Rhetorical Analysis

Aaron Smutz, a philosophy professor at Rhode Island College, in his rhetorical essay “Are Video Games Art?” asserts that video games are indeed art. He first puts forward three critically well-received games to be considered art, then determines what can be used to determine art by considering “sister media” like art and music as well as competition such as chess, football or ice-skating. After establishing an “informal” definition of art, Smutz comes to conclude that since the games he provided cover several facets of game-types and since those games can reasonably fall into the definitions provided of art, then most video games should be considered art. Smutz forms his essay in order to explore the artistic merit of games. Smutz also writes

Have you ever thought video games can be Art? Many people might agree on this topic. An American film critic, historian, journalist, screenwriter and author Robert Ebert has a different view on this topic. He has expressed his opponent view through the article “Video Games Can Never be Art”. Even though he tries to deal on this topic by many examples, definitions and critics, he doesn’t looks like expertise, unbiased, and mature in this topic.

Grand Theft Auto 5, one of the year's bestselling titles, allows players to kill prostitutes and torture characters, which sparked fierce debate on whether game makers have a moral responsibility to their audience.” Critics claim that violence in video games creates negative behaviors in reality but yet fail to accept beneficial soothness that these virtual worlds bring to gamers. But those dangers alone shouldn't discourage people from giving games a chance any more than we should shun television because it traffics in adult themes, not when there's so much to celebrate and still so much room for improvement. Video games are profoundly cognitive in an ideal position of having an adverse effect on the production of knowledge and perseverance. Stereotypically, video games disrupt mental awareness, body fitness, and productiveness. In circumstances of neglect and emptiness of oneself’s individuality in society, video games provide genuine warmth and compatibility in a virtual state. For example, in the same article beforehand, Nicholas Lioa makes this argument, “As both games and those who play them keep branching out, the definition of gaming will continue to change. It's true that gaming's qualities have an underside. The same technology that creates experiences of empathy can also offer escape from reality… the advent of more thoughtful

Games Art? movie critic Roger Ebert has an opposing view on whether video games should be

People are entitled to their own opinions. And that’s a fact. Some think violent video games are poisoning the youth of our modern day. Although others severely disagree with this point. Two men, J. Ramirez and the other man anonymous, have stated their opinions in written articles. My adult education teacher, Mr. Michael Bittner is having us compare these articles to determine whose argument is supported by the words following their point.

While the media portrays gaming as a antisocial violent unhealthy habit for the common immature male, the reality is that the gaming industry has diversified immensely over the last half-century. As such, I will write to non-gamers everywhere to extend a welcoming hand into our community by focusing on its entertainment value and genre diversity. Following this, I will write to the artist community to invite them join, and possibly work for, the videogame industry by speaking about the copious opportunities in this billion dollar industry.

In the article written by Roger Ebert, “Video Games Can Never Be Art”, he discusses his view on why video games should not be considered art. In the beginning Ebert explains why he thinks today’s video games can not compare to modern art, furthermore they will not ever be close to poets or filmmakers work (Ebert). Ebert then brings up the Ted talk with Santiago where he states, “No one in or out of the field has ever been able to cite a game worthy of comparison with the great poets, filmmakers, novelists and poets” (Ebert). What he is trying to say here is that when gamemakers are creating video games they will never equal up to their artistic ability of these different types of artist. Then he mentions how video games are not art because

Roger Ebert made a post on his blog on April 16, 2010 after Kellee's Ted talk. “She begins by saying video games already are art. Yet she concedes that I was correct when I wrote, "No one in or out

I’m still reading a bunch and my current book, Extra Lives, is essentially critical theory on video games as literature. This divide between what makes something ‘art’ is something I’m kinda big on, so it’s a fascinating read. There’s one thing that Tom Bissell says which struck me: that because video games must be, by nature, fun, they’re seen as being less artistic or literary than other mediums.

Video games and art have a lot in common just that because many don't see videogames as art they see video games more as like entertainment. Just like you can get a scholarship for being an artist and painting a drawing. Video games can give you that opportunity also there's scholarships that they give for being very good at playing video games. Many don’t see videogames as art but why if just like an art piece it has many features that make it art. If we can get a lot of stuff from analyzing a painting that can have a lot of meaning why can't we do the same about a video games. Yes some would agree that video games are a work of art in a debate they asked the same question “can videogames be a work of art.” 78% said yes it is a work of art and 22% said no it's not. One of the person who said no said this “ Art cannot be replaced. Video games is in front of a

why should video games be considered art? video games should be considered art because what they have done in such a short amount of time by taking video games apart you'll be able to see how much art actually gets put into video games such as music; visuals and acting.these all would be considered art on there own. but because video games are a new median of entertainment most people dislike video games and ridicule them for being new.

In the article, “Are video games art? No – but playing them can be” by Phil Hartup, Phil explains his opinion on how video games aren't art, but the players are. I believe that video games are art, and the players are creating the story. In the article, the author states “The artist is not the writer of the story or the person who designs the characters”. This statement is wrong, the artist is the one who created the game and the people who are playing the game a creating the story.

In the Article “Why Video Games Are Works Of Art” Kyle Chayka states his views on Roger Ebert’s argument made in the article “Video Games can never be art.” In Eberts article he says that video games are something that can be won, and include rules and objectives, where art is a visually pleasing, and emotionally powerful experience. As a result in Ebert saying this, Chayka comes back and states many of the things he has experienced in video games. For example, he states “I’ve stood at the top of a grass-blown knoll overlooking the sea, a view that stretched to cover a land of sprawling islands traversed only by my sailboat and me. I have played a musical instrument that controls the wind. I’ve been a sword-wielding teenage adventurer, a ghostbuster,

Historically video games have been considered a novelty or technical subject, but in recent year given the increase in technology video games have been able to show that they are more. While not a traditional art form, video games do have an artistic basis. Video games are increasingly becoming more story and visually based. With these increased artistic elements it is increasingly becoming harder to deny that video games are art, but maybe they are not the art defined by a traditional definition. Critics state that that video games do not have the artistic values that art has but perhaps there needs to be a new definition of what art is to include video games.

Ask any major in the fine arts for the definition of art. They're likely to tell you that it is self-expression through the use of some sort of medium. Most commonly thought of are clay for a sculpture, paint for a masterpiece, even music notes for a four-movement suite. The last thing you'd think of is a computer program for a video game. But why not? Don't video games incorporate both artwork and music? Each one is considered art, but many people consider the result, when put together, to be a waste of time. Through personal experience, I would have to define art as not only a way to express yourself, but as a source of inspiration to others. Not only do video games use art with music, they oftentimes