Return To Rwanda Summary

It is important to study the immediate and gradual causes of the genocide. A good understanding of the devastating Rwandan genocide can help prevent a repeat of such violent events. There were numerous situations that led to the murders, but some could have had a greater impact than others. Two of the biggest causes of the genocide were the assassination of Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana and the hostility between the Hutus and Tutsis. The animosity between the two groups was built up over hundreds of years, while Habyarimana’s assassination was an incident that took place within hours of the beginning of the genocide. Habyarimana’s death seemed to be a trigger for the genocide, but the conflicts between the Hutus and Tutsis could have played an even larger role in the mass murders of thousands of Rwandans. The past relationship between the two groups must be studied in order to understand how they were able to reach a genocide.

Rwanda is a country located in the middle of the African continent. The two ethnic groups present in the country lived in peace under their monarch until the arrival of Europeans. The Belgians arrival into Rwandan is what split the two ethnic groups of the Tutsi and Hutus, making them identify themselves with ID cards. This caused tension between the two groups as the Belgians favored the ethnic Tutsi, and made them the head of the government. Decade’s later Hutu extremists would take over the government and have revenge on the Tutsi. The new government would send out broadcasts calling on Hutus to kill their friends and neighbors. The Rwandan genocide would become the worst genocide to ever happen in Africa and one of the worst in the world. Today Rwanda’s recovery is surprisingly fast with the help of multiple nations and organizations. Rwanda’s recovery is nothing short of a miracle and is an amazing story of a war between two peoples.

The massacre in Rwanda began in April 1994 and ended in July 1994, it lasted a total of 100 days. In Rwanda there are two main ethnic groups the Tutsi and Hutu. The goal of the genocide was to get rid of all of the Tutsi nation (Rwandan Genocide of 1994, March 25, 2011). The Tutsi nation was a popular nation in Rwanda. A man named, Romeo Dellaire, was the general. He led the peacekeeping mission on the behalf of Canada. Romeo Dellaire saw many things in the war and it provoked him to become an advocate for the victims of the genocide (Romeo Dellaire, April 4, 2008). As families of Rwanda finally got to go home after a long 100 days of being in camps, away from home and treated poorly, they were walking to ships. One elderly lady said “I hear there is peace in Rwanda” Rwandan Refugees Treck Home, March 18, 2003). “The first of Rwanda’s long march of refugees was a single file line of ragged but relatively healthy families,” (Rwandan Refugees Trek Home, March 18,

George Santayana once said “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” The Rwanda Genocide is a contemporary representation of the events that occurred during the Armenian Genocide. It is an unforgiving circumstance that even after massacres from the latter and the Holocaust that Genocides still emerge in a world who far too often shuts their door to the idea of intervention. Countries can have an abundance of supplies, unmatchable man-power, and exceptional military equipment, however, with interests in absentia, countries will be reluctant to deploy forces despite exclamations of help. The culmination of the Rwanda Genocide is absolutely an unforgiving portion of history that will be remembered by the victims, the witnesses, and the decision-makers.

The author throws light on historical background of Rwanda which clarifies the circumstances that gave spark to the huge extermination of

Historians do not lie when they say, “History always repeats itself”. Sadly for Rwanda, history did repeat itself with the Rwanda Genocide. Instead of one leader controlling the actions of a powerful military force, Rwanda was a complete chaotic mess, with mass killings of their own people. As Hintjens says it was “one of the highest casualty rates of any population in history from non-natural causes.” Explaining the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda and The Order of Genocide both discuss and write about the pre genocide, social friction, prime factors of the genocide, and the reasoning of killings from both sides.

Historical Context: The Rwanda Genocide was a genocidal slaughter of the Tutsi’s by the Hutu’s, taking place in 1994. This event was a shock to the world, as 1,000,000 Rwandans were killed within the space of 100 days. The atrocity took place following the Civil War, an on-going conflict that had reached a conclusion in 1993, which many Hutu’s weren’t happy with. As a result, in 1994, Hutu’s within the army, police, Government backed militias and the civilian population turned on the Tutsi’s. This mass slaughter marked a significant disruption to World Order, due to the large number of deaths and the inaction of the world to reinstate peace in Rwanda. Nations who faced criticism for their lack of action include; the US, UK and Belgium, who failed to support the UN peacekeeping troops in Rwanda.

The Rwanda Genocide was an unfortunate case where thousands of deaths could have been prevented, but because of irresponsibility and selfishness of global governments’ innocent lives were lost. The Genocide began on April 6, 1994 and was, “initiated by the Hutu political elite and extremists and its military support, their prime targets were the Tutsi, as well as Hutu moderates.” (Hain 2) The Hutu made up majority of the population and government officials and enforced a government-assisted military force to fatally attack the Tutsis. The genocide lasted one hundred days until a rebel Tutsi groups army Hutu armies in a Civil War. Within ten years of the genocide, Rwanda would make exceptional changes to government that would hold genocide participants accountable, within twenty years of the genocide; the economy has grown about 8% an annum. In the next fifty years, Rwanda will continue to see economic and population growth, but will continue to push peace and unity as the genocide continues to cause ethnical tension.

Before long, the massacre has started as war crept up on the Tutsi’s and the Hutu’s. “Rwanda: How the genocide happened” states the start of the genocide was triggered by the death of the Rwanda President Juvenal Habyarimana, who’s plane had been shot down. The Rwandan’s were most certain the shot was from the President’s guard (Sullivan), but the act was pointed to President Paul Kagme, leader of the “Tutsi Rebel group” (“Rwanda: How the genocide happened”). Beforehand, Habyarimana signed a peace record with a rebel group of Tutsi, for his people had thought it was to share his power with Tutsis. Slaughter had taken place less than thirty minutes afterwards (Sullivan). Recruits were being sent throughout the continent to begin the massive

Hotel Rwanda Essay In the movie “Hotel Rwanda”, The Rwandan genocide is described through the experiences of George Rutaganda, Colonel Oliver, and Paul Rusesabagina. Their experiences explain the horrors of the genocide which began on April, 1994. Before the genocide, the Belgians controlled Rwanda and they felt that the Tutsis were superior towards the Hutus, so they treated the Tutsis much better by giving them better jobs and treated them with more respect. When the Belgians left Rwanda in 1962, Rwanda and Burundi became two separate countries, and the Tutsis were forced to flee.

Over the course of hundreds of years, Genocides have been a major problem in the world. A genocide is a mass killing of people by a group or nation. One of the worst genocides that had happened was the Rwandan Genocide. Rwanda is a country located in East Africa, between Uganda and Tanzania. There was a dispute in the government between the Hutus and the Tutsis for many years. In 1994, the genocide had begun and millions of people were slaughtered. During the Rwandan genocide, the Hutu government killed the Tutsis until Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) and United Nations (UN) stopped the Hutus; the survivors are still haunted by the horrifying memories.

In the 1990’s, the mass media concentrated all its thoughtfulness on a refugee catastrophe. This was connected to the Rwanda Genocide, and the United Nation provided assistance for those distressed by these event (Herta, 2014, p. 263-264). Prior to this event The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) structured themselves and invaded the country. They had a purpose to force the Hutu dictatorship into reforming the country. They wanted the Tutsi regime to return back into the country. As per Herta (2014), The Great Lakes region was affected by the event, just about fifty-six million people lived below poverty levels, and this led to the greatest humanitarian effort of the decade. The target of this paper is to explain how this event was a genocide.

In this paper I will be discussing what happened during the Rwanda Genocide. This event took place during 1994 but only lasted around 100 days during these 100 days about 800,000 thousand Tutsis were slaughtered by the Hutu, this event actually started around 1933 but tension built on leading to the second genocide of Rwanda. The Hutu and Tutsi people of Rwanda Africa you could are of close descent but are very didn’t, they would exchange cattle or, the females of their tribe would be married off to the other tribe at first these two got along fine until the Europeans showed up.

The study of Rwanda’s history is primarily reviewed within the context of the 1994 Rwandan genocide also referred to as the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi. This focus is understandable as over one million died within a three-month period. It resulted in a dramatic shift from past history as the nation tried to rebuilt itself socially through the context of a united ethnicity of ‘Rwandan’ rather than previous ethnic divisions of Hutu, Tutsi and Twa. For many researchers, the ‘new’ Rwanda began with the ending of the genocide. Over the past twenty-two years, public policies are interpreted as effects of the genocide. This is problematic, as focusing primarily on the genocide overlooks important themes and understandings that stemmed from important moments of history. This is especially true in relations to how

From the names and institutions that appeared in the transition process it was clear that the transition to an Obama Presidency will not, in the short term, reflect the kind of change that was promised in the election campaign. Instead of a future of sustainable peace and transformation, one saw a re-emergence and recycling of the same militarists such as Susan Rice emerging as a top official of the US foreign policy establishment. When mass killings erupted in Rwanda in April 1994, Rice was serving on the National Security Council and was part of a coterie of U.S. officials who took little action to stop violence. Even after the reality of genocide in Rwanda had become irrefutable, when bodies were shown choking the Kagera River on the