Respondent Llasos: A Case Study

Details of incident: Defendant and his friend went to the same store where he was arrested previously for shoplifting. He threw a beverage to the security’s face and slapped him. Defendant got really angry when he saw the security. Defendant thinks he was responsible for his arrest in the past because the security caught him for shoplifting. As the defendant is

4.2 Explain the importance of an accessible complaints procedure for reducing the likelihood of abuse

| Recognise and take immediate action to deal with any bullying, harassment or oppressive behaviour according to the policies and procedures of the setting.

On the above listed date and time, I arrived on scene and made contact with the complainant. I gathered the above listed

Ms. Rodriguez stated she called 911 because she wishes to report her son is being bullied. I informed Officer J. Conser, I would handle this call and to have communication reassign the call to me. I introduce myself as the School Resource Officer (SRO) for Brogden Middle School. As we walked back towards the lounge

The insured was asked if he obtained any text messages that he showed the Deputy regarding a conversation he had with the cleaning lady, Ms. Arteaga. He stated he could not recall as he says he had cleared all his text messages. He then suddenly remembered, of the text message he sent to Ms. Arteaga saying that she better put on her seatbelt and get ready for the ride that you're about to go on. She said the threat was taken by Ms. Arteaga as a terrorist threat. He said it was just a statement on his behalf but was considered a threat in her

The complainant was flatulating throughout the night which caused Lynn to kick her out of the bedroom because of the smell. The complainant went into the living room and was unable to go back to sleep and became bored. The complainant decided to put Christmas decorations up throughout the house and on the Christmas tree. The complainant was in the bathroom when Lynn approached her and stated “Why you put decorations on that girl tree” referring to Kiyanna. The complainant told the Lynn that if Kiyanna didn’t like the decorations Kiyanna could take them down. The complainant and Lynn continued to argue and Lynn told the complainant to leave. Lynn then called the Michelle and advised her to bring her shit referring to a gun. A few minutes later Michelle arrived at the home. The complainant who was gathering her belonging to leave advised that Lynn and Kiyanna started putting stuff back in the apartment and taking items out the complainant’s hands. Michelle who was

This evening resident in unit 1115, Keenan Turner was doing a move out. Quin noticed a truck trying to enter but was well over the size to fit in driveway. Quin instructed resident that the truck was too big and would not be allowed to block the entrance gate. Residence stated that it would only be there to load two things and in 30 minutes it would be moved. He stated that guest can use exit gate or either just go around. Quin informed him that wasn’t his choice to make but Turner replied; fine him. When board members Morse and Oliver stepped in to try to assist with the removal of truck. The driver and resident began to argue and cause the problem to escalate more. Quin tried to talk to both drivers and residents in moving it but no luck.

Upon arrival, I made contact with the complainant, who I identified as Rachel Switzer through a previous encounter. Switzer advised that moments before my arrival, she had taken place in a verbal argument with a male subject that was still inside his residence at the above address. I did not observe any physical injuries to Switzer. Switzer stated that the male subject had picked her up and brought her to his residence to spend time together. Switzer stated the argument was over her willingness to take a bath. Switzer advised that the male subject and her have dated in the past for a total of

Case law suggests that an isolated incident is insufficient to make a prima facie showing of harassment, but does not establish a bright line rule about the quantity of incidents that constitute a course of conduct. In this case, the petition alleges several text messages and fully describes at least two of them. This is sufficient to establish a course of conduct.

The evidence gathered (interview, voice recordings) supports a finding that Respondent Panico violated the Workplace Violence Prevention Program (DP-18-R-2) when she left numerous profane, threatening, abusive and harassing telephones messages on Complainant Borders work telephone.

If only LTSS services are included in the pilot program, planning and implementation to ensure continuity of care should emphasize the following:

Respondent Llasos denies that he intentionally intimidated Complainant Langdon. Respondent Llasos stated that he talks loud because he has a hearing problem. Respondent Llasos stated that Complainant Landon has a strong personality and can be difficult to supervise. Respondent Llasos stated that Complainant Langdon's email communications are demanding and "she acts like she is the supervisor." (Attachment 2) Respondent Llasos stated that when he approached Complainant Langdon's cubicle on February 28, 2017, he attempted to discuss several business processes with her. Respondent Llasos stated that Complainant Langdon told him that he did not understand the process. Respondent Llasos stated, "Her comments were provoking." My understanding as

Respondent Snow stated that on December 21, 2016, she was at one of her employees’ cubicle and she decided walk down the aisle toward Complainant Percifield’s cubicle. Respondent Snow stated that as she started to pass Complainant Percifield, she "thunked him" on the back of his head three times and said "Bugs." Complainant Percifield was sitting with his back to Respondent Snow. Complainant Percifield turned partially around and called me "crazy" Respondent Snow told Complainant Percifield, "No, you’re crazy. I have seen your Facebook page."

Did you personally view this harassment or were you informed by someone else and if by someone else who and what did they say? 3. Do you know of anyone or anything else that should be taken into consideration where this situation is