome?”. Of course, my answer is no, because I don’t even believe in such thing as a middle child

Middle childhood is defined a number of ways, but perhaps best defined as the ages 6 to 12 years of age or prepubescent to pubescence Middle childhood is a challenging time and a major challenge is social constructs, as this is the earliest time when children begin to move away from parental influences and establish more meaningful peer and other adult relationships. It signifies a new set of social contacts with adults and other children as well as a wider variety of settings than those that characterize early childhood. Children begin to see themselves as a part of a bigger whole. Peer influences can become more powerful than the adults in the children’s life and impact their sense of self. Grouping is established and teasing of others