Research Report On Emergency Management Essay

An emergency is sometimes used interchangeably with disaster, which is a state in which normal practices are put off, and extraordinary measures are taken to prevent a catastrophe. A disaster, on the other hand, is an incident upsetting the normal conditions of being and causing a level of suffering that surpasses the capacity of change to the affected community. Emergency management offers the institutional arrangement and conceptual basis to handle increasing complexity and uncertainty in the weather. As such, most sectors of society now integrate emergency management approaches and principles into their adaptation planning. Emergency managers should apply climate research data to focus emergency mitigation, preparedness, and response actions for their communities. However, immediate challenges that might prevail include preparing for frequent or heavy precipitation and flooding, more intense storms, droughts, heat waves and higher seal level.

Tragic events that cause damage to property and life may destroy the social, cultural and economic life of a community. Communities must be engaged in the various phases from prevention to recovery to build disaster resilient communities. In order to do this, there must be a disaster preparedness plan in place that involves multiple people in various roles.

Effective disaster management is highly important when it comes to assisting in rescue and relief to affected. This does not only include post disaster rescue efforts but these disaster management activities should be proactive. They start right from taking preventive measures before the disaster actually occurs and goes on till the effected people are resettled back in their lives. This disaster management pertaining to human life is not only associated with physical well being but also focuses on psychological, emotional, and spiritual rehabilitation.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would become the central point-of-contact within the national government in responding to incidents. Since formation in 1979, FEMA’s core missions were to enhance the government’s ability to survive a foreign attack, and to assist state and local authorities in disaster response (Carafano, 2005). And while the two core missions seem heterogenous in scope at times from an outside perspective, the biggest difference between the two tasks is duration. A man-made disaster may be over in a matter of minutes as compared to a hurricane lasting several days, but in both instances the road to recovery is long. In order to streamline response and recovery in either scenario, FEMA was reorganized with new directives to support comprehensive emergency management practices (CRS, 2006). Today, FEMA provides the standard approach and guidance that many local communities may not have due to funding, training, and

This chapter provides an overview that describes the basic types of hazards threatening the United States and provides definitions for some basic terms such as hazards, emergencies, and disasters. The chapter also provides a brief history of emergency management in the federal government and a general description of the current emergency management system—including the basic functions performed by local emergency managers. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the all-hazards approach and its implications for local emergency management.

Natural and man-made disasters have increased in the past decade, and due to these changes, Emergency Managers had to make drastic changes in order to improve the way first responders operate in a disaster area.

Make the case for retaining an all-hazards approach to emergency management that includes terrorism and its associated hazards as one of many hazards. Discuss the pros and cons of such an approach as it relates to all four phases of emergency management: Mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery An all all-hazards approach provides a basic framework for responding to a wide variety of hazards, it does not mean literally being prepared for everything.

In today’s world, emergencies of all types occur frequently. They include floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, landslides, tsunamis, infectious diseases, wildfires, anthrax threats, riots and civil disturbance, and terrorism, to name a few. There must be plans already in place to

What is also noteworthy is that the very commencement of the recovery phase is difficult to note, often times being the case for recovery to commence during or simultaneously with the stages of response. This further supports the previous theory of a cyclic nature of emergency management.

The burden of emergency management has grown great deal in the last few decades. We have seen an increase in natural disasters, a new threat of terrorism on our front door and an increase in manmade disasters. All of these have tested emergency management in a number of cities and towns across the nation. It is not always disasters that present problems for emergency managers. We have to look beyond our traditional view of emergency management of helping us during times of disasters and view what issues they consider may affect their emergency response. Issues that emergency management see that are moving into the critical area are issues of urbanization and hazard exposure, the rising costs of disaster recovery, and low priority of emergency management.

There are several phases in the emergency management of disasters. One is the recovery phase. McEntire (2015) defines the recovery phase as an “activity to return the affected community to pre-disaster, or, preferably, improved conditions.” The reason that the conditions should be improved is because emergency managers should study and learn

The number one goal for emergency management professional is to save lives and prevention the best way to save lives. Emergency management profession has identified actively pursuing mitigation programs as a means to do so. To fund mitigation, arguments need to be developed to persuade those who has authority to approve and release funding. The additional mitigation benefit are cost savings, one that is not realized until a disaster happens, and increased resiliency. These additional benefits is what sways the bureaucracy which looks at the cost verses benefits and cost savings; it is key to fund mitigation programs.

Emergency management systems range from informal arrangements of neighbors helping neighbors, typically found in rural areas, to complex and formal programs offered in larger cities or at higher levels of government. All players have the same goal to increase community and national resiliency, which requires collaboration of many parties from local citizens to the president. This section focuses on key actors that shape emergency management programs in reference to people with access and functional needs.

An emergency refers to an event out of the ordinary that call for quick response from staff and concerned persons to prevent further damaging occurrence. In the hospital, chosen there is an emergency response plan which considers an understanding of disaster and looks at the emergency procedure that is manageable at a local level ADDIN EN.CITE Lang1997337(Lang et al., 1997)33733717Lang, ThierryDavido, AlainDiakité, BakaryAgay, EmmanuelleViel, Jean FrançoisFlicoteaux, BernardUsing the Hospital Emergency Department as a Regular Source of CareEuropean Journal of EpidemiologyEuropean Journal of Epidemiology223-2281321997Springer03932990http://www.jstor.org/stable/3582014( HYPERLINK l "_ENREF_2" o "Lang, 1997 #337" Lang et al., 1997).

This subject aims to teach students the main elements of emergency management for natural disasters and to a lesser degree terrorist attack. Students will understand the principles involved in emergency