Rhetoric Situation Is A Fundamental Aspect Of The Rhetorical Theory

“The Rhetorical Situation” by Lloyd Bitzer discusses what a rhetorical situation includes for a situation to be identified as a rhetorical situation. Bitzer states that a rhetorical situation occurs when an issue has the possibility of being changed in a positive way. Bitzer discusses that a rhetorical situation must include rhetorical exigence, audience, and constraints. Rhetorical exigences must be receptive of positive change and can only be changed through discourse. Bitzer explains that discourse is a type of social practice or a way of thinking.

“We spend so much time listening to the things people are saying that we rarely pay attention to the things they don’t” (Smith 2014). Silence is a language that any person on this planet can understand. It invades awkward, but critical conversations and tricks the mind into not speaking. Silence, itself, is a rhetorical situation that every encounters, whether within themselves or with a million other people because it prevents the truth from coming out. Bitzer states that the rhetorical situation is “a complex of persons, events, objects, and relations presenting an actual or potential exigence which can be completely or partially removed if discourse, introduced into the situation, can so constrain human decision or action as to bring about the significant modification of the exigence”, while bringing in the characteristics of exigence, audience, and constraint (Bitzer 1968). I understand the rhetorical situation as a problem that is spoken about by one or more persons, often with the goal to solve it; however, to discuss the problem with the right people, gives way to positively change the situation. In the

Zarefsky broke this long definition apart and repackaged it into a function statement that a rhetorical situation is a situation in which people’s understanding can be changed through messages (Zarefsky 9), and four components, namely the audience, the occasion, the speaker and the

Keith Grant-Davie's essay on rhetorical situations is an in depth explanation of rhetorical situations. A rhetorical situation is when a rhetorician or writer wants to change the way an audience see's or understands something by using discourse. Grant-Davie describes the four main parts of a rhetorical situation as being the rhetor, an audience, exigence, and constraints. The rhetor, is the speaker or producer that is trying to get an idea into the audiences head. The audience is anyone who is taking in the material that the rhetor is advertising. Exigence is the "problem" that the rhetor is addressing; the whole reason discourse was brought to light. Finally constraints are the boundaries the rhetor follows to butter up the audience. They

In reading Lloyd F. Bitzer's essay The Rhetorical Situation, my understanding is that there are several components needed to complete a rhetorical situation-- including the situation. According to Bitzer, if there isn't a situation existing that compels an exigency-- the rhetoric will be empty. I agree with Bitzer's viewpoint. He points out how "rhetoric is essentially related to a situation". Lloyd Bitzer also goes on to say that if there is no situation, there will be no response or utterance from the audience, and it is most important to invite a compelling need to have an utterance. Bitzer also implies that during a speech, the response has to fit the situation, have relevance, and only this will make the rhetoric significant. Overall,

In “Backpacks vs. Briefcases: Steps toward Rhetorical Analysis”, the author, Laura Bolin Carroll describes the essentials of rhetorical analysis and how it helps us make decisions in our everyday life. She begins by explaining how we unconsciously analyze and conclude our perception of people when we meet them. This introduces the readers to rhetorical analysis. Rhetorical analysis is articulating imagery or surroundings that persuade us on our choices. Carroll believes that this is an important aspect and that we can make better conclusions if we utilize rhetorical analysis on our day-to-day encounters. She further states that there are three parts in understanding a context of rhetoric. They are (1) Exigence: events that require actions

In Grant Davie’s “Rhetorical Situations and Their Constituents,” he stresses the importance of both the rhetoric and the audience in various situations.

No one wants to read a boring paper. It will make people tired within minutes. Most textbooks have no word or images that captivate their readers. That’s why people avoid reading them because there’s nothing fascinating about it. Writing about a topic that has conflict and visual literacy will keep the audience interested and wanting to read more about it. In a rhetorical situation, there are tones used for different types of audience. Rhetoric is used for different communities. It needs to be a reliable in a specific topic in order to communicate effectively.

To have a rhetorical analysis is to look at a literary dimensions of a passage. When using a rhetorical analysis with a biblical text your main reason of rhetorical analysis is for clarifying our understanding. In the ancient times, the authors often would employ the same techniques that today’s authors use to assist the readers to understand the message of the text or just to persuade them of the truth of the presentation. Rhetorical analysis is considered an art of reading a text it closely involves close attention to the scope of a given passage, meaning the beginning and the end. Rhetorical analysis should always have the slight possibility of the text will bear directly on exegetical questions. This device rhetorical analysis is also called

In order to effectively combat these issues, leaders must implement new courses of action that involve fundraising and awareness through the use of rhetorical sensitivity. According to Lloyd F. Bitzer, associate professor of speech at the University of Wisconsin, a rhetorical situation arises when a circumstance requires the attention of an audience. The audience must overcome obstacles to achieve a certain goal set forth by the leader utilizing rhetorical discourse (Bitzer 9).

For effective rhetoric to take shape, the rhetoric must create a situation through which they are able to persuade. According to Vatz, "No situation can have a nature...independent of rhetoric" (154). If rhetoric were not present, then there would be no situations. The situations created by

Rhetoric language is used to achieve a purpose, or to get a point across so that it is completely understood. Constitutes of the situation consists of an exigence, rhetor, audience, and constraint. While the audience and the rhetor are very important in a rhetorical situation because they are the people involved in the discourse; the more important parts of a rhetorical situation are the way either constraints or exigence are used to get your point across. These are the main strategies used to achieve your purpose. Exigence and constraints both move the discussion; they are usually the main focus in the situation.

In The Rhetorical Situation, Lloyd F. Bitzer argues that what makes a situation rhetorical is similar to that which constitutes a moral action as he writes that, “an act is moral because it is an act performed in a situation of a certain kind; similarly, a work is rhetorical because it is a response to a situation of a certain kind”.(3) By defining the rhetorical situation in this way, Bitzer further contends that rhetoric is a means to altering reality. (4) It is through the use of discourse that one is capable of changing reality through thought and action. (4) Bitzer then elaborates upon the nature of a rhetorical situation by explaining that rhetorical discourse enters a situation when: providing a response to its state of affairs;

I have been your classmate for several months and believe that you are very intelligent man. That is why I am sure that you might have used the three aspects of rhetoric approaches because they are based on skills that we all have: logic, ethic, and feelings. By using credible sources and proper grammar, you are using ethos, without doubt. However, at some point, you must have used some personal experiences or logic, which appeals to logos. If you think that you also put some heart into it, trying to make readers understand the topic from their personal point of view, that should be considered as pathos because, you are appealing to their feelings, the way they see the topic.

In the view of Lloyd Blitzer, he explains what makes situations rhetorical that is identical to a “moral act”. His definition of a moral act is when you act or preform by any situation. He shows examples of different types of rhetorical analysis that happened in the past. Blitzer states that a rhetorical analysis is a change in reality. Therefore, he is saying that it is an action or new information that is to be addressed or known. He states that rhetorical analysis should be followed by a rhetorical method. Blitzer mentioned that there are three main components when writing a rhetorical analysis. One component to look for is referred to as exigence. Exigence is the reason you are proving something. Audience is the part of a rhetorical analysis that involves people that you are trying to get to understand your situation. Lloyd stated that everyone is being capable by the change of speech. From my perspective, Blitzer’s rhetorical audience consists only of people who are more likely influenced by discourse and have the possibility of becoming mediators of change. The final component is constraint. Constraint deals with limitation and restrictions in a rhetorical analysis. Charleston Hope provides a great opportunity to become involved and assist with its mission throughout the community.