Rhetorical Analysis Of Dr. Trump

The most recent presidential election has been one of the most dividing in the history of America. While President Trump won the electoral vote, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, creating a divide in workplaces, schools, and many other public places. The greatest challenges that the President will need to address first are the unity of Americans for the acceptance of all people and the education of young people, as they are the future of our nation.

This essay is about how connotation, rhetoric, bias effect an article. The article that I chose for this essay is the LA Times article, “Trump and FDR: Meet the new fears, same as the old fears,” by Ali Swenson. The articles two main points are that Franklin D. Roosevelt and Donald Trump appeal to what people want to do about current issues; and that eople are going against Muslims now the same way that people went against the Japanese in WWII.

There are even more people engrossed in Trump's campaign as his contentious rhetoric is spreading and becoming exponentially obscene. His words foreshadow what he'd do if he were president. My teachers have said that they "don't care" if Trump becomes president because "he wouldn't have any power, thanks to Congress." Obviously, that's false, and as we all have seen, his divisive words have been significantly detrimental to unification in this country - and he's not even in charge. I can imagine how he'd undermine the liberties granted by this country from the start. As he gains more advocates for becoming President of the U.S.A, I'm sure everyone else will be even more surprised by what he has to say because he'll have more leeway for his

Republican presidential candidate John Kasich made his pitch to prospective voters in two boroughs of New York City -- Bronx and Brooklyn on Thursday that the “strongest days are ahead” in his long-shot campaign against his GOP rivals Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.

In November 2016, Donald Trump was elected president of the United States. With a campaign centered around otherization and nationalism, the atmosphere of this election, as well as the attitudes of the citizens of the country, bears similarities to 1930s Nazi Germany. While it may initially seem far-fetched to compare Donald Trump 's election to Adolf Hitler 's rise to power, both campaigns utilize nationalistic, racist sentiment and a fear of the "foreign other" to gain power within the country. Moreover, both campaigns utilize propaganda and the media in their own way to generate hatred and fear to further their own goals. I will argue that these tactics used by Donald Trump has inspired numerous acts of hatred, and that any person who is not a white male has a reason to fear Trump 's presidency.

Anderson judge’s president Trumps comments like he was wrong. He played several video clips and then after he stated reason why he thought Donald trump was wrong. Hannity on the other hand said the he thinks what happen was wrong but he did not seem like he was disagreeing with Trump so much he just basically blamed the press. He said that what Trump said was good enough for him but never good enough for the media. Andersons argument was based off of logos because he was not doing anything but stating straight facts, but I believe Hannitys argument was based off of pathos because of how he felt he basically expected everybody to feel the same way. I find Andersons side more persuasive even though he was not trying to be persuasive, I feel

Inauguration day marks a new beginning. Every four years, Americans officially welcome a new president. Each president has to address the plans, goals and ideas for the future. Therefore, the inaugural speech is meant to be an emotional and hopeful ceremony for all Americans. The inaugural speech sets the tone for the president’s first weeks in the white house. Ideally this speech will encourage those who voted to believe and trust that the right leader is in the office. On January 20, 2017 Donald Trump gave his inaugural speech and through the use of hyperboles, repetitions, and metaphors he aimed to unify the nation and give hope for the future.

Every four years’ citizens above the age of 18 get a chance to be a part of one of the single most important rights of being an American. And this right must be determined by two standing candidates in this year’s presidential election. These two candidates have had their up’s and down’s but no matter what we think as an American voter we must choose at least one. To understand each candidate there must be a critique of their trustworthiness, logic, and emotional appeals.

Donald Trump, a once controversial political candidate, gave his 2017 Inaugural address on January 20th, 2017 when he was inaugurated as the 45th president of the United States. Through appeals such as syntax and diction, religion and patriotism, and logic, Donald Trump was able to generate a unifying speech toward his audience. Amidst the growing violence and repercussions of the 2016 election, Donald Trump, in his 2017 Inaugural address, sends the message that he will put America and its citizens first to unite the country and change America for the better.

President Donald Trump announced a very important policy that he wanted to an enact… through the popular social media site called Twitter. A summarization of what his tweet means is as follows; Transgenders are a disruption in the victory of the military. This message provoked outrage and very little approval nationwide. The motivation for this tweet is beyond what many people can understand. The exigence of this tweet was very hard to formulate, but possible. Socially speaking, Trump wanted to express to society that transgenders are a disruption. He believes that transgenders being removed from the military is, in some way, crucial to the military’s victory. He uses the information that transgenders are taking up a majority of medical costs

The presidential inauguration speech started off with the new president swearing in, and taking his oath, then he made his way to the podium where he began his inauguration speech as the 45th president of the United States of America. In his speech, he went over his plans and goals for his future term: through him people will regain their political power. He uses pathos, ethos, and logos to persuade his audience of this.

I find it very hard to analyse the results of this election in an objective manner, especially speculating in consequences of a Trump presidency is something I find overwhelming.

Two thousand and seventeen, President of the United States, Donald Trump spoke to the UN in a short speech. Donald Trump used many different tactics to try to seem genuine in hopes that members of the UN trust his decisions. Many other nations were there and heard his formal speech and tried to understand how he handles issues like Iran and North Korea.

The inauguration speech of Donald Trump has characterized how he presents himself during his presidency term and to the people as well. Trump’s purpose is to bring fellow Americans to become great again by what he will do during his four years. He adopts a hopeful tone in order for Americans united together to fixing our emerging problems.As in his speech that has formal diction,hopeful and motivational tone,and simple and detailed syntax that advance his rhetorical strategies in his address.

Obama reveals that he has ancestral African blood joined with the blood of a woman of French descent within him. He has married a woman who has both slave and slave owner unbroken within her. Moreover, he has procreated children who have the blood of humanity: African, European, slave, and the Caucasian slave owner within them. Thus, he has moral authority on race because it makes the biological connection with the past and the future of humanity. When Barack Obama describes the various ways that racism is exhibited within our society, he makes an approach to the representations of race and racial conflicts within our community.