Rewards before Performance Is Complete

When majority of the people think about the contracts, bilateral agreements come to their mind. As in its most basic form, as bilateral contract is an agreement at least between two people or more groups. Most personal and business contracts would fall into this category. Whereas the simplest way to understand unilateral business contract is by analyzing the word 'unilateral.' In its general terms, as unilateral contracts will involve an action undertaken by either one person or by any group alone. However in contract law, unilateral contracts will allow only one person to make an agreement or promise.

An offeror will have made an offer where it appears to a reasonable person in the position of the offeree that an offer was intended.

An acceptance of an offer is “ a manifestation of assent to the terms thereof made by the offeree in a manner invited or required by the offer.

if this is done, Wessel can not create a contract by accepting the revoked offer, Gregory. so as long as the contract do not express that how many time or how long Gregory offer Wessel monologue, he still have right to revocation the offer.

Acceptance-This basically means that the terms of the offer have been clearly understood and agreed to through consent and assent and at no time will the terms be changed.

Specific Praise. Specific praise includes verbal or written statements to a student that recognize a desired or correct behavior. Praise can function as a tool for instruction and for increasing social and academic behaviors. To be effective, the student must view the attention provided through praise as pleasurable or motivational (Curran, 2017). Specific praise promoted more on‐task behavior than positive praise and significantly increased academic self‐concept (Bizo, 2004). Offering specific praise will help Sam because it sends a message that the teacher is aware of the effort he is putting into staying on task. As time goes on, Sam will desire the teacher’s positive statements. He understands that the statements are the result of him remaining on task and reaching his six-week goal. Sam will also develop an understanding of how to meet the teacher’s expectation. In the end, Sam will mature and advance in his academics. As he matures, the need for constant specific praise will become unnecessary. The added benefit of specific praise is to the teacher. The high levels of stress and emotional exhaustion while attempting to teach in the classroom with Sam will diminish as he progresses.

* Reward for good performance, for example, positive appraisal. Before a company promotes an employee to a particular

An offer allows the person or business to whom the offer is made to, to reasonably expect that the offering party is willing to be bound by the offer based on the terms proposed thus these terms of an offer must be define as well as certain.

The offer and acceptance model is flawed- only an agreement is necessary. In order to fully comprehend this statement, we must first establish what constitutes and offer and what constitutes acceptance. “An offer is a statement by one party of willingness to enter into a contract on stated terms, provided that these terms are, in turn, accepted by the party to whom the offer is addressed”. Acceptance is “…an unqualified expression of ascent to the terms proposed by the offeror”. The “Offer and acceptance model” is based on the court’s adopt the “mirror image” rule of contractual formation. Applying the definitions stated above, we can take this to mean that there must be a clear and unequivocal offer which must be matched by an equally

Reward Management (RM) has been defined as the distribution of monetary and non-monetary rewards to employees in an effort to align the interests of the employees, the organisation, and its shareholders (O’Neil, 1998). In addition O’Neil (1998) also suggests that a RM system can serve the purpose of attracting prospective job applicants, retaining valuable employees, motivating employees, ensuring legal requirements relating to direct and indirect rewards are not violated, assisting the company in achieving human resource and business objectives, and ultimately assisting the organisation in obtaining a competitive advantage.

In BROGDEN v METROPOLITAN RAIL CO it was held the railway company had accepted by placing orders since the amendment of the document, and in TRENTHAM LTD v ARCHITAL LUXFER the court used the 'reasonable man' to identify whether or not there has been acceptance. Both cases seemed to have reasonable outcomes; therefore the courts had been provided with satisfactory rules to help them reach a appropriate verdict. There are various different rules regarding acceptance. There must be a communication of acceptance from the offeree to the offeror. The case of YATES BUILDING v PULLEYN deals whether there had been a prescribed acceptance or not. It was held that there was no practical difference to the offeror therefore the acceptance method was binding. However in the case of ENTORES LTD v MILES FAR EAST CORPORATION there was no prescribed acceptance, yet it was held that the contract was formed in England as that was there acceptance had been received by telex. Other rules that can be used to decide whether there has been acceptance include a waiver of communication of acceptance; silence, which isn't a valid acceptance; ignorance, generally there isn't a binding contract; and acceptance via post using the postal rule. The postal rule can often be misused, as it states that a contract has been formed as

In the first scenario, it is identifiable that a unilateral offer requesting the performance of an action by Ron, by way of answering some questions put forward by Sally about a product which she was promoting, has been made. This offer is identified as being a unilateral one for the reason that Sally has promised Ron a chance to win two free return air tickets in any destination he chooses in exchange for the service of answering her marketing questions. In response to her offer, Ron accepts by way of answering her questions and as Poole states, “The general rule is that…performance of the requested act constitutes both the acceptance and the consideration to support the offeror’s promise to pay the reward”. It has also been established in Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company Ltd. that conduct is proof of acceptance of a proposal.

Unilateral contracts involve an action undertaken by one person or group alone. In contract law, unilateral contracts allow only one person to make a promise or agreement. Unilateral contractts are purely one sided. They are made without the offeror’s having any idea whether they will ever be taken up and accepted, and thereby be transformed into a contract.

Carlill v Carbonic Smoke Ball is instrumental in developing the law of unilateral offers. The case sets out the three

Now, according to Section 2(b) , "When the person to whom the proposal is made, signifies his assent there to, the proposal is said to be accepted i.e., the moment a person expresses his acceptance of the offer, the moment the contract is concluded, and a viniculum juris binds both the parties from which, they cannot get out, except by mutual consent" .In this case, B communicated his acceptance to A and hence the contract is binding on A.