Response To Intervention

Response to Intervention (RtI) came about initially in answer to the over-identification of struggling students as special education students. It was developed starting in the late 1970s by numerous researchers seeking a method of identifying learning disabilities that avoids the problems of the discrepancy model. Many educators were concerned that too many students were being identified as having a learning disability, not because they actually had one, “but because they had not been successful in a general education program” (Prasse, 2010). Many were also concerned that students with a true learning disability were not receiving the help they needed quickly enough. Before RtI, the accepted

As in any research based program there are benefits and challenges. One of the biggest benefits of RTI is it has the ability to transform how we educate all students. When implementing Response to Intervention it helps to treat learning disabilities, identifies students with disabilities, classifies every student’s strengths and targets the specific disability. Perhaps the greatest benefit of an RTI approach is that it eliminates a “wait to fail” situation because students get help promptly within the general education setting. As soon as assessment data indicates a problem area for a student, interventions are put into place to address these concerns. One of the biggest challenges that are occurring is that RTI is still uneven; some districts use it and some do not and because of this it becomes a challenge. There is confusion as to what RTI is and whether schools are required to use. In addition, the evidence based and differentiated instruction is one of the issues in response to education. “Interventions that are research based but not feasible are not likely to be implemented with fidelity, which would undercut the validity of RTI decision making” (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010,

This three-tier RTI system is wonderful at the early stages of education because it allows teachers to identify at-risk students and move them through the intervention process. However, in the later stages, it is often too late to evaluate students for learning disabilities as these should have been recognized early on in a child’s education. It should be noted that students at this stage do still need interventions, but in a different format.

Response to Intervention (RtI) is a “data-driven and structured procedure for analyzing students’ learning problems” (Friend 49). The purpose of RtI is to use a systematic approach of increasing interventions for students in order to determine if a student has a learning disability. IRtI is a great program for school to use to help students but it is not mandated by IDEA.

Response to Intervention (RTI), is an early detection, prevention, and support system that attempts to identify and assist struggling students with appropriate levels of intervention. This strategy may determine if a student based on their time prior in Tier 3, would be qualified for special education with a qualification of learning disability. The RTI has three tiers which allows a teacher to monitor their student’s progress during instructions. The three levels of the RTI are explained through an article called, “Understanding Response to Intervention”, which states:

Response to Intervention (RTI) is a three-tiered system that provides for increasingly interventions as students move upward through the tiers. The first tier involves all students on a campus. During this tier, all students are provided with effective instruction using research-based teaching and learning strategies. Students are benchmarked at the beginning, middle, and end of each year. About 65%-75% of all students respond to the initial tier of interventions and no further intervention is required. Tier 2 interventions take place in small groups and are in addition to the interventions of Tier 1. The areas of weakness are targeted, and instruction may be provided by the general education teacher or other school personnel. Student progress

There are 3 Tiers: 1) High-Quality Classroom Instruction, Screening, and group Interventions. 2) Targeted Interventions. 3) Intensive Interventions and Comprehensive Evaluation Different types of Response To Intervention (RTI) which suits each individual and provides the high-quality information they need in order to succeed. Tier 1: All students will receive high-quality and technological based instruction provided by our qualified teachers and instructors to ensure each student is provided with the best learning possible. Tier 2: Students who are not making sufficient progress in regular classrooms in Tier 1 are then issued and provided with progressively intensive instruction that matches the needs based on their level of performance and rates of progress.

Response to Intervention (RtI) is a framework based off the problem solving method that integrates assessment, and targeted instruction, within a multi-tiered intervention system. Implementation of RtI in schools is crucial to identify which students need additional intervention that will help increase their literacy skills, and prevent them from falling behind. RtI is based off multi-leveled tiers that are each categorized by the intensity of the intervention that is being used. The RtI framework is also used as a valued tool in monitoring and improving student behavior in the classroom through a model known as Positive Behavioral Intervention Support (PBIS).

The author of the article also ascertain that the practice is an effective one since the RTI practice is capable of matching researched-based interventions that are of high quality to the behavioral and educational needs of the students. The practice also uses the concept of monitoring the progress used in assessing need for the require changes in goals or instructions, and finally, the practice may also include the additional tiers for the purpose of instructional intensity or if possible even to be eligible for special education (Rose & Howley,

Recently in the field of education, a great emphasis has been put on equal access to education and academic success in the school setting. With laws like No Child Left Behind supporting this belief, there has been an increase in academic accountability and success, especially for minority students, in the areas of reading and mathematics. The population of students is increasingly diverse and according to Sun, Nam, and Vanderwood (2010), the population of English Language Learners (ELLs) has increased significantly, representing 5.1 million students or 10% of the total public school enrollment (p. 1). In this population of ELL students 76% of students are performing below grade level in English reading, which is concerning as foundational literacy is important to academic success (Sun, Nam, & Vanderwood, 2010, p. 1). With the increasing demands of accountability and performance and the significant growth of ELL students, Response to Intervention (RTI) has been implemented to support students learning needs. Response to Intervention is a multi-tier approach, which provides struggling learners with interventions to increase learning. In regards to Response to Intervention and ELLs, there is not as much research as is present for the

In regards to the reading program it is appropriate for each special education and at-risk student. The reading program is implemented with specifications acquiescing to their individual education programs (IEP), and recommended reading levels. Although the students are working together in a small group in the second tier of the intervention process, each student progresses according to individual achievement based on goals designated in their IEP, and teacher recommendations based on their current reading grade level. The individual responsiveness of each student determines whether they transition to the third tier of the RTI process, or if they are able to appropriately progress at the current level of intervention. Presently, the two at risk students have maintained the status quo, not progressing sufficiently, and have

The chapter goes on to address the topic of RTI (response to intervention). The purpose of RTI is to identify students that need support before they fall behind. There are three tiers for the intervention support. Tier one targets most of the students in the classroom. The teacher will assess the students

Response to intervention is a program that integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention system to maximize student achievement and to reduce behavioral problems. This program helps students with disabilities, and students that struggle in the classroom. It also helps students to maintain a good behavior in the classroom. I believe there are a lot of reasons why schools are starting to adopt this system. For example, I think schools want this system because it reduces problems in the classroom, allows teachers to monitor children so they can see what there strengths and weakness are, and it also gives the teacher a way to keep track of their academics and behavior. I think teachers want what is best for their students,

Response to Intervention (RTI) is a form of help for general education teachers to identify early signs of learning issues to determine which students may need special education services. The Federal law requires documentation of a student’s intervention, before students are eligible for special education services. Also, it is useful for a student’s Individual Education Program (IEP) records, because after interventions the school can document which types of services and support a student needs, in the IEP. Schools use the RTI intervention to avoid using accommodations and individual teaching on students who don’t need them however provide them to students who truly need these resources.

“Response to Intervention (RtI) is a process used by educators to help students who are struggling with a skill or lesson; every teacher will use interventions (a set of teaching procedures) with any student to help them succeed in the classroom” (Special Education Guide, 2013). RtI is composed of three main components: A tiered system of services, a problem-solving approach, and a data collection system. Tier 1 begins with high quality, researched based instruction and screening in the traditional classroom. The screening process identifies the underachieving students that need Tier 2 individualized support provided in small group setting. If those targeted students continue to struggle, they will move to the intensive level or Tier 3. This level provides individualized, intensive skill specific interventions. If the student does not make significant progress at this level, further evaluations will be made to decide if the student needs special education services.