Pierre Allan C. Villena English 10 X2- C
2012 – 53216 A.F. Sanchez
BS – IE Position Paper
False Conservation: Trophy Hunting is Killing and not Conservation
Trophy hunting is a method of “conservation” in which you save endangered species by killing some of them. This method of conservation is wrong since it opposes the very meaning of conservation. Conservation, defined by Abhay R. Joshi, is to protect the endangered animals as well as their habitats. Thus, by parallel reasoning trophy hunting is not conservation.
Environmental Impacts: Good or Bad?
Trophy hunting has a number of good impacts. First, hunters pay to be able to hunt these predators. These funds collected from trophy hunting are used for wildlife conservation projects which help increase the population of endangered species such as ponghorn, elk and turkey. Second, it helps to control overpopulated predators such as cougars, cayotes, bears and wolves in North America in which the government had spent millions to manage (25 Reasons Why Hunting Is Conservation). Furthermore, it also played a big part in
…show more content…
First, trophy hunting may be helpful in controlling overpopulated animals as stated previously in the paper but the way hunters hunt might affect these animals. A study conducted by David Coltman et al regarding the consequences of trophy hunting to the evolution of animals. The study showed that unmonitored trophy hunting causes undesirable evolution to species. An example would be the case of rams in North America in which hunter’s primary target are rams with good traits. Being the primary target of hunters, rams with good traits could not pass their traits because they are being killed at early age. This would lead to the deterioration of genetic quality of rams producing light rams with shorter horns (Coltman
Hunting is a common activity all around the world, and if performed properly, can have many benefits to us and the rest of the planet. The art of hunting has been around since the beginning of time. Living off of the land used to be a necessity across the world, until the mass production of food came along. In America, people do not usually need to hunt to survive. However, the population of animal species needs to be controlled. Too many of one type of animal can cause a drastic change to any ecosystem. Food supplies decline quickly, leaving many animals without food. Hunting can help keep the population of a group of animals at a good number, making the lives of the other
Big game trophy hunting is flat out one of the worst kind of violations you can commit as I personally see it. Knowing that humans kill animals just to show off or either claiming it as a "sport" is truly a sad situation going on. Big game trophy hunting should be banned because it is an inhumane and dangerous practice, they can possibly be killing endangered species, and wildlife populations immensely begin plummeting. Moreover what people must understand is that animals deserve to live just like us humans
Hunting has become a staple of American traditions since the beginning of the first hunter/gatherers, to the Native Americans who have lived in the U.S for millennia, even all the way until present day. Much of today’s society looks at hunting as a cruel activity when in reality it has more of a positive effect on the environment than it does harm. There are an abundance of benefits that come from hunting. Some of the benefits of hunting are: it is the biggest contribution to conserving wildlife, the meat is healthier than commercially produced meat, many jobs are being supported out of hunting, and every hunter wants “to bag” the trophy animal; however, there are a few cons to this, which include poaching and interference by the activist
This is because, one, simply put, in our modern day Society trophy hunting or hunting in general is not needed, to include endangered animals Within the game hunting will also affect their overall environment, and trophy hunting is overall an inhumane
Hunting is a common controversial issue among people. Determining when killing an animal is necessary and ethical has mixed viewpoints. One type of hunting that generally creates feelings of animosity among people is trophy hunting. There are very few ethical theories and ideas that support trophy hunting. Trophy hunting is a form of hunting in which the hunter kills an animal with the main goal of taking a part or parts of that animal for a trophy. The majority of trophy hunting occurs in Africa, with big game as the most popular trophies, but trophy hunting also applies to non-exotic species as well. In this paper, I will start with introducing a recent incident involving the killing of a popular African lion, then outlining the main ethical issues with trophy hunting. Next I will analyze the trophy hunting from an anthropocentric, biocentric, and ecocentric viewpoint, and finally I will propose a few solutions that would make trophy hunting a more ethical activity. Trophy hunting has been said to provide many benefits to conservation and preservation of species but is ethically lacking; with some stronger laws and regulations trophy hunting has the potential to be both ethically acceptable and beneficial to the environment.
On the other hand, trophy hunting, which is “the selective hunting of animals for human recreation” , is a problem that can increase the risk of extinction. UK scientists confirm that hunters have the tendency to hunt the animal with the best genes. There is an intense discussion about the rightness of this activity because some argue
"Sport" hunting is a violent form of recreation that has left countless animals maimed, and orphaned animals vulnerable to starvation, exposure, and predation. This activity disrupts natural animal population dynamics and has contributed to the extinction of animal species all over the world, including the Tasmanian tiger and the great auk.(1,2)
Big game hunting is cause A major population damage . One of them is one of the most beloved animals in the world the Elephant. Every year, tens of thousands of elephants are being killed for trophies . Their population in Africa dropped from 62,000 all the way down to 20,000 in the last decade. WWF Global said they are due to be extinct in the next decade if nothing is done to stop the big game hunter. It’s not just Africa, where animals are being killed for trophies. ‘In Canada there is a breed of leopards called Amurs that were driven down to 10 left in the whole world ‘’ What caused this big game hunters from all over came to hunt an
“The Facts About Hunting.” Friends of Animals And Their Benefits. Friends of Animals And Their Benefits, Web. 8 November 2013
The earliest case of humans hunting can be documented as far back as 2 million years proving it is completely natural for predators to kill for food or for clothing however in the past 100 years there's been a huge boom of Trophy Hunting. This type of recreational hunting has been substantially declining many species, as well taking money away from communities that need the income from tourism and does not in anyway provide clothing food or any other use than being a decorative souvenir “Since the 1940s, when lions numbered an estimated 450,000, lion populations have blinked out across the continent. Now they may total as few as 20,000 animals.” In the past 80 years there has been a dramatic decrease in the lion population. This is an animal that is not primarily eaten and had a large impact from trophy hunting. When a species has such few numbers the variation of their gene pool becomes less different which can cause animals to have birth defects or diseases that can kill entire prides. Trophy Hunting calls for the leaders of the pride to be killed so they have the best prize to take back for their wall or as a rug, which means that the next alpha
Advocators may attest that big game hunting controls animal population, however this is not accurate information because they fail to realize the excessive amounts of animals that are slaughtered by hunters. Pertinent to an article written by NLCATP.org, “Without the existence of hunting research shows that some animal species populations might grow to large numbers that are not ideal.” Even though this may reveal little truth, we must not be ignorant to the fact that hunting and “big game” hunting are two different activities. Big game hunting is usually
Trophy hunting is defined as the selective hunting of select species of hunting game for human recreation and not as a way to get food, even though parts of the animals may be consumed. The animal or part of it is kept as a trophy or proof of achievement. Trophy hunters have a code called the fair chase code, this code ensures that the hunter will give the animal they are hunting a fair chase and allow it to escape if the hunter does not have the skill required to kill the animal. By adopting this code the hunter also agrees to allowing the animal to use its senses in order to give the animal a fair chance at survival. The hunter also promises not to use illegal methods to hunt such as banned traps
Hunting was originally a resourceful activity and a necessity for survival. It was crucial to use the animal for food, clothes, and tools. With the exception of cultures who still depend on this method, there are many developed areas where this is not longer required. From the lack of needing to hunt animals for resources, sport hunting has emerged. This is the recreational act of killing animals to use as trophies. The problem with sport hunting is that it is an unnecessary and unreasonable activity that presents several dangers. In order to understand why, one must examine the effects it has on animals, humans, and the ecosystem. It is clear that sport hunting should have stricter regulations.
418 people out of 100,000 go to the emergency room for animal related injuries per year(statistia 2016). If we have trophy hunts we can reduce these numbers. Recently Cecil the lion was killed, he was shot by a hunter. He had all of the right permits and the lion went out of the protected area and was shot and the hunter had no idea was protected. Big game hunting laws should not change because it brings a lot of revenue to countries, it helps manage the animal populations and it keeps from hurting more people/animals.
Buzzle: Hunting Pros and Cons. Last but never least, sport hunting should be banned due to the fact that it causes the endanger and extinction of animal species. “One glaring negative of hunting for sport is over hunting. This occurs when hunters kill too many of a species, threatening their survival.” (Life123). Species become endangered when they are over hunted, and if hunters take it too far, the species will no longer exist. “…there are many animals that have been over-hunted and brought to near extinction, one example being the American Buffalo. Another example was the over-killing of the Cougar. Although this animal was hunted to protect cattle from being attacked, it led to this species nearly becoming extinct.” (Buzzle) The substandard thing about species becoming extinct is that they might not reappear until millions of years later. Imagine how long that would