preview

Respect For Patients Autonomy In Saudi Arabia

Better Essays

Truth Telling and the Respect for Patients’ Autonomy in Saudi Arabia
Introduction
In the Western society, truth telling is an essential part of the patient’s autonomy. However, this moral stance is not shared in the Middle East more particularly in Saudi Arabia (SA) and other Islamic societies. Withholding information from the patient regarding diagnosis, treatment, prognosis is considered an acceptable practice in these cultures. The decision-making is shared among family members except with the patients themselves. The truth concealment is more prominent toward elderly and women patients. The Saudi society believes that disclosing bad news about the serious diagnosis or prognosis will extinguish patient’s hope and faith in being cured. …show more content…

They defined the respect for autonomy as “ acknowledging people right to hold views, to make choices, and to take actions based on their values and beliefs” (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009, p. 106). They identify the autonomous person as a person who has the capacities of self-governance such as understanding, reasoning, deliberating and independent choosing (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009). Also, they mentioned that in case of delegating the right to make decision to someone else that decision must be made autonomously by the patient (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009). Assuming that most of these Saudi patients are autonomous people, they deserve respectful actions and behaviors in the health sitting by all healthcare providers and family members based on the common morality …show more content…

The Kantian theory is often called a deontological or non-consequentialist theory . In Kantianism, a moral act is not only according with but also for the sake of obligation and duty (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009). This act must be taken without any traditional or personal motivations (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009). So, a Kantian perspective would in favor telling the truth while concealment and deceiving are actions that lack moral worth. So, lying or withholding the truth is an act that cannot consistently be universalized as a norm of conduct (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009). Similarly, common morality theory emphasizes on a common acceptable moralities that are applicable to all human being despite any cultural, traditional, group or individual variables (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009). Common morality theory stands for actions and traits such as truthfulness, keeping promises, honesty, trustworthiness and other moral standers. Beauchamp and Childress (2009) mentioned that moral responsibility and ethical obligation (e.g. respect for autonomy) must be fulfilled unless it competes with another stronger moral obligation. However, proving supportive justifications to on principle must be met before overriding the other ethical principle. In presented case above, the identified ethical conflict was

Get Access