'Resistance To Peacefulness' By Rosa Parks

Martin Luther King Jr. finds himself in Birmingham due to the fact of the unfairness there. When people are in need of help, King describes that he feels he has to answer their pleas for assistance (King, par. 4). However, there is no doubt in anyone’s mind that Birmingham is flooded with discrimination, explains King (King, par. 7). The whole nation is aware of Birmingham, states king; and they distinguish it by how savagely the law enforcement treats colored people. “Its unjust treatment of Negroes in the courts is a notorious reality” affirms King (King, par. 8).

In my opinion, Peaceful resistance is the reason we have so much freedom in this country today. Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) made it farther (and had a bigger impact) on the President of the United Sates at the time tan Malcom X. A perfect example of peaceful resistance would be Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”. In this letter MLK peacefully puts down the people o the outside who are hurting the rights movement more than helping. As MLK was being put down by some of the people who should be helping this movement he calmly and kindly tells them that what is happening at that time isn’t okay and he will do everything in his power to peacefully change how the United States is today, and especially to get African American’s right to vote. Although, Rosa Parks did provoke the bus

In other words civil disobedience indicates that the main objective of disobedience is to bring changes in the social or political order that would affect the freedom of citizens. Nonviolence is the right answer to moral issues and is crucial in politics for any government on our time the need for human mankind to overcome oppression avoiding violence without resorting to oppression with violence.

Peaceful resistance has been society's way of respectfully bringing to light grievances or injustices they believe have occurred. More often than not these grievances involve some sort of social issue, whether it be under-representation or inequality, as was the case with African Americans during the peak of the Civil Rights Movement, or something more like Constitutional Rights, such as the right to vote as women. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., in their lifetimes, both fought hard for opposite ends of the 'rebellion' spectrum, protesting racism and segregation in their own unique ways. Malcolm X preached violence, using angry, fiery rhetoric to sway the public into following him into livid retaliation. Martin Luther King Jr., on the other hand, expressed

Cesar Chavez published an article on the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. This article consisted of the importance of nonviolent change, and how the outcome will always be for the better. Chavez effectively justifies the morality of nonviolence, as well as demoralizing “senseless violence.”

Free society means that everyone receives the same opportunities, no matter what race, gender, and/or sexual orientation a person may be. Throughout history, there have been many instances in which heroes went against different discriminatory laws in a peaceful manner. These actions have helped the United States become a freer society.

Peaceful resistance in the United States of America, done with the right intentions, has a positive impact of a free society. I hold this belief because as humans we can be flawed in our ways of thinking and require something to draw our attention for us to realize our flawed views. Peaceful resistance is positive because it draws attention to an issue in society, it communicates a level of civility, and it attempts to initiate a positive way of addressing issues in society.

Civil Disobedience is the act of purposely opposing and breaking a law that has been created by the government. When one hears the word "disobedience", one pulls a negative connotation from it; however, Civil Disobedience can sometimes lead to great and immense positive change that can benefit society as a whole. Two wonderful examples of this can be seen in Rosa Parks' refusal to relinquish her seat to a white man, and in MLK'S "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" where he states why he and his fellow marchers must continue to practice Civil Disobedience and to march despite being told they would be arrested if they did so.

How could someone so unpredictable change our thought on civil rights? An individual that can change society change also change history, even if the did they have power could change it no matter if the didn’t. Now we all know what rosa parks did she stood up to her rights, she wanted to be free in her century but couldn't since this time was the time of black people with no rights. In the article “The many and the few” it says the story of how rosa parks got on the nus and changed history in a different way. We have so many people that have changed our civil rights.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts our free society. It allows us to make our voices heard and spread a message if there is a law that we find is either unfair or goes against our protected freedoms. Peaceful resistance has helped our country grow on multiple occasions. It has always been a part of our countries history and is well protected by our First Amendment rights. Due to this, There is little to know doubt that peaceful resistance has positively effected the lives of many Americans.

I believe that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Peaceful resistance has been used by activists for hundreds of years, examples being Mahatma Gandhi and even the founders of the United States. Peaceful resistance has consistently been used as a way for people to convey to their government their views and their feelings in a nonviolent and amicable way. It has been used as a tool for people such as the women of the Suffragette Movement, the people of the Civil Rights Movement, and even for people today to stand up for what they believe in and to make their voices heard.

Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? I think that peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society. Many people used civil disobedience to prove a point in a situation that they believe needs to be changed. There are people such as Henry Throeau, Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks. Many people say that Henry Thoreau is the backbone to civil disobedience. Thoreau was arrested in 1846 for refusing to pay six years of poll taxes in protest of slavery and the Mexican American War. Thoreau believed that individuals could be free only if their actions were true to their own beliefs, with or without the support or approval of the community. Thoreau inspired Gandhi first and then MLK to follow, but these two leaders are responding to more pressing circumstances and responding as members of subjugated classes of people sharply defined by the social markers of race and ethnicity. Another important person who used civil disobedience is the same person who said "You must be the change you wish to see in this world" -Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi used nonviolent civil disobedience to protest racial pass laws in South Africa and in India's Independence struggle, including the famous Salt

Irish author Oscar Wilde claims that disobedience is a valuable human trait and that it promotes social progress, for example, in his claim he mentions that “It is through disobedience that progress has been made.” Though this may be valid in some way, there is still another side of this claim that he failed to mention because, while disobedience can lead to positive change it's not always the best approach and can have consequences. Say someone is at their job and their boss asks them to complete a task, since the boss of the company is in a higher position than them and in charge, they have a right to tell you what to do. So if someone were to disobey the boss by saying “No”, this will most likely get you fired or dropped from a position

For Week 8 of Cultural Anthropology, my main interest came from my readings about human power. Even before I began taking this class, I have always wondered if power was simply just an instinct we humans strive for in our everyday lives, or, does this striving urge come from violence or peace? Through Chapter 12, I was able to dive into the naturality of human behavior towards power. From natural expression, DNA, and adoption, several factors have an effect on human authority and control.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence