Response To Intervention Chapter 1 Summary

This paper focuses on the Response to Intervention. As educators we are hearing RTI more frequently in the school districts than ever before. Many educators and state officials agree that all teachers should know and get to know the benefits and importance of RTI. The most crucial aspect to know is the RTI takes place into the regular childhood classroom; this is not something that just special education teachers need to know. This paper explains the purpose and a brief history of RTI. The paper offers ways that it is beneficial for school districts to implement this research based program. However, as in many systems there are always challenges, the paper briefly discusses some of the challenges that educators

In this case study, Miguel clearly shows difficulties in reading. The difficulties stated include: recognizing alphabet letters (alphabetic awareness), matching sounds to letters (letter-sound correspondence), telling sounds apart (sounding out), starting/ending sounds (sounding out), and remembering words quickly (sight word reading) (Meet Miguel, n.d.). In order to address these difficulties, the authors would approach this problem in a two pronged manner: 1) immediate bridge methods for learning, and 2) RTI approach.

In the article, “Response to Intervention in Reading for English Language Learners”, the authors Sharon Vaughn and Alba Ortiz explain, how much native language and/or ESL instruction students receive depends on the program model. Students in English as a second language programs do not receive native language instruction; they are typically educated within general education classrooms and have a support program for English as a Second Language. In planning Response to Intervention approaches, it is significant to recognize the program in which English language learners are registered, how their native language and English proficiency is measured and observed, and the core literacy program they have for development of

Response to Intervention (RTI) is an in school service program designed to guarantee that all students are getting a high quality education. Before students are referred for special education services, it is essential that they receive effective teaching designed to meet their own learning requirements. All students in public schools are required to be included in the RTI program.

“One of the essential roles of special education teachers is coteaching and working with other professionals, as well as communicating with family members and between special education teachers and other school-related professionals(Vaughn & Bos, 2015, p. 114)”. With the importance of a least restrictive environment special education and general education teachers are working together in a classroom with varying levels and abilities of learners. It is vitally important to have an effective relationship between the two teachers while developing and implementing lesson plans for learners with special needs. The physical space and dynamics of the classroom should fit the needs of the students and the established procedures should ensure a highly functional environment. Importantly, educators need to communicate to families “encouragement about what they can do at home and about an effective plan for providing instructional supports for their child(Vaughn & Bos, 2015, p. 114)”.

Response to intervention, also known as RTI, is a multi-tiered system for early identification and a process that implements support for students with learning and behavioral needs. There is no standardized system for RTI, therefore there are variations and many ways to implement and initiate these services. Typically these services are broken down into steps or tiers, in order to ensure all students are being universally screened and are receiving the help they need.

Response to Intervention is defined in the book as the multi-tiered framework for addressing academic skills. There is three level of tiers, primary instruction or primary prevention, secondary intervention or secondary prevention, tertiary intervention or tertiary prevention. This approach if given to the students so they do not have to be failing in third or fourth grade, before they are provided with this intervention to help them succeed in reading. The students are given research based teaching in their classroom to help them with their reading , if so they are struggling the teacher will be able to catch it in their earlier years, such as the first or second grade.

When it comes to education, special education is a much needed service for students with disabilities. In order for students with disabilities to succeed in life, it is imperative to expose them to as many educational tools as possible. Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA), 2004 solidified equal education opportunities for persons with disabilities. Researchers Diliberto and Brewer (2014) indicated that working together as a team to develop an effective IEP ensures academic success for students with disabilities. So, how important is an IEP? According to Diliberto and Brewer (2014) the IEP is the major key to planning the student’s instruction and provides an intervention to their educational needs. Diliberto and Brewer developed six tips that would assist an educator with having a successful IEP meeting.

Response to intervention is a program that integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention system to maximize student achievement and to reduce behavioral problems. This program helps students with disabilities, and students that struggle in the classroom. It also helps students to maintain a good behavior in the classroom. I believe there are a lot of reasons why schools are starting to adopt this system. For example, I think schools want this system because it reduces problems in the classroom, allows teachers to monitor children so they can see what there strengths and weakness are, and it also gives the teacher a way to keep track of their academics and behavior. I think teachers want what is best for their students,

Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tiered approach to identify and accommodate students with behavioral and learning needs; however, are these approaches providing the best opportunities for success for our students. In this peer reviewed article entitled “Effectiveness of a 10-Week Teir-1 Response to Intervention in Improving Fine Motor and Visual-Motor skills in General Education Kindergarten Students” explores the effects of an RTI developed in collaboration with classroom teachers to enhance fine motor in visual-motor skills of general education kindergarten students. (Ohl, M., Graze, H., Weber, K., Kenny, S., Salvatore, C., & Wagreich, S., 2013) The author’s research is comprised of 113 elementary students of six different elementary schools who were randomly selected into various control

A practice model that can assist schools and school districts in implementing Senate Bill 177 is Response to Intervention (RTI). RTI is a three-tiered model of prevention and support meant to identify students at risk and provide academic and behavioral supports in the classroom (Gustafson, Svensson, & Fälth, 2014). Tier 1 focuses on general behavioral interventions for all students in the classroom (Gustafson et al., 2014). Children who fail to meet a predetermined minimum criterion for RTI will be assigned to Tier 2 intervention (Gustafson et al., 2014, p. 29). Tier 2 involves self-regulation interventions in the form of group sessions (Gustafson et al., 2014, p. 29). It has specific curriculum-based

This article is extremely relevant not only in the field of education, but it is also relevant to issues that educators and those in the education field are currently experiencing. This article seeks to determine what and how to make school-based intervention teams more effective for those providing the educational services (educators) and those receiving the educational services (students). Special education is a prominent concern in world of education. Many students are not receiving the help that they need or deserve and education systems should be continually refining and searching for ways to improve and advance intervention plans for all students. As the article suggests, there has not been much research conducted in this area. It is a relatively unexplored and growing concern. This research and the author’s

If these students were placed in a regular classroom, they were often functionally excluded, when no support was provided for the child or the teacher. In addition, many students were misclassified following inaccurate assessment, placement or tracking. These past practices have been deemed in violation of a student’s constitutional rights. As a result, IDEA now requires that the educational program that is developed by the IEP team provide the child with opportunities in the least restrictive environment (LRE). LRE is the most normal setting that is possible for the student. The team should take several things into consideration when making this determination. First, they must compare the benefits in the regular class and the benefits in the special class. The U.S. Court of Appeals determined that the appropriateness of placement in the regular classroom is not dependent on the student’s ability to learn the same things the other students learn in the regular classroom. The benefit of social interaction should also be taken into account. Second, consideration should be given to the potentially beneficial or harmful effects that placement in the regular classroom may have on the students involved. Finally, cost should be considered when determining the appropriateness of student placement.

The teachers in successful schools work as a team to achieve this goal. A test of consultation, collaboration, and teaming concludes these approaches have been supported by professionals from various areas for at least the past 25 years. Legal basis for the approaches existing in federal laws such as P.L. 94-142 and amendments to it, as well as in state and local education agencies services delivery of others. The model in the book suggest interactive teaming as a response to the nation 's increasingly problems in special needs programs because it includes the teacher empowerment, community responsiveness and professional collaboration, all of which characterize successful schools for students who have special needs or are at risk. As we learned in the book, the interactive team is a group that functions at the highest level of professionalism because it involves both consultation and collaboration of each member of the team. The interactive teaming model includes components previously used to provide services to student with mild disabilities and in programs that provide educational, foundations and specific dimensions of interactive teaming.

Collaboration is a huge part of having special education and general education kids together. Collaboration between general education teachers and special education teachers helps to ensure that every student is getting an education, with specialized instruction, but in a general education. There are many ways to help this happen. Teachers can always co-teach, or have shared classroom management. If it is needed, the special education student can take the student to an alternative setting. One of the most important things is that both teachers have a consultation of work to discuss instructional strategies. These collaboration techniques are why we can integrate special education students in the general education classroom with their