preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of Is Junk Food Really Cheaper

Decent Essays

Mark Bittman falls short on solid proof!
Rhetorical analysis on “Is Junk Food Really Cheaper?”

Why do (overweight and poor) Americans choose (expensive) junk food over real food?
Well,it seems that one man named Mark Bittman may have all the answers to this question. However, upon further scrutiny, his rock-hard evidence falls short of the mark!
In the beginning of his article called “Is Junk Food Really Cheaper?” author Mark Bittman does a spectacular job capturing the reader almost instantly just within the first paragraph. He brazenly begins his argument to express his thoughts indirectly, but directly of why the “overweight” and “low income” population cannot afford, access, or choose healthy food options. His argument starts by boldly claiming that it’s a fact that junk food is not cheaper. “
THE “fact” that junk food is cheaper than real food …show more content…

First, he claims that to fix these problems there needs to be “Real cultural changes”. His approach to creating a culture context written article falls short due to the structure and wording of his sentences. To begin, using the word “culture” is quite shocking and jarring to a reader when it is used in a sentence, and it also suggest that a person needs to change who they are from deep perspective. Bittmann makes no qualms about believing that people need to modify their culture by unashamedly questioning the readers by asking readers “HOW do you change a culture?” To have the reader overlook his question and smooth things out, he follows the question with a random belief of an unknown doctor who states that “Once I look at what I’m eating,” says Dr. Kessler, “and realize it’s not food, and I ask ‘what am I doing here?’ that’s the start. It’s not about whether I think it’s good for me, it’s about changing how I feel. And we change how people feel by changing the

Get Access