Many people don’t make it through probation successfully because they find it hard to get a job once they’re convicts. It should be taken into account that those who plead guilty in order to get a plea bargain with probation tend to be innocent, so they aren’t aware of all the difficulties of probation. They later see how expensive probation is because they have to pay for their court fines, their probation officer, and their drug testings weekly(Dalton 05/25/16). Creating so much demand makes those in probation have a hardship in keeping an employment, and averagely they’ll be paying the state $1500 a year for probation. Cases in which this is seen include the cases of Coleman, and Bates. Coleman decided to do probation, but he didn’t complete …show more content…
The main benefit of this system is having prison as a last resort, and having both parties settle the dispute without the traditional criminal justice system(Dalton 05/12/16). However, the drawbacks of the Restorative Justice theory are actually implementing the system because if the population is too big the implementation of probation might not be accepted by the community; plus, it's hard to implement this theory of correction in large societies with large groups of offenders(Dalton 05/12/16). For instance, evidence of this theory of correction has been seen with the case of Lenard when he became a victim of being severely hit in the head, and knocked off his bike by a group of teenagers when he was hanging out on the rich side of town(Bogira 64). Lenard showed the stages of rehabilitation to community, and victim because he received a new house in a nice neighborhood while Caruso received a medium security sentencing for 8 years which ended up turning into 3.5 years because the prison was overcrowded. All harms were rectified and injured parties were restored(Kurbin 274) which was shown by the picture with Lenard and Caruso both smiling together after the incident given the impression that all was forgiven(Bogira 340). Additionally, it is stated that, “the two guys came together and began to heal”(Bogira 340) meaning that the Restorative Justice theory was in full effect for this case in regards to rehabilitation to community and victim as well as restoration of the individual(the convict) into the community after he provided restitution in the form of prison
What is restorative justice? Restorative justice is when youths that were affected by an incident choose to repair the damage that they committed, restore trust, and find a place in the community in which they can fit into society. Not only that, but one of their main focus is to build respectful relationships that can be noticed by everyone (Murthy, 2016, para. 2). The restorative justice approach shares three goals. These three goals are known as accountability, competency, and public safety. Accountability is responsible for making amends and reestablishes the losses to victims and communities. The purpose of accountability is not to obey a curfew, attending counseling, having interaction with a probation officer, or evade the usage of drugs. The full meaning of restorative justice is simply to take full responsibility for the actions that were committed (del Carmen & Trulson, 2006, p. 446). The purpose of competency is basically doing something that’s going to value another person. Not doing an illegal crime doesn’t count as a standard for competency. Getting offenders involved in different activities would value the community. Activities that value the community are work, community service, dispute resolution, and community problem solving. All of these activities help rebuild the offender, victim, and of course the community (del Carmen & Trulson. 2006, p. 446). The last one which is public safety helps offenders get more involved within the community through
Question 1. Both Thomas Mathiesen and Stanley Cohen argue that the alternative criminal justice responses that were presented after the 1970s were not real alternatives (Tabibi, 2015a). With this they are referring to community justice alternatives generally, and Restorative Justice specifically. The argument here is that Restorative Justice cannot be a real alternative because it is finished and is based on the premises of the old system (Mathiesen, 1974). Restorative Justice is not an alternative because it has not solved the issues surrounding the penal system (Tabibi, 2015a). Cohen (1985) supports this sentiment, and suggests that community based alternatives have actually led to a net widening and expansion of the retributive criminal
There was a 19 year old who was driving a stolen car and lost control. When he lost control he killed four people and was sentenced for 47 years in jail. This offender didn’t have a good example to follow while he was growing up. His dad abended him when he was young and was left to be raised by him mom who was an extreme alcoholic (Pope 2011). This is an example the restorative prisons would really help someone who never got proper information growing up on how to behave and things he can do and things he can’t. The restorative prisons would help someone like him by not locking him up for a number of years. This helps the perpetrator because they have more opportunities while in the restorative prison that will help them once they can leave. At the restorative prisons everyone helps out around the building including the perpetrators and that can help them feel better about themselves because they are doing something useful. Also at these prisons the perpetrators are allowed to leave for work as long as they are back by a certain time which also give them more opportunities to make their life better. Some of these prisons also offer training for the perpetrators so they are exposed to more options. Restorative justice ways look into
Restorative justice is a system of criminal justice that emphasizes the rehabilitation of offenders through mending ties with the victims and the community. A better explanation of restorative justice is a theory of justice that emphasizes repairing the harm caused by criminal behavior. It is best accomplished through cooperative processes that include everyone involved. This can lead to transformation of people, relationships and communities.
Restorative justice is a system of criminal justice that focuses on the rehabilitation of offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community at large. Understanding the definition may be really hard to understand, however when we put it in a different form that many can understand it comes down to repair, encounter and transformation. Our book describes restorative justice in three parts as accountability, community protection and competency development (Sieh, 2006).
Restorative justice is a very complex process in the justice system. It is a positive program that helps in the aid of victims of crimes. The process for restorative justice is broken down into steps which map out how the process should take place. According to Johnstone, “Restorative justice is the theory that justice aids the victim and emphasizes the repair of harm caused by unjust or harmful behavior.” In my opinion the restorative justice process is a great accomplishment to the justice system. Restorative justice does not always work as intended but the theory of which it is intended for is enough to be improved upon.
With offender's position, the Canadian justice system has many defects that the restorative justice process appears to get the better off. Traditional justice is seen as punishing offenders for perpetrating crimes. Focus on who the criminal is and how they should be punished for their actions. While restorative justice aims offender to make amends directly, with the people/victims involved. Concerned with the harm done to the victim, the reason behind what motivated the criminal to commit a crime and how everyone involved should be helped and healed. The restorative approach gives a chance for the convict to show remorse and repentance and allowing the victim to forgive, which is a vital part in the grieving process, which is a critical flaw,
Restorative justice is a system of criminal justice that focuses on the rehabilitation of offenders through reconciliation with victims and the community at large. I think this is a good system to help people through tough times. Another system is the death penalty. The death penalty is when you did a really bad crime like kill someone, they have a choice to kill you. They kill you by injecting drugs into your veins. The church is against this because it is wrong to take someone's life from them. I am both for and not for the death penalty. I am for it because if someone did first degree murder they should get killed for it. I say this because when they murdered the person they have hurt everyone that knew the person. That is why I think
One of the benefits is its ability to lower repeat offenders being re-incarcerated. 67.5 % of inmates are rearrested within three years of being released and 25.4% are re-incarcerated. These individuals are a big concern to the public and surrounding community. (Tower) Being sentenced after going through restorative justice often gives the victim and the offender more satisfactory results than the traditional route that the criminal justice system takes. This also reduces the risk of having revenge crimes being committed against the offender.
The criminal justice system is a set of agencies and processes established by governments to control crime and impose penalties on those who violate laws. Different jurisdictions have diverse laws, agencies, and ways of managing criminal justice processes. In recent years, it has been debated that the criminal justice system has two primary and possibility conflicting perspectives known as the retributive justice approach and the restorative justice approach. Retributive justice and restorative justice have contrasting approaches when imposing punishment, that will be explored within this research paper, in regards to the disadvantages and potential advantages resulting from the implementation of it’s polices within the criminal justice system. These two perspectives have been implemented amongst many different criminal justice systems internationally, however the questions still remain, what is justice? And how should justice be served? This debate has created a divide between countries, due to the differing interpretations of justice and it’s response to criminal activity. The statistical information has been extracted from various online sources listed within the references as well as primary and secondary sources, “Prisons” by Haley, James and “Alternatives to Prisons” by Jennifer Skancke.
By that, I mean it seems like the punishment for crime resembles more a drug rehab center rather than an inmate actually doing hard time. In some instances some individuals may need to serve hard time, some individuals may need to be sentenced to the inner walls of prisons kept away from normal society so that they may cause no more harm. Prison in some instances is necessary to keep those who are not fit for normal life away from others to protect the common man. However, in instances where an individual is young, impressionable, it is their first offense, and committed a less severe crime, I could see how this works. Some individuals need guidance and a helping hand out of poverty, some may feel pushed to commit crimes to make ends meet, others may be trapped by addiction and need help in that way. By no means should one non -violent crime ruin someone's life. That is where I think that this restorative justice could find a home, however I would hate to see hardened criminals take advantage of the restorative system at
According to theatlantic.com, ¨On average, the US sends 2 million children to juvenile detention every year….. ¨. Retributive or Restorative Justice has been debated around the world, on which one should be the supreme justice system for juvenile delinquents. The Retributive system, is the justice technique that is used in thousands of countries, and is in majority of all prisons in the country. Restorative Justice is a system that focuses more on the person and the community, as well as the effects and prevention of crime. Victims of criminality deserve the justice of the offense that has been brought upon them.
The criminal justice system views any crime as a crime committed against the state and places much emphasis on retribution and paying back to the community, through time, fines or community work. Historically punishment has been a very public affair, which was once a key aspect of the punishment process, through the use of the stocks, dunking chair, pillory, and hangman’s noose, although in today’s society punishment has become a lot more private (Newburn, 2007). However it has been argued that although the debt against the state has been paid, the victim of the crime has been left with no legal input to seek adequate retribution from the offender, leaving the victim perhaps feeling unsatisfied with the criminal justice process.
Restorative justice has some key restorative values that are vital in the restorative justice conference to make the experience ‘restorative’. Concerning addressing victim needs and concerns means for listening, respecting, being non-judgmental, not blaming the victim and apologizing. The RJ system was bought as an alternative to the criminal justice system to give greater emphasis on victim rights and needs, offender accountability and community involvement. Throughout the essay, there will be an insight into how Restorative Justice addresses needs of victims in terms of the different proponents such as Information provided to victim, restitution/compensation, emotional and practical needs met, participation and involvement of victim and protection of victim, which (Wemmers and Marisa, 2002) as essentials to victims participating in the practice. The two countries that will be addressed will have had restorative justice built out of injustices and over-representation of the current criminal justice system to the indigenous peoples of those countries.
How many inmates were isolated from their communities when they had committed a crime or when they got released from the prisons? And how many effective programs can be helpful for them?Many posts-release prisoners have experienced recidivism and social stigmas due to lack of programs. In fact, restorative justice for people in prison has played a big role in our correctional systems in many different ways.Restorative justice in prison shapes our prisoner 's morals and abilities by providing a suitable technique. Although punishment may play a part in restorative justice techniques, the central focus remains on relationships between the affected parties, and healing reached through a deliberative process guided by those affected parties.( Tsui,2014). For instance, many inmates have attended into reentry programs and educational orientations when they finished their time in prison. These programs cost less money for the government, and inmates can be reintegrated into societies easily. Many post-release prisoners have avoided recidivism after these effective programs taught them the value of lives. This study will examine the importance of restorative justice in prison, which is essential for our correctional facilities. Numerous studies have been done recently which focused on this restorative justice.For example, restorative justice answers the justice question in a different way.(Toews,p.5,2006).