Revised Law of Ownership of Handguns Essay

Lupica, Mike. "Shame on U.S.: How Many Tiny Coffins Do We Need Next Time?" New York

Heller there was another Supreme Court case called McDonald V. Chicago. In this case the U.S supreme court had to rule on if in fact the Second Amendment right which declares,” A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”, applies to the states of the U.S. In the city of Chicago prohibited a person from possessing any kind of fire arm unless the person had a “legal” registration for the gun. The clause of this rule that made it questionable to the person’s legal rights is that the law made it so that registrations of most handguns were prohibited. This therefore making it illegal to own many hand guns, violating a person’s right to bear arms yet again. A group of people took this to court claiming that the ban on hand guns made it so that they were exposed to criminals therefore they couldn’t protect them self. The group filed a claim that there second and fourteenth amendment rights were being violated. Chicago stated that Heller, the case in 2008 stated above, did not say that the ruling thet had made applied to any state. Rose states that in the court had to rule on “whether the right to bear arms was a fundamental right protected by the constitution and therefore applicable to the

Gun control has long been a controversial topic in the United States. In 1791 the Second Amendment was ratified in the Constitution (Shallope, 1982). Since its ratification, the amendment has been interpreted two different ways depending on the acceptance or opposition to the issue (Shallope, 1982). Those opposing lax gun laws interpret the Second Amendment as only applying to the prohibition of the federal government interfering with state militia; it does not apply to individual citizens (Shallope, 1982). Laws concerning individual citizens rights to purchase, own, and carry a gun vary from state to state. Even though license requirements still differ across states, as of the year 2013, when Illinois became the last state to permit the carrying of a concealed handgun in public, the act of concealed carry is now legal in all 50 states (ProCon, 2017). In particular, laws concerning the possession of guns on college campuses fluctuate from state to state and even throughout individual institutions (LaPoint, 2010). Currently, 18 states have issued

The concept of total gun-control is viewed by many as the ban of all firearms for civilian possession, as well as severe restrictions on the certain types of firearms allowed for civilian possession. In very recent years we can examine the effects of instituting sever gun restriction in cities and the negative effects that it had. Washington DC and Chicago provide

Some States in the United States are debating whether or not to set the Gun Control Law. Some people oppose this law while others support this it. I support the Gun Control Law. I support the law because their will be fewer suicides, less gun related deaths and people will less likely make attempts on shootings

“Right to bear arms” from second amendment in the Constitution was adopted in 1791, this is 21st century, given the statistics of how high gun violence in USA has gone up compared to its neighbor country, it is about time to do something about it. Although guns can be used in self-defense, according to Law Center To Prevent Gun Violence Statistics, the evidences shows that the presence of guns in people’s home make them more vulnerable. Statistics shows that guns kept in the home are more likely to be involved in a fatal or nonfatal unintentional shooting, and criminal assault or suicide attempt than to be used to injure or kill in self-defense. Gun is more likely to be used to vent frustration by killing or injuring an innocent person in the

The United States Constitution’s Bill of Rights states that the Second Amendment which is the right to bear arms which is allowing us to have weapons in our hands; many individuals are becomingly increasingly unsure of where the line is drawn on being able to have a gun and what prevents people from using them for harm. Some people have argued that even though the Second Amendment does protect our individual rights to have the option to own arms, that it should give the government authority to ban high-crime communities from using handguns. Gun violence embraces every town in the United States.

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The constitution is clearly saying all citizens have the right to be able to own and carry a weapon or firearm. On June 26, 2008, in District of Columbia v. Heller, the United States Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home and within federal enclaves (Cornell 1). This is showing how our founding fathers supported the right to bear arms.

Today, there are an estimated 357 million firearms in the United States. Today, there has been an increase in mass shootings since the year 2000. With this sharp rise, debates have begun on how to solve the problem. In order to combat this rise, some argue that there should be restrictions on who, and what type of guns an individual is allowed to possess. For example, Los Angeles, California, is notorious for having some of the strongest restrictions on firearms. Gun control laws such as prohibiting residents to own a handgun or rifle magazine that fits more than ten rounds, has been issued to quell this problem. This requires residents who possess these items to remove, sell or transfer them out of city limits. This law, with the intent to increase the safety of citizens, has in turn taken away their second amendment right to bear arms. Gun control supporters justify this disregard for the second amendment on the basis that the general welfare of the American people will increase. These restrictions although in the name of safety, have taken away the rights of law-abiding

Civil liberties are legal constitutional protections against the government. “Protection of civil liberties is basic to American political values” (ushistory.org); however, the issue of defining these liberties is often complex. Disputes about civil liberties often end up in court and can possibly be appealed up to the federal level. The U.S. Supreme Court is the interpreter of the civil liberties, and their decision may end up changing the country.

Changing the gun control laws in the United States has been a hot topic, especially with the recent tragic stories. Gun control is the set of laws that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification and use of firearms. Guns are an unsafe weapon that cannot be stopped, which is causing a big problem in the United States. Some people believe that there should be stricter gun laws and some think otherwise. Stricter gun control laws will not make the United States a safer environment.

However, the Courts have “universally agreed that the right provided by the Second Amendment is not absolute and that many kinds of gun legislation designed to protect public safety remain valid.” Gun control supporters argue that the Second Amendment only represents the states rights to maintain militias while opponents of gun control argue that the Second Amendment protects the individual's right to possess firearms. Two U.S. Supreme Court cases, District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, redefined the meaning of the Second Amendment. In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the Court overturned Washington, D.C.’s long standing ban on handgun possession and the requirement that all firearms presiding in a residence must be “stored unloaded and disassembled or bound by a locking device (a requirement which had no exception for self-defense).” While in the case of McDonald v. City of Chicago, the Court ruled that “the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments in addition to the federal government and invalidated handgun bans in Chicago and Oak Park, Illinois,” both wins for opponents of gun

The case involves the legal authority of a legislative body of a municipality to ban hand guns within their jurisdiction. The Court had previously struck down a similar law banning hand guns enacted by the District of Columbia, basing its ruling on its interpretation of the Second Amendment. Calling the court's logic "flawed" the new ruling extends the application of the amendment to all states and cities, rendering Chicago's ban unenforceable.

What is known as Civil liberties, it is guaranteed by the Constitution, that an individual’s freedom will be protected from the power that the government may hold towards them. According to our classroom textbook, American Government (413), it is stated that by the Constitution guaranteeing an individual’s freedom it is seen as a negative thing. It is negative due to it being stated in a negatively matter or form. Civil liberties are disclosed in the Bill of Rights, which are the Ten Amendments in the Constitution. There are some civil liberties listed in the Constitution. One example of an Amendment that is stated in the United States Constitution is in Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment states that a person has the right to be free from any

Bonus points will be awarded for cases of a Leftist media outlet detailing it’s plans to confiscate guns via Intergalactic Background Checks and registration. [Yes, they are out there – extra points for digging them up!]