Rhetorical Analysis : Greeting And Jesus 's Departing Speech Essay

Luke was a Gentile physician, an educated “skilled literary artist”, a friend of Paul’s and a follower of Jesus (Strauss, 2011, p. 6497). He did not claim to have a personal witness any of the acts he speaks of in his text but brings attention to his sources (Strauss, 2011, p. 5886.) He was qualified to write a book in the Bible because “Luke stresses the historical reliability of his story” and effectively presents supported claims which insist he has “investigated these accounts to ensure their veracity” within his book (Strauss, 2011, p. 5886, 6504). He “shows a strong interest in historiography” ultimately providing a testament to his effectiveness

Luke was the only author of the Bible who was a physician. His two books in the Bible, which are the gospel of Luke and the book of Acts, are constructed in a highly scientific way. He was not present at the time in which the gospel was written and so he had to acquire all of the data through interviewing others to be able to write a truthful account of the stories told. The book of Acts is partly a collection of observations of the events that he witnessed. Through these two methods, Luke was able to construct part of the gospel and a book of the New Testament that radically proclaimed his faith in Jesus Christ and how we should follow him. Luke new how to seek out the truth and then proclaim the truth once he found it. He lived a life that

In the first section, “The Holy Spirit in Luke-Acts: A Challenge in methodology”, Stronstad discusses the theological

This is found by comparing Acts 1:1 with Luke 1:3-4. Acts 1:1: "In my former book, Theophilus, I wrote about all that Jesus began to do and to teach until the day he was taken up to heaven, after giving instructions through the Holy Spirit to the apostles he had chosen." Luke 1: 3-4: " (3) Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, (4) so that you may know the certainty of things you have been taught." Because Luke's first book was written to Theophilus as was Acts, Luke must be the author of both.

The juxtaposition of any two writings is a formidable task. The content of each, even if they seem alike, is a small part in determining similarities and differences. One must also look at the styles, authors, themes, supposed audiences and authorial intent. This front becomes even more difficult while exegeting and deciphering ancient texts because of how far removed the writings are from modern understanding and scholarship. It is also further complicated when one lacks the factual knowledge of which piece was written first and/or if both texts were using a third source at the time of their creation. These difficulties find their apex at the study of Christian history and all of its subsequent writings. In particular, the gospels according to Thomas and Luke, while they have similarities and at times identical phraseology are vastly different when one considers their theological understandings, themes, format and style.

I believe that Luke wrote the book of Acts to allow Christians to see the early history of the Church. Also, it was the place in the bible where to Holy Spirit arrived. The Holy Spirit is first mentioned when the Lord tells His people that He will send The Holy Spirit soon. Then later after Jesus told them that He was sending the Holy Spirit to guide the disciples, the Holy Spirit came. When the Holy Spirit came the Disciples, they were able to experience God on a whole new level. It allowed them to preach the gospel with much more power because it wasn't them speaking, it was God. Luke's purpose in writing the book of Acts was to make clear of what the early church history looked like and the arrival of the Holy Spirit. It was also written

In reading Howard I. Marshall, “Acts”, Tyndale New Testament Commentaries. He implied, the most significant for studying and interpreting the book of Acts is how a reader gets out of what he is reading and how he approaches it (Marshall, 17). He states that, “an average reader studies the books of Acts as a history book of the early church” (Marshall, 17). Readers should use critical thinking to seek a deeper revelation. For example: recognizing the authorship to the Gospel of Luke. And seek for what the author’s purpose of writing Luke-Acts (Marshall, 19). Accurate information gives better understanding. In fact, if a reader did not know the culture or customs of the first-century Christian writers of the early church. They would not know the first-century Christian writers were only known to write Letters and Gospels, and not large history literature, as the author did in the book of Acts (Marshall, 18). Who was the author addressing with his literature (Marshall, 18)? With these considerations, it is most significant to have accurate information to be able to study and interpret the true of the book of Acts.

These letters had already been written when Luke wrote the Book of Acts, but a close reading indicates that they are independent of one another. Paul wrote letters to

This acts refers Theophilus. Theophilus is the name or honorary title of the person to whom the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles are addressed. It means God-loving in Greek.

The New Testament contains various groups of literature that include The Gospels, the Book of Acts, a collection of Letters, and the book of Revelation. The Gospels is a unique literary group that early Christians discovered to profess the good news related to Jesus. The good news shared the story about Jesus’ spiritual work, demise, and resurrection (Harris, 2014, p.13). The second book of Acts is known as an extension of Luke’s Gospel that represents Jesus’ supporters as they carried on his work, influenced by the exact godly spirit that is related to Jesus (Harris, 2014, p.14). Also, the books of Acts provide a theological aspect about the history of the Early Church and the aftermath of Jesus’ life and death. The third book consists of

Luke writes more about events instead of Jewish history, is the longest gospel although Matthew has more chapters. Luke was written to go along with Acts and is the most literary of the gospels. Both Luke and Acts were addressed to Theophelus. Students of the Bible have discussed who actually is this Theophelus? For the sake of time for this assignment lets just say that he was probably a Roman Officer or a high ranking official in the Roman Government. I came to this conclusion because Luke addressed Theophilus as most excellent. This title was usually applied to officials or members of the aristocracy. Luke evedently wanted his Roman friend to have complete knowledge of the truth.

In reading and analyzing both the verses, there were similarities in the language used to illustrate salvation physically and spiritually. In Luke Johnson’s Social Dimensions of Soteria, Johnson says there is a centered salvation theme in Luke, Acts, and Paul. He also states there are several references to redemption and liberation in regards to salvation, as well as using “language games” (suggestions rather than demonstrations regarding salvation). (Johnson, 20)

The authorship of the book of Luke is widely accepted to have been written by Luke. Luke was an associate of Paul, so it has been compared to the many works of Paul, and the book of Luke is held mostly in conjunction with the book of Acts. The two volume work is referred to as Luke-Acts and together they account for 27.5% of the New Testament. “This is the largest contribution to the Bible by a

The Gospel according to Luke exhibits several differences from the other Synoptic Gospels. Unlike Matthew and Mark who record Jesus saying: "My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?" Luke states "Father, into your hands, I commend my Spirit."

The Book of Acts was written to provide a history of the early church. Acts emphasis the importance of the day of Pentecost and being empowered to be effective witnesses for Jesus Christ. Acts sheds light on the ministry gift of the Holy Spirit, which empowers, guides, teaches, and serves as our Counselor. When reading the Book of Acts many of the readers will be enlightened and encouraged by the many miracles that were being performed during this time by the disciples Peter, John, and Paul. The Book of Acts emphasizes the importance of obedience to God’s Word and the transformation that occurs as a result of knowing Christ. There are also many references to those that rejected the truth that the disciples preached about in Jesus Christ.