The main job or responsibility of the justice systems is to enforce the laws that are put in place to protect our country and the people who live in it. The head justices try their hardest to set certain consequences that is fit to the crime, the more malicious the crime the larger the consequence. America more specifically tries to keep its justice system fair with prosecuting and fulfilling its sentences. Sometimes the justice system goes too far. By no means is any justice system perfect, but a large controversial punishment that has been enforced in this country is capital punishment. Capital punishment is also known as the death penalty and is mostly used for those who are convicted with multiple murder and rape counts. Enforcing …show more content…
According to deathpenaltyinfo.org this occurred in the Carlos DeLuna case in Texas in 1983. DeLuna was convicted of violent stabbings. These stabbing were inflicted upon a convenience store worker named Wanda Lopez. DeLuna was executed in 1989. Later is was discovered that evidence actually pointed towards his innocence. A different man, Carlos Hernandez, was guilty, he also was previously connected to similar malicious actions. DeLuna was an innocent man that paid the price for a murder that was committed by someone else. No one deserves to lose their life because of someone else. This case alone proves that the death penalty is no better than a murderer killing innocent people. Carlos DeLuna would agree. Unfortunately, the DeLuna case is not the only case in which an innocent person’s life was sacrificed for the price of another man’s crime. There have been multiple cases of these sorts of situations, which is a sad and unfortunate fact. I found this case specifically upsetting because they both the guys had the same name and I can help but wonder if that’s one of the reasons they were so dead set on DeLuna being the killer because he shared a named with the actual killer.
The case of Ruban Cantu, is another case which proves the horrific flaws that occurs in the death penalty. Cantu was only 17 years of age when he was charged for murder. He pleaded his innocence but when a “witness” named Moreno stepped
In this paper I will be discussing everything you need to know about the death penalty such as its pros and cons. While the innocent can be killed, the death penalty has its pros because it prevents them from killing again if they are released or have escaped from prison, it helps overpopulated prisons, and it can help victims’ families get justice and closure. Not only can the innocent be killed, but in the past the death penalty was very inhumane. To some its feels right but to others they feel like 2 wrongs don’t make a right. Most people think that the defendant deserves the death penalty, but what does the defendants’ family think?
Today our world is filled with crime. The people committing these crimes must have a consequence for their illegal actions. The system in place to keeping everything fair and safe is called the criminal justice system. This was put in place to ensure there is fairness and justice served to people who break the laws set up by the government.
The criminal justice system has been proven to play a very important role in society. The criminal justice system is used to keep the citizens in check and to make sure that the laws that are made are being followed. It also is there to penalize anyone who disobeys the laws. In the criminal justice system, there are 3 main parts, law enforcement, adjudication, and corrections. Law enforcement is self-explainable. It consists of the law enforcers such as police officers and sheriffs. Adjudication is made up of people in the court house such as judges and lawyers. Corrections is made up of jailhouse matters such as prison officials. In these many components of the criminal justice system, there are all put in place to help correct people to do the right thing. There are punitive efforts and rehabilitative efforts. At time, the system may lean towards one category or more, which can be dangerous in terms of disciplinary action. The criminal justice system is more punitive than rehabilitative which makes the system ineffective.
In Oklahoma, Greg Wilhoit serves as an inspiration to end the infamous capital punishment. His wife was viciously murdered in Tulsa, Oklahoma on the 1st of June. Greg was alleged for the death of his spouse, and was found guilty when the bite marks found on his wife’s body matched his teeth. He was then put in jail and was sentenced to death in 8 years. However it was proven wrong and he successfully won the case, but he didn’t win the nightmarish trauma that strongly affected his mentality during those forlorn 8 years of false accusation. It led him to depression and eventually his miserable demise. Greg’s case is an example of an inaccurate and flawed judgment of death penalty. Everyone deserves a second chance, less allegations which cause wrong executions, and reverence to human rights.
In the criminal justice system, there is a controversy in the system regarding fairness or disagreement and changes need to be done. Many people believe it needs to change to improve and others believe it is unfair or dishonest in punishing people. The criminal justice system is in charge of punishing criminals and the correctional system helps inmates from committing crimes again. The goal of rehabilitation is to reduce crime in society. The criminal justice system affects all of society because it determines the punishment people will receive after being convicted of crimes.
The death penalty has been a controversial topic among society for ages. An issue often brought up when discussing the legality of capital punishment is wrongful convictions. Advocates of the death penalty say that, while wrongful convictions are an issue, those few cases do not outweigh the need for lawful execution of felons who are, without a doubt, guilty. On the other hand, the opponents argue that the death penalty is wrong from both a legal and moral standpoint, an ineffective form of punishment, and should, ultimately, be outlawed. With both advocates and challengers constantly debating on this topic, the death penalty and wrongful convictions continue to be hot buttons issues for Americans and people throughout the world.
An innocent man is wrongly executed whilst a man who raped and murdered a mother and her thirteen year old daughter spends the rest of his life with three meals a day and cable television. Which of these is the bigger injustice? The use of the death penalty to punish serious crimes is a very controversial topic and there is much debate surrounding the issue. This paper will briefly discuss arguments supporting and against the use of the death penalty.
Justice System. It is the system of practices and institutions of governments directed at upholding social control, deterring and mitigating crime, or sanctioning those who violate laws with criminal penalties and rehabilitation efforts. Our Justice System is not effectively punishing and rehabilitating criminals to the right punishment of their crimes. Our justice system have three parts to it; which are police, courts, and corrections. Ethics are the foundation of the criminal justice system: It’s what helped us develop the moral reasoning we use, how we define criminal activity, and what we as a society deem as acceptable punishment. It’s an important because our criminal justice system is most effective when it’s operating in an ethical
The criminal justice system was put into place for several reasons. There are four main goals of the criminal justice system that all work together to improve and maintain justice in society. The criminal justice system aims to protect society by preventing future crimes from happening and by keeping criminals from committing more crimes. Another goal of this system is to appropriately punish those who commit a crime after it’s been determined that a crime was committed. In addition to punishment, they aim to rehabilitate criminals so that they can be returned to society in a safe manner. Finally, the criminal justice system’s goal is also to support victims of crime so that they can return to the way they were before they were affected by
Miscarriages of justice illuminate the serious systematic problems that can plague the criminal justice part of the legal system. Such miscarriages show not only the fundamental weakness of an adversarial system, with its focus on ends rather than means, but also the reluctance of the system to consider its own mistakes.
Having prisons should mean having protection for citizens. Well there needs to be some improvements. Prison should be a place where the criminal learns that the crime committed should never have happened. Being a victim of any sort of crime is life changing. These crimes can be life changing in ways that make a person have doubts about all sorts of things in life. Preventing these life changing crimes would be the best way for anyone to feel protected. Crimes happen on a daily a basis, but it is how the society reacts that matters. The criminal should be punished properly and take responsibility according to their crime.
Throughout the world many people tend to question the Criminal Justice System and what role is plays to help the people. From different people, you`ll get many different answers as in how they feel about the Justice System. Some feel as if the Justice System is not hard enough on crime committers so this is why many go back and commit more illegal actions. Others feel as if it’s too hard and people do not deserve the punishment they are receiving. The role the Justice System is to help stop crime committers from continuing down the wrong path and doing the wrong thing. The Justice system plans on doing everything it can to help and rehabilitate those who are doing wrong and have no plan on changing themselves. Not only does it do this but
From an early age, children are taught that murder is morally wrong. In today’s complex society that is impeded by unsettling periods of civil unrest, it is an expectation for everyone to acknowledge and accept that murder is one of the worst crimes individuals can commit. Perhaps it can be said that the death penalty is one of our legal system’s biggest contradictions of itself, as, if someone commits murder (or another heinous crime of that caliber), such ‘murderers’ will, in states that have capital punishment laws, be sent to Death Row and ultimately murdered in order to prevent potential future crimes by such perpetrators. I believe that the death penalty is wrong not only as it is immoral to take a life, but also, such ineffective laws waste money and do not deter crime.
Despite all the pros and cons of capital punishment, society must think about what is truly correct and most practical for our world. Capital punishment is not functional in today’s legal system. There are countless amounts of evidence that proves these legal killings to be ineffective. We, as Americans, must correct this irrational practice before it does anymore permanent damage.
Death penalty is an ancient punishment since time immemorial. It has been used as a way of resolving blood feds and it is more of a thing of the past. The modern contemporary society must adapt a more human procedure to punish those accused of doing wrong. However, it is important to note that there are a minimum number of offenses that an