Rhetorical Analysis Ideas

For years there has been public controversies over the advancements in science and all of the health risks that have been around, but now the use of the media has certainly boosted the amount of confusion throughout the public. Frightening stories regarding the progressions of science have been appearing online and in print. One particular example of this issue was the MMR vaccine debate. The MMR vaccine is an immunization vaccine which fights against rubella, measles, and mumps. During the 1990’s the media played a huge role in the decisions parents made regarding whether or not they allowed their children to get vaccinated. The media portrayed the MMR vaccine as having a possible link between autism. Which left the public worried about the MMR vaccine and having conflicting views and feelings towards the safety of vaccinations. In the MMR vaccine debate scientist and the media played two different roles which helped citizens make decisions regarding vaccination.

In their article, Students Step up to Lead Tech Implementation at Their Elementary School, Taryn Handlon and Tiffany Costa write about how TechXpert all started with an idea for prominent engagement. The Roosevelt Elementary School in Park Ridge, Illinois, had begun implementing new tools such as Chromebooks, Spheros, Dash and Dots, Cubelets, Snap Circuits, Osmos, Marble Mazes and a 3D printer to the classrooms, which highlighted the schools desire to collaborate technology with learning. This would not only transform the whole classroom environment, but also open the door for young students to explore computer science and technical engineering. The only issue seemed to be that teachers had no time to educate themselves on the tools and how

Writers and speakers appeal to logos for logic and reason. Logos is very rational with a clear, main idea

A good presenter is someone who ensures the information being presented is interesting, is not made up or fake, not a speech or written essay being read off paper. As someone who is performing a presentation, you should always ask these questions to ensure the audience is getting the best possible experience. 1.How does/is your audience (going to) feel about the subject being presented? What would they want to hear me talk about? 2.Is my delivery being executed in such a way the audience gets the clear message in the tone desired? Ensure you're getting the message across and getting across the way you want. 3.What is the objective of my speech? What is my speech trying to accomplish? What is the motive? 4.How would I feel if I were the audience?

1.) Basically, Gladwell leads the reader back and forth through time, and through the history of cancer research. It begins with trials and failures of commonly used drugs and treatments, all with limited to no success. Then new, un-thought of experimental, multi pronged treatments, which attacked cancers on multiple fronts, were developed. At first too powerful, then reduced, tweaked and perfected, these new multi-pronged treatments became a cancer fighting force to be reckoned with. Demolishing childhood leukemia in its first few bouts. Then a cellular biologist who figured that mass screen testing was not utilized massively enough, decided he was going to collect man-made compounds

Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm”. A question remaining posed after his death why the name of this brilliant researcher and his life’s work had nearly been deleted from the internet. Is his discoveries inconvenient for large firms, or undermine large firms business?

According to the American Cancer Society, there have been an estimated 595,690 cancer related deaths in the United States 2016. Researchers are continuously trying to combat this issue by developing new therapies to treat cancer. Immunotherapy is a type of therapy that has been around for decades, but has recently been making medical breakthroughs, helping cancer patients reach remission for years. Immunotherapy is a generalized term that describes a variety of techniques used to fight cancer, all of which stimulate the immune system to attack diseases. It has been around for decades; however, recent discoveries are causing quite the rave from cancer patients seeking remission. With that being said, the complex process is still leaving researchers with more questions than answers. The government’s “cancer moonshot” program, pharmaceutical companies, and philanthropists are funneling billions of dollars into developing immunotherapeutic treatments for cancer patients (Grady). Not only do the researchers establishing treatments have to understand cancer and how it works, but they also have to continuously stay informed about new breakthroughs. There is a variety of different techniques under the category of immunotherapy and each has been tested on cancer patients. Some of those patients successfully went into remission, while others, usually the majority of people participating in the study, suffered from life threatening side

Bissell begins by giving us a short preliminary in developmental biology stating that we all started from a single cell and developed into 10-70 trillion of cells within the same genetic information. Her hypothesis of cancer was that it was a solitary oncogene (a gene that is transformed in a specific way) in a single cell is adequate to cause cancer. That didn’t make sense to her because if that was accurate, each harmful cell in our bodies would turn into a tumor and we’ll all be one major piece of malignancy. This clarifies why many individuals harbor conceivably threatening tumors in their bodies without knowing it and never evolve malignancy, and why tumors are frequently created when tissue is mutilated or when the immune system is subdued.

Nonetheless, an analysis conducted by Bailar and Gornik evaluated the overall progress against cancer from 1970 through 1994 by examining mortality rates [2]. The analysis concluded that the effect of new treatments for cancer has not shown any major sign of improvement, regardless of 40 years of research [2]. While this conclusion remains less supportive of the hypothesis, the fact that after a substantial amount of research majority of deaths in the United States are still due to cancer, certainly adds some validity to Bailar and Gornik’s

The intended audience of this source is adults. They are targeting adults that would watch the Super Bowl and the Puppy Bowl. They also target adults with enough education, work experience, and perspective to appreciate or engage in an article that offers a meta-view or macrocosmic view of trends in media consumption. The adults are likely in and over their thirties, with moderate to exceptional knowledge of their indigenous culture (American), including the traditional & popular cultural practices. It is uncertain as to whether there is a specific ethnicity targeted, as the content is regarding puppies and other cute baby animals, which appeal to people of all ethnicities. The content has a universal appeal; the writing style of the article appeals to middle class white Americans, or those who relate most to that culture or at least have a moderate understanding to that culture. The assumptions the article makes regarding the audience is that they watched one or both bowls and that they have a neutral or friendly audience. They assume an audience that is moderately informed as well as moderately uninformed; this article is for those who know about the Puppy Bowl and for those who do not. The article does not definitely identify the type of audience they want. The information regarding the audience is implied and contextual.

In the traditional school system, students prove they “know something” by taking a test. A mathematician proves knowledge in their field by corroborating repeatable accuracy on a given equation. The scientific community has its own specified basis for knowledge. “In the twentieth century, to discover the hidden causes of unpredictable and unknown responses to treatment, medical researchers, with the aid of statisticians, have developed a mathematical model to describe and calibrate the complex responses of the human body to therapeutic intervention.” (Marcia L. Meldrum Ph.D) This was known as the earliest form of an RCT (Randomized Controlled Trial). This analysis provided the most effective form of testing by using information derived from past studies on vaccines, using double blind procedures, and using the most accurate software to record and calculate results.

Over the past decade, before pursuing a particular line of research, scientists (including C.G.B.) in the haematology and oncology department at the biotechnology firm Amgen in Thousand Oaks, California, tried to confirm published findings related to that work. Fifty-three papers were deemed 'landmark' studies (see 'Reproducibility of research findings'). It was acknowledged from the outset that some of the data might not hold up, because papers were deliberately selected that described something completely new, such as fresh

As indicated by research, talk is the investigation of how authors and speakers utilize words to impact a group of people. Be that as it may, the critical research is an article that breaks a work of true to life into parts and in this manner, utilizes them to disclose how they team up to make a particular impact which is intended to convince, engage or rather educate the given group of onlookers. However, you should to always save in perception that scholars of various orders and they regularly utilize different written work procedures which are to help them accomplish their objectives. In this way, it is all altogether different how we ought to investigate a relevant article contrasted with a humanities author. What's

It’s not uncommon for a news audience to run across stories or headlines about science that seem too good to be true. Headlines such as, “Scientist Say Smelling Farts Might Prevent Cancer,” (Stampler, 2014) or “Bananas as good as drugs for treating HIV, say scientists.” (Arkless Gray, 2010) Not only are these headlines flashy enough to get the attention of a wide audience, but they go beyond distributing the facts to wade into the waters of Yellow Journalism. In fact, much of the news distributed today might be considered such milky fare even by passive audience members.

At a time when we are enjoying longer, more healthful lives, ominous headlines announce: ‘Researchers Tie Aluminium to Alzheimers Disease’ and ‘ Coffee Linked to Cholesterol rise’ As a result of alarming and sometimes ambiguous bulletins, minor health worries often become major medical threats, and speculations about disease prevention become ‘proven’ cure. Part of the problem is that media often trumpet questionable research findings as major medical break throughs. In 1985, three French scientists told reporters at a press conference that the drug cyclosporine appeared to halt the growth of the AIDS virus. They based the