Rhetorical Analysis Of An Immigrant

As I previously aforementioned, both authors’ had the same view. Both of the authors, Quindlen and Kennedy, view our country as having been built of immigrants;

The United States of America is a country with a growing population. The population has always been growing, ever since the welcoming of new comers to the United States. Some people see these immigrants as beneficial to the American people and some see them as a threat to the Americans. Respectively, give good reasons, and some do not.To begin, I will present to you two written pieces. The first one will be by former president Bill Clinton, in how immigration benefits America. This writing piece begins with an introduction to the issue, diversity and immigration. Clinton addresses the American people by claiming, “If both citizens and immigrants do their part[s], [America] will grow even stronger in the new global information economy”. Clinton then gives some major reasons to his claim. The first one is in how the cooperation of citizens is necessary in order to be united with the immigrants and be strong. The second point Clinton wants to show how immigrants are good for America, by suggesting that they energize the American culture and renewing American values. Clinton then gives evidence in how this is true by introducing the Gibson family and counter augmenting the fact that immigrants take more than they give. Clinton then comes to another point by suggesting that union is only possible if the American citizens share the nation. Clinton then continues to show what some responsibilities of the American citizens are by reminding them of the Declaration of independence

Both Clinton and Auster provided several facts to back up their claims. Clintons essay is convincing and relevant, and he encourages both immigrants and Americans to live in harmony with one another. Clinton assured immigrants and

In their commentary, “Immigration, America’s Advantage”, Lee Habeeb and Mike Leven make several interesting statements. They spend the first part of

The information in Jordan’s article is well organized and laid out. As well as the issue are being addressed. Firstly, Jordan started the article with an overview of the issue on veteran immigrants. The overviews included information on the issue. Jordan’s article has usable information because it allows the audience to retrieve the information on immigrants. The design and page layout of the article is neat and tidy. The language and vocabulary Jordan used is easy to understand. The information is accessible because I can understand it and also because of its accuracy. The article does not contain any ambiguous information. It maintains a purpose and that is to provide me with information. Jordan article is a good example of usability. All of the information were consistent, it provides a good feedback of how the immigrant veterans felt, and the article is clear and a lot of residents are able to relate to it. The article was clear and concise. There were also a lot of information on immigrant veterans and deportation if a minor crime was committed. Overall, I believe that this article is a good example of technical

This paper looks at the rhetorical style of three articles regarding immigration. The article have various viewpoints and each looks at different aspects of the immigration. The articles all have in depth analysis on the topic they are covering. I will look at each article by analyzing the way the article is presented. I will try not worry about the topic, but the style of the writing and tone. Each article has characteristics of audience and rhetoric which gives them a sense of credibility.

The author claims that immigrants are not burdens, but in fact are beneficial to society, and I have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand, being a son to two Mexican immigrant parents, I agree that immigrants are highly productive and help the economy. On the other hand, I still

Immigration is a timely issue that took my interest, and being an immigrant it was the first topic that came to my mind for this problem-solution research paper. It is imperative that the citizens must know that there are underlying major problems that are associated with the current immigration policy of the country. Thus, the United States’ government must address this serious problem with the majority support of its citizens. By tackling the issue of immigration, it will not just resolve one problem, but the elemental aspects that go along with it as well. The main objective of this argument paper is to increase awareness by presenting the opposing arguments concerning immigration. Also, to help enlighten the minds of the people, and

In terms of the presentation, the author’s tone is very pessimistic, negative and extreme. It could be seen that the author is very opposed to the immigration to America. He also fears the immigration will destroy American culture. He even uses some words, which could obviously express his emotions, such as negative, threat, fear, defenseless, tragic error, abandon the temporary idea. (Auster, 2002) The overall essay gives reader a sense of skepticism and. Though the claim of the essay is very extreme, and the evidence is not very supportive, the overall text is relatively well organized, because it has a clear

Edward Alden explains in his article the positives and the negatives of our current way of dealing with immigration and control. He gives a brief summary of the happening at the beginning of his paper and then expounds on each as he continues his article. Alden also present a well-organized abstract that gave a good overall view of the whole article as well as showing the purpose for which he is writing. The author presented each topic clearly and concisely.

Questions for Rhetorical Analysis 1. What historical occasion gives rise to the need for investigation and the creation of this text? Gender Bias is being taught and occurs unintentionally in our schools. Teachers challenge boys more than girls. Sexism is so elusive, it is being taught every day and educators are not even aware they are doing it.

Only a month has passed since the presidential inauguration, and the new administration has stirred up much controversy in regards to the executive orders signed by Donald Trump in his first few weeks of presidency, Though several weeks have passed, the infamous refugee ban and the border wall initiative are continuing to shake U.S. politics, and the media has covered the many different parts of what is on the minds of these Americans. A couple of common themes found throughout these selected articles is the growing concern for the U.S. economy and international relations with foreign countries in regards to the aforementioned hot topics of this month. Additionally, how human rights may be violated in the pursuit of the undocumented people

He had informed my husband Rene Milian Lopez and I Magdalena Hernandez Cabrera, that he is in the process of suing his landlord for wanting to kick him out of his house due to his age and the amount of years he’s lived in that property. My husband and I both concede that that is preposterous. Nobody has the right to remove a person out of their home, even if they’re the landlord without a cohesive reason. The seven years, our family has lived across the street from... house, we have observed his calm, conscientious, and welcoming persona. Throughout the years we’ve never noticed any complaints from his neighbors, arguing/fights, and bad neighborly conduct. We can both agree that this

The speech was about illegal immigration over the past few years of within United States. The rising number of illegal immigration has been one of the most pushing issues affecting U.S. legislators. The illegal immigrant comes to U.S. for various reasons. The lecturer said some people left their original nation to seek for a better lifestyle and others may say for religious reasons or just to get away while other people come for more possibilities or better education. The lecturer then asked us “Do you support the law stating that illegal immigrant must be sent back to their original country? Should we have sympathy for illegal immigration actions?” On my own perspective, I think the law should have more tolerance on the illegal immigrants.

“Immigration is an agent of change, as it disturbed the status quos and existing demographic in these 3 communities. This is not to say that immigration itself is inherently provocative, but simply that it initiates change to a community.” By ("Nations Borders”) In different areas, immigration becomes a huge issue. The community can become really crowded and over time, the population increases by high amounts. People around the community can soon become bothered by all these immigrants and try to take action in to their own hands. For example, the immigrant’s neighbors and co-workers will try to deport them or take advantage of them. “Although economic and demographic realities may support opening doors for immigration, such arguments mean little to voters who feel they are losing out. One poll found that more than 15 percent of Americans say they know someone who has lost a job to an immigrant, or say they have suffered such a loss. Such citizens wonder, “Why should I pay the cost of immigration? What about me?” according to the (“Why Does”). When more immigrants immigrate to our communities, they begin to annoy people. They could make a negative impact on jobs throughout the country.