Review Of ' Elementary School '

In addition to raising general awareness of bullying at school, something must also be done to address the rising trend of bullying in the digital world. In the past, bullying primarily occurred in person. There were no other avenues for this victimization to take place. However, with the rise of digital

The word 'bullying' has developed a very traditional definition amongst society: a face-to-face interaction involving either verbal abuse and/or physical abuse. With the technological advances that have occurred within the past 15 years, bullying has become anything but traditional. Children and teens have more access to the Internet and to social media platforms more than ever before, thus allowing them to avoid face-to-face interaction. Within the past 15 years, there has been a significant rise of cyberbullying in the youth demographic (ages 12-18) (Slonje, Smith, & Frisén, 2013). In order to understand what the difference between traditional bullying and cyberbullying is, one must familiarize themselves with the definition of cyberbullying.

Cyberbullying is a relatively new threat, and it is very similar to traditional bullying. Despite the fact that cyberbullying and traditional bullying both share the common goal of harassment, cyberbullying differs from traditional bullying in that it does not stop at the schoolyard, and can continue when the victim is far away from the aggressor. It is just as devastating as common bullying, and sometimes is even more damaging. Professors Sameer Hinduja and Justin W. Patchin note in their journal, “Cyberbullying Creates Dangerous Stress and Anxiety”, that cyberbullying affects anywhere between 10-40% of students (contingent on their age group) (par. 1). J.D. Kelly A. Albin, in her article “Bullies in a Wired World”, defines cyberbullying as “…the ‘willful and repeated harm inflicted through use of computers, cell phones, and other electronic devices’” (157). It is caused by the fact that children feel their actions are mitigated when they use social media, as it creates the illusion of indirectness, and its effects range anywhere from mild depression to suicide.

This type of bullying can take place 24 hours a day and is brought into the student’s home where it was once considered safe. Cyber-bullying has changed the world's view on this age-old subject, meanwhile the media suggests that bullying is an epidemic by reporting on tragedies that happen among our youth shedding light on the problem. One thing everyone can agree on is that the internet has provided a non-stop opportunity to bully. Nicole Edgington was celebrating her 17th birthday at a concert when it would be turned upside down by cyber-bullying. A senior in California was wrongly accused of turning some students in for coming to school intoxicated. Because the students assumed she had turned them in, they began a barrage of social media attacks along with text message threats. Nicole wrote an article, the girl who got even: A true cyber bullying story, explaining how she rose above the threats and daily negative texts. It takes courage to stand up and face your fears especially when you feel isolated. Nicole’s mom started to speak out on cyberbullying and found that teens wanted to hear other teens. Nicole would face her bully’s by speaking out about the behavior. The media has suggested that bullying is an epidemic, reporting on tragedies that happen among our youth shedding light on an age-old problem. When bullying moves to the internet it becomes more

Societal norms in the United States in terms of adolescents utilizing the Internet once as an additional source of communication has become the primary mode of communication. Today, “92% of teens proclaim they go online daily to check popular social media platforms such as Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram, and Twitter among others” (Lenhart 1). The alteration from physical communication to online communication has exposed a dangerous interaction for social relationships known as cyberbullying. In order to understand cyberbullying, it is critical to understand traditional bullying. Traditional bullying thrives off on aggressive behavior that is repetitive and involves a real or perceived power imbalance. Cyberbullying is a form of violence predominantly seen in teens that has the potential to lead to long-term harm. It involves the use of technology such as cell phones and the Internet with the primary objective of

In the 21st century technology has led to a new form of bullying, cyber bullying (Dhariff & Hoff, 2007). Over the past 30 years bullying have incremented rapidly worldwide, affecting people of all ages. Whether it’s done via the internet or the traditional way, bullying has always being around, affecting more than 200 million children worldwide (Kandersteg Declaration Against Bullying in Children and Youth, 2007). According to a research study conducted by Juvonen & Gross (2008) and Patchin & Hinduja (2009), cyber bullying and bullying are often interdepended (Beran & Li, 2007; Willard, 2007b.). Recent studies on cyber bullying showed that in every 10 Australian kids who were bullied online, 84% of them were also bullied in school (No Bullying, 2014). Bullying is referred to the repeated verbal, social,

In addition, Martin makes the subtle claim that technology accelerates the rate of bullying, to the point where it is replacing physical bullying. It is noted that cyber bullying is nearly impossible to oversee due to the fact that children are not only intimidated of the social repercussions they will face from exposing their cyber bullies, but because they also fear that they will no longer have access to the internet. Finally, Martin claims that implementing anti-bully policies is not enough to combat bullying. Martin believes that the quality of these policies must be thoroughly regulated and consistently reinforced in order to have any legitimate effects in practice. The author concludes by repeating the statement that bullies and victims are considerably likely to have behavior problems, and briefly mentioning that a combination of being both victimized at school and home produces a significant chance of developing clinically defined sociopathic characteristics.

This proposal will focus on the topic of cyberbullying. More specifically, cyberbullying vs. traditional offline bullying will be examined. This objective of this paper is to determine whether or not cyberbullying is a worse form of bullying than traditional offline bullying; whether the former has more of an impact than the latter. Currently, there is still some debate about this issue. While many claim that cyberbullying is worse than offline bullying, there are those who claim that physical bullying has more of an impact (Lenhart, 2009). Others do not say this directly; however, they highlight the type of bullying as being more important than whether the bullying occurs online or offline (Bauman, 2012).

My first source is a scholarly journal article from the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships that defines what cyber bullying and online harassment is, as well as the types of roles young people fulfill in different types of cyber bullying. The article details the various platforms on which harassment can take place, and the forms in which harassment can present itself. The main point of the scholarly article is to examine statistics regarding bullying in the age of the Internet, using key word such as bully/victims, media, and retaliation. I will use this source in my essay to define what cyber bullying is, and familiarize the reader with various terms, before I discuss the causes and effects of such behaviour.

Cyber-bullying which occurs in the virtual world which many teenagers are active in. The Internet creates a virtual world that can result in very real consequences for people's lives .Hence this, challenges technologies that are designed to provide adequate protection for children, which are being rapidly developed by parents, schools and policy makers (King, 2010). Even though the temptation of hastily discovering a solution to cyber-bullying prominent among most policymakers, they should gradually create a solution and carefully considering the possible consequences that the solution may pose in the future. This report aims to investigate the state of cyber bullying in American schools. It will include

Social Networking has taken bullying to the extreme. Before advanced technology, children and teenagers were troubled by school bullies. Today, they are targeted by bullies via internet. Most people undergo some form of bullying in life. Growing up, I experienced the typical name calling and spiteful comments. I also dealt with minor cases of virtual bullies. These bullies are known as cyber bullies. I find this topic compelling because it’s a matter that has spiraled out of control.

This study investigates some of the different behaviors that are portrayed by cyberbullies, and whether or not cyberbullying is another main type of bullying. Cyberbullying is defined as aggression that occurs through modern technological devices, and specifically mobile phones or the internet (Slonje, R. & Smith P.K. 2008). “Bullying” is often defined as being an aggressive, intentional act or behavior that is carried out by a group or an individual repeatedly over time against a victim who cannot easily defend him or herself” (Whitney & Smith, 1993; Olweus, 1999). Cyberbullying is simply another form of traditional bullying, just with the satisfaction of anonymity and convenience. However, cyberbullying has recently surfaced within the past decade, as technology became modernized.

Internet usage in children and adolescents has been increasing in a steadily fashion in the past number of years and with the increase in internet usage, a new form of bullying has developed – Cyber bullying. Cyber bullying can be defined as “the electronic posting of mean-spirited messages about a person,” (Merriam-Webster, 2012). This form of bullying can come through various mediums including but not limited to text messages, emails, videos, and social networking sites. There is an overwhelming amount of information that defines cyber bullying, identifies the demographics of bullies and victims of cyber bullying, and identifies the outcomes of cyber bullying on victims. More focus needs to be placed on who the perpetrators

“Twenty-five percent of teenager’s report that they have experienced repeated bullying by their cell phone, or on the internet; victims of cyberbullying are more likely to suffer from low self-esteem and to consider suicide.” Thousands of teens are victims of bullying every day, and with the today’s use of technology, the bullying does not stop when the school day ends. The bullying follows the victims home accessible for everyone anywhere right at their fingertips. The internet is home to cyberbullying; a never-ending platform targeting thousands of individuals exposing, abusing, or humiliating every day causing internal hurt to the victims. Why is the internet such an easy place to create and share the harsh channels of cyberbullying?

For such a long time, physical bullying has been the largest problem schools and parents had to face with their children, but now another form of bullying has arisen; cyber bullying. In society today, teens are drawn cell phones, laptops, and other technological advancements. Social media is a way for many teens and adolescents to interact with one another and share countless happenings of their personal lives. Cyber bullying occurs when individuals use the internet to send or comment cruel and unnecessary messages to another. In its various forms cyber bullying includes, indirect and direct harassment, posting inappropriate pictures, impersonating another being, or just being plain cruel. Although anyone can become a victim of cyber bullying, improper use of the internet can further induce harassment, due to the adolescents desire to use modern day technologies. The harassers could be classmates, online “friends’’, or anonymous users. One barrier that is difficult to overcome is determining who is responsible for the attacks online, because many bullies hide behind fake usernames or profiles to protect their real identity, which is commonly known as “hiding behind a screen”. (Bonanno 2013). The motives for a cyber-bully are never clear, some might say