Response To Intervention Paper

As in any research based program there are benefits and challenges. One of the biggest benefits of RTI is it has the ability to transform how we educate all students. When implementing Response to Intervention it helps to treat learning disabilities, identifies students with disabilities, classifies every student’s strengths and targets the specific disability. Perhaps the greatest benefit of an RTI approach is that it eliminates a “wait to fail” situation because students get help promptly within the general education setting. As soon as assessment data indicates a problem area for a student, interventions are put into place to address these concerns. One of the biggest challenges that are occurring is that RTI is still uneven; some districts use it and some do not and because of this it becomes a challenge. There is confusion as to what RTI is and whether schools are required to use. In addition, the evidence based and differentiated instruction is one of the issues in response to education. “Interventions that are research based but not feasible are not likely to be implemented with fidelity, which would undercut the validity of RTI decision making” (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010,

The Special Education team for learning disabilities will test the student. These students have shown signs of continuous problems with interventions in place. Psychologist, psychiatrist, and any other testing will be conducted with parental consent have evaluated the student. Parents will be mandated to attend all assessment evaluations and the team shall review the findings for referral back to tier two or upgrade student to tier four for special educational services based on educational or problematic behaviors.

In the model that Kentucky uses, all students fall into Tier 1 interventions as part of their general education curriculum. Students who are not making progress or exceeding standards fall into the Tier 2 targeted range and are in need of individualized interventions. Students who are not making progress or exceeding Tier 2 standards are in need of intensive Tier 3 interventions. If Tier 3 interventions are not working students are then evaluated for special education services.

Response to Intervention (RtI) is a “data-driven and structured procedure for analyzing students’ learning problems” (Friend 49). The purpose of RtI is to use a systematic approach of increasing interventions for students in order to determine if a student has a learning disability. IRtI is a great program for school to use to help students but it is not mandated by IDEA.

If the appropriate progress is not made by a student in Tier III in a timely matter, the next step would be to test the student for any learning disabilities that are hindering their literacy skills.

I learned that the RTI cannot delay the identification of a learning disability. Parents also does not have much of a role in the early stages of the RTI process. Data from assessment should be provide to the student’s parents. RTI does not replace

Response to Intervention, also known as RTI is a method made up of multiple tiers, to provide early recognition and aid of children with needs concerning to their behavior or learning. This process includes high quality teaching and general screening for all children in a mainstream classroom setting. The multiple tier systems of support, fits into the existing definitions for learning disabilities by classifying students into the tiers they require in order to achieve academic success based on their needs. Before a student enters their tiers, each student goes through a screening and progress monitoring to determine where they are in their educational setting. Once this has taken place and the data have been analyzed, students will be placed

Response to intervention (RTI) is an assessment procedure that consists of a multi-step approach to progressively intensive intervention and monitoring within general education for purposes of improving achievement outcomes and accurately recognizing students with learning disabilities. Components of the RTI process include universal screening, multi-tiered levels of support, evidence-based intervention, and using students' responsiveness to evaluate the status of their progress (Jenkins, Schiller, Blackorby, Thayer, & Tilly, 2013). Universal screening measures for students are not likely to result in definite identification for special education. Before students are placed they must be correctly identified with a precise assessment

In the RTI program, all students start out at tier one, which is called the general instruction level. All students receive the general education teacher’s instruction and for 80 to 85 percent of students that is all the instruction they need. If a student struggles for 6 or more weeks a student may be moved to tier two, which focuses on small group instruction. The student would continue to receive the general instruction and have additional small group instruction either with the general education teacher or special education teacher for an extra 30 to 45 minutes a week. This group of students represents 10 to 15 percent of the student population. Finally, if after six weeks of targeted interventions, if a student is still struggling, the student will be tested for needing special education services, which is about four percent of the student population. Students are supposed to “filter” in and out of the different tiers after a certain amount of time (every 6 weeks, or every grading period). However, in the state of Kentucky if a student is identified under the age of 9, the student will be classified as developmentally delayed instead of their identified disability (See Developmental Delay and its

This article is commentary to Justice's (2005) article on the effects of EBP and RTI on reading instruction. Both RTI and EBP can be used to promote effective change in the way services are provided in the school setting. As a response to the original article, Ukrainetz (2006) stated that utilizing RTI and EBP can provide opportunities as well as challenges for SLPs. Using these techniques can make considerable changes in the way children are identified for services as well as refining language intervention.

The next article I researched was bout potential implementations for 3rd grade students who were identified as learning disabled. This article talked about how RTI’s are the front running alternatives to placing a student in special education. Interventionists, who were undergrad special education teacher candidates, used RTI approach on 3rd grade children with reading disabilities. The

Tier 1 instructional program is synonymous with the core reading or math curriculum that is typically aligned with state standards.

Response to intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach that identifies and support students with learning disabilities and behavioral issues. RTI is designed for early intervention in struggling children, to provide appropriate instruction, and prevention of special education. The multi-tier approach of RTI consists of multiple levels. The most common used approach is the three-tier model. There are different levels of intervention, which is determined on the specific needs of the student. RTI is considered a dynamic assessment an approach that emphasizes the learning process and is based on the test-intervention-retest model (Cohen, Swerdlik, and Sturman, 2013). Dependent on the child’s response to instruction, the level of intervention will increase and intensify. The three levels of RTI consist of: Tier 1- The whole class, is focused on academically. All students are screened for at risk of failing, teacher uses instruction and intervention, and progress of all students are monitored through assessment. Tier 2- Small group interventions- In addition to the normal classroom setting and instruction, children that do not respond to Tier 1 will move to this level. The child will be placed in small groups with instruction, teacher will monitor progress through assessment, as well has parent involvement at home. Tier 3- Intensive Intervention- this level is the

RTI has three tier levels. At Tier 1, all students are at the general instruction and assessment stage. At Tier 2, some students are at the supplementary instruction and assessment stage. At Tier 3, few students are at the specialized instruction and assessment stage. This stage can take quite some time for students to get out of, but educational professionals need to continue to be patient and work with students. This is also an opportunity for educational professionals to collaborate with their team to come up with differentiated instructional

Following Tier 1 comes Tier 2. Tier 2 had small groups meet up 3 times a week for group reading. 31 children received Tier 2 in kindergarden in the study. These students would be in small groups from 2 to 4 and from 10-15 minutes. Instructors used smaller