Response Intervention ( Rti )

Response to Intervention (RtI) came about initially in answer to the over-identification of struggling students as special education students. It was developed starting in the late 1970s by numerous researchers seeking a method of identifying learning disabilities that avoids the problems of the discrepancy model. Many educators were concerned that too many students were being identified as having a learning disability, not because they actually had one, “but because they had not been successful in a general education program” (Prasse, 2010). Many were also concerned that students with a true learning disability were not receiving the help they needed quickly enough. Before RtI, the accepted

As in any research based program there are benefits and challenges. One of the biggest benefits of RTI is it has the ability to transform how we educate all students. When implementing Response to Intervention it helps to treat learning disabilities, identifies students with disabilities, classifies every student’s strengths and targets the specific disability. Perhaps the greatest benefit of an RTI approach is that it eliminates a “wait to fail” situation because students get help promptly within the general education setting. As soon as assessment data indicates a problem area for a student, interventions are put into place to address these concerns. One of the biggest challenges that are occurring is that RTI is still uneven; some districts use it and some do not and because of this it becomes a challenge. There is confusion as to what RTI is and whether schools are required to use. In addition, the evidence based and differentiated instruction is one of the issues in response to education. “Interventions that are research based but not feasible are not likely to be implemented with fidelity, which would undercut the validity of RTI decision making” (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010,

In other words, it is an extremely subjective process” (Response to Intervention (RTI) vs the Discrepancy Model). As stated, many teachers provide accommodations as needed but they do not know how to document the strategies used or measure the

Response to Intervention (RTI) is a three-tiered system that provides for increasingly interventions as students move upward through the tiers. The first tier involves all students on a campus. During this tier, all students are provided with effective instruction using research-based teaching and learning strategies. Students are benchmarked at the beginning, middle, and end of each year. About 65%-75% of all students respond to the initial tier of interventions and no further intervention is required. Tier 2 interventions take place in small groups and are in addition to the interventions of Tier 1. The areas of weakness are targeted, and instruction may be provided by the general education teacher or other school personnel. Student progress

RTI was designed for both general and special education students with interventions and instructions

Response to Intervention (RtI) is a framework based off the problem solving method that integrates assessment, and targeted instruction, within a multi-tiered intervention system. Implementation of RtI in schools is crucial to identify which students need additional intervention that will help increase their literacy skills, and prevent them from falling behind. RtI is based off multi-leveled tiers that are each categorized by the intensity of the intervention that is being used. The RtI framework is also used as a valued tool in monitoring and improving student behavior in the classroom through a model known as Positive Behavioral Intervention Support (PBIS).

In this webinar the presenters focus on ELLs and RTI. The first key word is the evidence based assessment and curriculum. The focus of RTI is preventions and maximizing student’s achievement and students are growing academically. The goals are for all students to meet their highest potential and use general education. Sheltered instruction is part of the core curriculum. The core curriculum is meeting at least 80% on each sub group.

Parents play a huge role in the RTI process. The ASCA National Model (2012) tells us that the “parent must feel welcomed at the school and that their voice is valued” (p. 17). The purpose of RTI is to determine what students are struggling academically or behaviorally, and provide intervention. It is the job of the RTI team to determine if the interventions are successfully working (ASCA National Model, 2012, p. 73). Most parents want what’s best for their child, which includes a successful and positive school experience. Parental involvement is essential, because they can provide extra support at home to help their struggling student. For example, I had a student last year who was on the third-tier of the RTI process.

In the 3rd step plan the implementation is when educators will monitor and provide feedback to ensure the intervention is delivers properly. And step 4 is to evaluate the problem, consultant and teacher will evaluate the responsiveness to the intervention and modify if needed. These steps result in a great intervention program that is precise to see desired results in the RTI. With intervention trial and error is how real results are achieved. In previous years before interventions and RTI’s were placed in schools, too many children were sent for learning disabilities or special education showing teachers inability or unwillingness to teach sand accommodate academic diversity ( Reynolds, 1987). The article states how teachers can generally implement learning strategies until the student gets it and if after interventions and RTi’s measure the responsiveness as not responsive the child can be placed in special education to receive IEP’s to adjust to their learning disability.

The Response to Intervention framework is a critical element of the Westside Elementary to meet the individual instructional needs of our students. The school utilizes universal screenings to access all students reading data in grades one through five, three times throughout the school year. Primarily, two assessments, STAR and Aimsweb data, determine the pathway of the students and the services deemed appropriate, including teacher information and collaboration with the MTSS team. The students partake in the assessments three times a year; fall, winter, and spring. Tiers are not stagnant; students may receive services from multiple tiers, depending on instructional, academic, and environmental needs. Therefore,

Response to intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach that identifies and support students with learning disabilities and behavioral issues. RTI is designed for early intervention in struggling children, to provide appropriate instruction, and prevention of special education. The multi-tier approach of RTI consists of multiple levels. The most common used approach is the three-tier model. There are different levels of intervention, which is determined on the specific needs of the student. RTI is considered a dynamic assessment an approach that emphasizes the learning process and is based on the test-intervention-retest model (Cohen, Swerdlik, and Sturman, 2013). Dependent on the child’s response to instruction, the level of intervention will increase and intensify. The three levels of RTI consist of: Tier 1- The whole class, is focused on academically. All students are screened for at risk of failing, teacher uses instruction and intervention, and progress of all students are monitored through assessment. Tier 2- Small group interventions- In addition to the normal classroom setting and instruction, children that do not respond to Tier 1 will move to this level. The child will be placed in small groups with instruction, teacher will monitor progress through assessment, as well has parent involvement at home. Tier 3- Intensive Intervention- this level is the

The chapter goes on to address the topic of RTI (response to intervention). The purpose of RTI is to identify students that need support before they fall behind. There are three tiers for the intervention support. Tier one targets most of the students in the classroom. The teacher will assess the students

First is high-quality research-based instruction in the general education classroom setting; all students will receive the same general education. Next is the ongoing monitoring of student performances. Like I said before, this includes screening and progress monitoring of that student. Also, there are multiple tiers of instruction that get more intense as time goes on, based on the student’s response. There are two approaches that are used with the RtI approach. They are the problem-solving approach and the standard treatment protocol approach. With the problem-solving approach, a group of professionals decide the context of the intervention that will be used with that student. This is to make sure that no single intervention is used all throughout the school. The standard treatment protocol approach is the complete opposite. It uses one universal approach to all students receiving interventions for extra help. These two approaches are used together frequently and called the blended

Response to Intervention and the Changing Roles of Schoolwide Personnel by Rita Bean and Jennifer Lilenstein is an article that describes ideas for how teachers, principals, and specialized personnel can address the challenges of Response to intervention initiatives in schools. Rtinet org describe Response to Intervention (RTI) as a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Knowing this definition, we as a teacher can tell that this is a very important topic regarding early education. The article bases their statement on a research executed in schools and professionals that have year of experience using this practice.

I think Response to intervention and instruction is necessary because the sooner we can identify and treat difficulties the better outcome for the students. I agree with Megan Zerega RTI is proactive which is different than what America is used too. The children are identified in the general education classrooms and receive tiered services inside the classroom depending on the child’s needs. I like how Cali mention children with all behavioral and learning disabilities. RTI coincides with the six principles of IDEIA 2014; least restrictive environment, free and appropriate public education, procedural due process, parent and student participation, nondiscriminatory evaluation