Review

When a pharmaceutical company creates a new drug, it has to go through the FDA and is required to submit a New Drug Application (NDA) to the FDA. The FDA reviews the application to assure that there is an objective proof that the proposed drug is safe and effective. If the

The original deadline to submit a comment regarding the proposed rule was August 31, 2015, but since has been extended to September 30, 2015. There are several comments I would submit to the FDA about this regulation. It clearly states in the docket that [insert]. My comment is as follows:

be used as they could interfere with the testing, so animals may have to undergo

Extra-label use of drugs in treating animals is allowable only by licensed veterinarians within the context of a valid veterinarian-client-patient relationship, and does not include drug use in treating animals by the layman (except under the supervision of a licensed veterinarian).

Even if the chemical is shown promising for helping the animals it does not automatically mean that it would be safe for humans.

“There stands an authorized requirement for documentation searching for substitutes and an explanation to why these substitutes were not found to be suitable or how substitutes were incorporated into the experimental design.” “The American College of Laboratory Animal Medicine Foundation has helped to improve animal welfare by funding grants to study diverse means of animal practice.” (Harm and Suffering)

I’m about to write y’all the most subjective review ever. Except I’m conscious of my subjectivism. So henceforth, feast your eyes, and minds, on what I like to call my objective portrayal of a highly subjective review. You’re welcome.

Pursuing this further Animal Testing should be a discarded practice due to its inaccuracy in treating diseases in a timely manner. Within the article, stop animal testing it

As advancements are made in science and technology that relates to the care of patients, it is critical for nurses to be aware of the treatments that have been proven to be evidence-based. Systematic research reviews (SRR) are considered to have the highest ranking or level of evidence falling under level 1 evidence for reliability, validity, and least amount of error (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p.607). The aim of this paper is to critique the chosen SRR related to core temperature obtainment in children, relevance of the research problem to nursing practice, rigor of the research found in the SRR to include levels of evidence and designs of included studies, the clarity of findings, summarized findings in the SRR, and the implications for practice.

Based on these preclinical studies on animal, Merck submitted their Investigational New Drug (IND 65, 495) application to FDA was on August 2002.4

In January 2006, the FDA issued a Direct Final Rule, which proposed a change in the cGMP rules, to exempt investigational drugs and biologics from certain cGMP regulations in Phase 1 human clinical trials. The purpose of the proposed change was to “help streamline and promote the drug development process,” and to reduce the burden on companies researching new drugs (Federal Register). Under the changes, drugs and biologics undergoing Phase 1 trials would no longer be subject to some of the GMP regulations outlined in 21 CRF 211, from the Code of Federal Regulations, and the manufacturing of drugs used in Phase 1 trials would largely be governed by the more general The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, instead of the cGMP regulations

Article: Carroll, J. (2002). Play Therapy: the children’s views, Child and Family Social Work, 7, pg 177-187

Ninety-two percent of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don't work. (Top Five, (n.d)). Everything we use from medications and vaccines to makeup and hygiene products; such as shampoo, conditioner all have to be tested and deemed safe for human use and consumption. One way to test to insure these things are safe is to test these products on animals. There are many reasons why animal testing should not be allowed, first being that the results vary greatly between humans and animals, secondly it is unethical and abusive and third there are other methods available to test products. Although people say they’re just animals, product testing on animals is unethical and abusive, and there are alternative options to test.

The use of animals in research is a widely controversial topic in today?s scientific community and raises an important ethical issue. Do animals make appropriate research subjects and is it absolutely necessary to use animals to test the safety of products? Animal testing can be referred to in a number of ways including animal research and animal experimentation, all of which involve experiments performed on animals to test the safety and effectiveness of things ranging anywhere from cosmetics to medication for humans. Products that commonly use animal testing include drugs, supplements, pesticides, cosmetics, food additives, household products and industrial chemicals. This debate affects many people both directly and indirectly because new medications and products must first pass tests in animals before they can be approved for human use. Although many people argue that these new products should first be tested in animals before ever being administered to a human, I believe that the use of animals to test these products is not necessary and there are many new alternative methods that can be used to determine the success of these products in humans.

To write a review about a film which contains not only the magical combo of Shahrukh Khan-Kajol-Karan Johar but also something different from melodramatic love story or usual remake of hardcore commercial film is pleasurable.My Name Is Khan has a excellent point to a class of audience who likes to watch Shahrukh Khan in a different characteristic. But the film does not show the excellence enough to get a perfect worship from all audiences and critics.