Resurfice Vs Hanke Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
When reviewing the facts of the case Resurfice v. Hanke, it may appear as though it was a clear win for Resurfice inc, however I believe that the Supreme Court of Canada made some key errors in making their decision, ultimately leading the judges to make the wrong decision. Firstly the Supreme court did not place a strong enough emphasis on the design flaws of the Zamboni. As brought forth in court, both the Gasoline tank and the water tank were placed directly beside one another, they were also the same colour. Had the defects of the zamboni not made it so easy to mix the two tanks up, the explosion likely would never had happened. In addition to this Resurfice corp did not do their due diligence to make the Zamboni easier to use. According
Get Access