Revolt Of The Homosexual Analysis

Both terms ‘gender’ and ‘sexuality’ are very common, broad and the meaning of it differs from person to person. Eugenically the term ‘gender’ is defined to have socially composed roles, activities, behaviours, and peculiarity that a given society considers right for men and women (WHO, 2015). Whereas the term ‘sexuality’ has various meanings, it is described as feeling or having attraction or having sexual thoughts and preferences towards same sex or opposite sex (reachout.com, 2015). This essay will explore Pascoe’s (2005) article on sexualised insult ‘fag’ by American teenage boys. It will also focus on the racialized nature of this ‘fag’ discourse. As it is not the only identity related to homosexual men but can briefly associate to heterosexual men as well. Another sexualised insult ‘slut’ depicted in Attwood’s (2007) work has many meanings and has changed overtime. This will be illustrated by highlighting how the word ‘slut’ was used to define women sexually and their struggle over class, race and generation. The term ‘bitch’ explored in Crawford & Popp (2003) study share similar perspective to Attwood’s work where talking about sexuality or gender would involve making assumption about race and class. This will help present the different identities which people use to define their sexuality and gender such as gay, fag, slut and bitch in terms of race and class. This will be explored in various academics work. This implies that understanding about sexuality and gender in

Compulsory heterosexuality was originally written in part to “challenge the erasure of lesbian existence from so much of scholarly feminist literature, an erasure which I felt (and feel) to be not just anti-lesbian, but anti-feminist in its consequences, and to distort the experience of heterosexual women as well,” Rich states in Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence (1980). The assumption made by Rossi, that women are “innately” sexually oriented only toward men, and that made by Lessing, that the lesbian is simply acting out of her bitterness toward men, are by no means theirs alone; these assumptions are widely current in literature and in the social sciences. (Rich,

On the off chance that society keeps on empowerring men and typify ladies, our way of life and society will fall flat. The generalizations should be separated, and people ought not be taken a gander at in light of the average standards, everybody is diverse and qualified for fairness. "Correspondence assumes an imperative part in forming our sexual orientation characters and through communications with others we can instruct ourselves on how society characterizes our parts" (Signorelli, 2000).

Differences within people are what make each individual unique, and accepting differences is mandatory to live in a peaceful environment. Homosexuality is a widespread phenomenon that has been around for centuries. Discrimination against homosexuals is a critical issue that is affecting many lives around the world. Homosexuality is prohibited in some countries while it is encouraged and protected in others. Homosexuality is observed in the animal kingdom in a large umber of species, thus it can be concluded that it is a natural phenomenon and not a human deviation off nature. Some cultures accept and embrace homosexuality, while others are strictly against it; the cultures that are

As the physical structure of society has changed year after year, so has its mindset. As many would note, the 21st century people have developed more of an understanding and knowledge on why society acts the way it does and what issues hold more prominence than others. These post-modernists have delved into the mind of the past and uncovered what they believe to be the truth of how humanity once interacted, specifically, when it came to the Bible and its interpretation of homosexuality.

On View of Homosexuality Continuum, I probably be 4.5. For me 4.5 mean when you see some who is a homosexual, you say it’s their business, so I don’t care. Because I’m not the one who have to deal with God for loving someone who is the same sex as you

“How we think about sexuality is conditioned and inhibited by a complicated history and, to make our problems worse, that history is in the power of those who have necessarily been antagonistic to women for a very long time. Males generally have been economically and socially superior to women since they became the primary producers and possessors of private property.” (Murphy Robinson, 1984: 251)

The author states, “heterosexism, or ‘the view that heterosexuality is the “norm” for all social/sexual relationships and...certainly permeates many discussions of sexism” (Dahl, 2015). This shows that there is an expectation that the female gender is automatically presumed to be interested only in the male gender, and this correlates to sexism. Heterosexuality is considered the norm in today’s society; however, that is stereotyping against the gender, which leads to sexism. This also leads to the assumption that females must behave like the stereotypical girl. The author states, “femininity [and] the restrictions it placed on me, was a learned role” (Dahl, 2015). This explains ever since she was young, expectations and gender roles were given to her such as learning to only be interested in the opposite gender and acting lady like. It it also stated that sexism “is rooted in the presumption that female and male are rigid, mutually exclusive, ‘opposite’ sexes” (Dahl, 2015). This tells the reader opposite sexes should only be attracted to one another and not the same sex, creating an unrealistic expectation since people cannot control their brain’s sexual interest. The researcher agrees with all of the statements above because they are clearly portrayed through everyday events. The article covers the stereotyping of relationship requirements in a thorough manner.

The consequences of breaking the norms implemented by society when regarding gender specifications can result in an individual being dubbed as queer. Although, society has recently been able to understand and assess the damage caused by foolish presumptions surrounding gender expectations, conventional ways of thinking still persist.

Whitehead (2002: 166) writes, “men’s complicity in sexist or homophobic behaviour arises not from their core sexuality, but from a desire not to be excluded from male groups; not to be cast out and declared ‘not a male/man, like us’.” Consequently heterosexual masculinity is defined in opposition to racial and sexual minorities, and women. Gorer (1964: 129) states, “The lives of most American men are bounded, and their interests daily curtailed by the constant necessity to prove to their fellows, and to themselves, that they are not sissies, not homosexuals.” This, according to Kimmel (2001: 279), results in men inflating traditional rules of masculinity, a consequence of which is not only homophobic acts, but also the predation of women. Consequently, homophobia, racism and sexism are closely interlinked, as women, gay men and other minorities become the ‘other’ against which heterosexual men construct their identities. Kimmel (2001:284)

Being part of a stigmatized group often accompanies a sense of negative self-worth. This association can become increasingly evident if an individual is constantly faced with adversities that make the individual feel devalued. Specifically, individuals in the LGBTQIA (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, Asexual) population have unique experiences that proliferate the rate of being marginalized. This marginalization can negatively affect the individual and can be portrayed in multiple ways. At the society level, Herek & Garnets (2007) coined the term sexual stigma to describe this phenomenon in relation to sexual minorities. Sexual stigma, in the researcher’s terms, means that there is an inferior status in relation to a society that does not tolerate of any nonheterosexual behavior, identity, or relationship (Herek & Garnets, 2007). An example of this stigma would be a religion frowning upon a homosexual relationship and not tolerating or devaluing the homosexual couple. Herek also describes this at an individual level: sexual prejudice means “negative attitudes based on sexual orientation” (Herek, 2000), as a result, the individual may feel devalued through various means such as not being able to build relationships with individuals who oppose homosexuality. Both at the societal and individual level can include: prejudice -which is a negative attitude that an individual may associate to an identity (in this case an nonheterosexual identity)-, blatant

Double standards is one of the many reasons why lesbian behavior is more widely accepted than homosexual men. Men are held to a higher standard and society often set higher expectations for men than women. Society’s perspective of men is that

Being male or female is the natural sex of a human. It is their physical, real nature. Being manly or female is the sexual orientation of a humanities. It is a demonstration of decision—the way a man carries on. The current social mantra is that these two, sexual orientation and sex, are inconsequential to one another. Men, they say, can be ladylike, manly, or both; and ladies can be female, manly, or both. This is the subjectivity meaning of sexual orientation that it is up to either sex's self-assertive

The realization of the homosexuality in the modern western world as a cultural, sexual and a social category has been a result of complex power relations that surround sexuality and gender. The acceptance of homosexuality in the society has met its fair share of resistance and skepticism. The view that homosexuality can be in the same league as heterosexual has led it to be viewed as a normal behavioral and moral standard (Gallagher & Baker, 2006). Inasmuch as the skeptics may not want to accept the existence of homosexuality studies show that the habit is rampant today with many gay people coming out in the open. Of interest is the political acceptance of homosexuality with passing gay rights so that it can be recognized by law. This move has given homosexuals the ability to engage in legal entities like marriage (Gallagher & Baker, 2006).

Being separated from a parent is thus not a bad dream, but a fact that life that Paul is just learning to accept. The family system providing no support, it is natural for people to turn to other social groups and this is where friendship assumes central stage. Gradually friends replace the warmth lacking in familial ties.