Resistance In A Free Society

Peaceful resistents to laws either positively or negatively impacts a free society. I believe that peaceful resistant to laws does positively impact a free society just look at Rosa Parks, Thomas Jefferson and also Daniel Ellsberg they all helped in some type of way by using peaceful resistance to the laws. In some ways civil disobedience does help the government get better and also some says that it destroys the civil society. From the article ,"Is it right to break the law" by Charles Frankel it discuss is it ever right to break the law and in some situations it is but it also depends on how you handle the situation and what your motives are. It depends on if you are harmimg someone and if your taking a stand and wanting to change something for the better. I do not believe that is showing negatively on society

In my opinion, peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. The whole point of a "free society" is where the people have a say and are able to stand up for what they believe in. If a law seems unjust to them, they should have the right to protest it or disobey it, as long as it is done peacefully. Martin Luther King is one of the most influential leaders in history. Without his non-violent protests and civil disobedience, the unjust laws of segregation might still be in place. One of my favorite quotes from MLK's "Letter From Birmingham Jail" is when

Peaceful resistance to laws has positively impacted a free society and will continue to in the future. Although there will always be minor issues involving group assemblies and beliefs, the positive impacts that they have outweigh the negatives. As in the past with Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr., and others, even though there were a few negative contributions to society, their positive contributions were able to help shape society for the better. Therefore, peaceful resistance to laws believed to be unjust does have a positive impact on a free society.

Peaceful resistance laws negatively impact a free society because it creates either non-peaceful protesting or violent actions because of the angry citizens who support what is being protested and so forth. It also causes unnecessary actions to be taken by police and perhaps new laws to prevent things like this. However, peaceful protesting does have an up-side. People are heard and do make a difference to change things, for example with Rosa Parks. Overall however, I believe it just causes more damage, angers more people, and makes society sad more often than it helps.

Resistance to laws positively impact a free society. The ability to resist and protest is a freedom in itself, and gives the government feedback from the American citizens. Without peaceful resistance, our government would not know what to change and people would get progressively more mad every day.

I believe that peaceful resistance to laws can positively impact a free society. As long as someone is not harming another person or groups of people while refusing to follow certain laws then they should be able to carry on. Sometimes what this person is refusing may be wrong, but they are still entitled to their opinions and beliefs. A famous boxer, Muhammad Ali, once refused to participate in the military draft of 1960 for the Vietnam War. His argument was, "Why should me and other so-called 'negroes' go 10,000 miles away from home, here in America, to drop bombs and bullets on other innocent brown people who's never bothered us and I will say directly: No I will not go" (Mullen). He received so much hatred and criticism for his decision.

This is another reason why peacefully resisting the law is a positive thing to a free society because it gives an example on how to lead properly and gain enough respect to be heard. In more recent times, there has been another civil rights movement in the American Society. What the people are angry about now is the police brutality towards minority groups across the nation. The "Black Lives Matter" movement was sparked at people began using their voices, but in the wrong way. The American flag is being burned, National Anthem disrespected, and innocent police officers killed. This is also getting widely televised, but not for the same reasons the peaceful protests were in the 1960s. Back then, protesters were not doing any harm to show exactly how they were being treated, which eventually did not continue because no one felt threatened or the need to fight back. Now protesters are doing a great amount of harm and all it is doing is worsening the sole issue instead of making it better. Today's protesters are being hypocritical and therefore it makes people not want to support them or even listen. If they want peace, then they need to provide

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. It gives citizens an opportunity to exercise their freedom of speech. Most times a peaceful resistance may lead to an anarchic society. Giving a people a chance to express their thoughts and perspective on passing a law can keep a free society civilized.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because when violence is involved, people fight one another and they don't listen to each other's voices, which leads to nothing getting solved.

Peaceful resistance to laws has a negative impact on society. Even though nobody gets hurt, morale is lowered and respect toward others and toward the government gets lost. Take the case of Edward Snowden for example. He is young, so people my age are going to be influenced by his actions. We could lose respect for Security Agencies because they employed this untrustworthy individual, so how are they going to keep our future safe? Also, my private information should stay private, if I wanted it to be public, I would make it public myself. I don't feel like the government protects my information and so now that puts a negative view of the government in my head and in the heads of my peers. Even though what he did doesn't affect me as a young person, it feels like it does. I think not obeying the

To ask whether peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society is to miss the purpose of peaceful resistance. If civil disobedience is necessary, it is because the society is not free in some way. Of course, no society is entirely authoritarian or free - real-world societies fall somewhere on a spectrum between the two. But to call a society ‘free’ in which some people are oppressed is to say that this oppression is of secondary importance. This is a dangerous fallacy - when some people in a society are not free, everyone is negatively affected.

Resistance to the government will always have big impacts. Whether that impact is positive or negative is up for debate. But peace resistance will always have a much louder impact. I believe that peaceful resistance is the ultimate key to change. In times of need, civil disobedience is one to rely on to avoid violence. Going with non-violent protest are an easier and less harming to everyone. Civil disobedience allows others to voice their opinions without fear of being harmed in the process. It allows people to explain their disagreement with a law or action in a peaceful way.

Since when has violence ever been the answer to solving a problem? NEVER. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because for one, we live in a country where we are allowed to express our thoughts and opinions freely. Protests are a fantastic way to get your point across to others. However, it is when those once peaceful protests warp into a hate riot including burning and breaking property that the police have to step in.

“All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable” (Thoreau). Resistance to the government is legal when the government becomes tyrannical, which is when it abuses the rights of the people. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it protects the rights of the people, including life, and if viewed as nonviolent, it can protect terrifying turmoil. Also, peaceful resistance does not always mean civil disobedience, which involves breaking laws, which violent resistance tends to be.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence