Resource Management

very broad one, meaning that industry competition can be very diverse, and indeed it is. The

Acquisition and organisation of resources can be critical success factor in an organization. While on the other hand, change requires a firm to gain expand and utilise resource such as human, financial, knowledge as a crucial asset. Resource based approach supports this view and as Tywoniak (2007) claimed by that resource based view is the most dominant theory in history of management. This is achieved by targeting state of sustained competitive advantage by controlling resources and capabilities. This view emphasis on the need for a ‘fit’ among capabilities and external market, and since each firm has unique capabilities and resources, this result in achieving strategic

the internal analysis of the firm and the external analysis of the industry and competitive environment

competitor is able to provide, either a firm would have to be protected by a barrier that

The resource-based view was developed to help emphasize internal capabilities as a means of creating competitive advantage (Henry, n.d.) In this view, the organization is comprised of a series of resources that are used by management. These resources are the source of new products and the internal improvements that help companies to better compete in the marketplace. There are two different types of resources tangible and intangible. The former category consists of physical assets, and is characterized as physical resources, human resources and capital resources. So physical resources are the buildings, machinery, materials and productive capacity. At Coca-Cola, the company's physical resources

Markets differ in a variety of ways including the degree of concentration and competitiveness, a fact which is reflected in the concept of ‘market structure’. Economists’ models link the structural characteristics of a market to the behaviour of firms in that market and subsequently to their performance. A key question therefore is how far a firm’s strategic decisions are shaped by the structure of the market in which it operates.

He suggested that sustained competitive advantage derives from the resources and capabilities a firm controls that are valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable, and not substitutable. He further added that the resources and capabilities can be viewed in form of tangible and intangible assets. There are four different categories of resources financial, physical, human, and organization.

The first strength of the landlord liaison resource development is that the liaison will be able to provide services to a specific clientele that are in need of housing resources. For instance, the landlord liaison will be affiliated with Family Promise, which is an agency that shelters and provides support to the homeless population. The second strength is that the liaison will have access to additional resources that Family Promise provides while working with families. For example, once the landlord liaison helps the family obtain housing, the organization has an aftercare program that would provide families with more resources. The aftercare program will help the family,

For a business to be successful and have a competitive advantage, it is important to evaluate the company’s resources and capabilities (Pitt & Koufopoulos, 2012). Resources in a company are the productive assets owned (tangible or intangible) whereas capabilities are what the company can do with this (Grant, 2010). “Establishing competitive

Competitive rivalry exists between companies with the same or similar products/services and similar markets. Factors to be considered include:

The resource-based view(RBV), based on the internal environment of a company, explains the performance differences among firms in an assumption of that having a high performance (Wernerfelt,1984) are made up of bundles of resources that give them advantages in the maketing(Barney and Arikan, 2001). It figures out the resources are valuable, rare, costly-imitated and have an organizational orientation, also known as VRIO framework(Barney, 2002). The resources, refer to the

These two streams of research - market orientation and the RBV of the firm - form

Resource-Based Theory has been one among the prevailing theories in strategic management (Acedo, Barroso & Galan, 2006). As the father of the modern Resource-Based View (RBV), Barney (1991) explored that RBV underlines strategic choice, challenging the organization 's management with the essential tasks of identifying and deploying main resources to maximize returns. Correspondingly, Rothaermel (2012:05) defined that the RBV is a model that points out resources as main role to superior firm performance; “If a resource exhibits VRIO attributes, the resource enables the firm to gain and sustain competitive advantage”. However, according to Grant & Marah (2013:116), “individual resources do not confer competitive advantages; they must work together to create capabilities”.

To begin with, heterogeneity of capabilities and resources of firms, which is explained as “enduring and systematic performance differences among relatively close rivals”, provides a foundation of the resource-based view (Song, et al.,2006). The implication of this assumption is that core competence conveys the valuable and unique feature of products to customers. The RBV disagrees with the opinion that the resources are homogeneous; if homogeneity is assumed to be essential to develop a proper strategy, the strategy can be easily copied by competitors, which will ultimately result in the dissipation of above-normal rents. Conversely, the unique and fixed resources on hand will lead to outstanding performance and ultimately turn to be a competitive advantage, under the circumstances that sustainable competitive advantage is achieved in an environment where competition does not exist.

Resources are the source of the firm’s capabilities. Resources are bundled to create organisational capabilities. Some of a firm’s resources are tangible and intangible. Tangible resources are assets that can be seen and quantified. Intangible resources include assets that typically are rooted deeply in the firm’s history and have accumulated over time. Intangible resources are relatively difficult for competitors to analyse and imitate. The four types of tangible resources are financial, organisational, physical and technological. And the three types of intangible resources are human, innovation and reputational (Hanson, D., Hitt, M., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E., 2011, pp. 75-78).