Jimmy Carter expresses his opinion about the Arctic Wildlife Refuge and how it should be conserved very strongly. He wisely mentions how if used for industry, many wild animals and their babies would end up homeless. Jimmy Carter also mentions that the local indigenous people would be stranded without their resources that they depended on for thousands of years. He claims that short-term economic gain is not worth America losing a symbol of its national heritage. Jimmy Carter expresses his discontent with the destruction of “America’s last truly great wilderness” by mentioning the most important factor that will be affected, the wildlife. He tries to pull his audience’s heartstrings by mentioning his own personal experience with his wife,Rosalynn,
In Jimmy Carter’s foreword to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge he builds an argument by using ethos, pathos and logos to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his essay. He uses ethos to appeal to ethics and convince the audience of the essay to keep the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge untouched. Carter also uses pathos to appeal to emotion and make other people want to keep it untouched. Finally, Carter uses logos to persuade his audience by using logic to feel the same way he does.
1) “He’s not going to win. It’s a Republican district. He’d be better for us if he loses. He’ll work for me. He’ll bring his organization with him.”
Jimmy Carter uses many techniques to persuade the reader that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. He uses specific word choices to catch the reader's attention. He uses evidence to show how his his argument is valid. Carter also uses emotional attachment to get the reader to become attached to this article.
For the pragmatic, the thoughts of imminent nuclear warfare terrified any rational being, whether Soviet or American. Reagan had to find a way to reason his way with not visions of hope, but with answers. He began by starting off with homeland affairs, discussing issues such as infanticide and abortions, stating statistics. For instance, he spoke against abortions claiming that they took the lives of “one and a half million”, adding on that his legislation will end such a practice. (“American Rhetoric: Ronald Reagan”) Outside of abortion, Reagan also champions the fact that he himself benefits the country by protecting handicapped and
The reason President Jimmy Carter signed off this document was to help conserve the glaciers and wildlife populations in Alaska. The park is mainly important for its spectacular and endangered glaciers along with wildlife.
To begin explaining his viewpoint, Carter relates to his audience an account of when he and his wife traveled to the Arctic. What they saw was nothing short of breathtaking. The indigenous flora and fauna inspired awe with their brilliancy. The Carters witnessed the spectacle of a myriad of caribou migrating along with their newborns. He described this experience as "unforgettable and humbling" (Carter 3). This rendition invokes a majestic view of the wildlife in the Arctic Refuge. Carter makes use of this to move his audience to adopt the perspective that the unaffected region is precious.
In his Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey, Jimmy Carter effectively convinces his audience that the wilderness of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industrial purposes. He first appeals to his readers' emotions through a detailed account of his personal experience in the Arctic Refuge. He goes on to refute those pushing for the development of the Arctic Refuge by providing an easy solution to their reason. Finally, he calls his readers to action by saying that we should keep one of America's last great wildernesses intact.
Throughout his text, US President Jimmy Carter applies many types of literary devices, and persuasive elements to help strengthen his point view as well as appeal to his audience. He also displays his logical appeal in order to strengthen his argument. This is shown through his personal anecdotes, facts, as well as the personification of the nature and his choice of whimsical diction.
"ARTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE PART OF THE SOLUTION. " US Fed News Service, Including US State News [Washington, D.C.] 30 May 2006, Research Library. ProQuest. 15 Nov. 2007 <
Jimmy Carter uses imagery throughout his argumentative article to persuade his readers. The author uses imagery because he knows if he paint a good enough picture in his readers’ heads of this beautiful place, the readers are more likely to agree with him that this Arctic Refuge should not be used for industrial purposes because it will be destroyed. For example, “This magnificent area is as vast as it is wild.” Jimmy Carter uses words like “magnificent” and “vast” because he knows that those word are used to describe beautiful places like the Arctic Refuge. Which is how the author use imagery to efficiently persuade his readers to reserve the Arctic Refuge.
Theodore Roosevelt believed that wildlife conservation and preserving our lands was of the upmost importance. The article on sageamericanhistory.net states that Theodore Roosevelt stated, “As a nation we not only enjoy a wonderful measure of present prosperity but if this prosperity is used aright it is an earnest of future success such as no other nation will have. The reward of foresight for this nation is great and easily foretold. But there must be the look ahead, there must be a realization of the fact that to waste, to destroy, our natural resources, to skin and exhaust the land instead of using it so as to increase its usefulness, will result in undermining until the days of our children the very prosperity which we ought by right to hand down to them amplified and developed. For the last few years, through several agencies, the government has been endeavoring to get our people to look ahead and to substitute a planned and orderly development of our resources in place of a
Jimmy Carter is a well known Democratic president who served between 1977 to 1981 who strongly opposed opening the Arctic Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling. His writing on the preservation of the refuge came after his term as president while new proposals were being put forward for drilling. Carter’s argument is very effective at encouraging the National Arctic Wildlife Refuge to be protected. Carter effectively uses logos, ethos, and pathos to construct a strong argument for the refuge to be preserved.
Even if the lands are protected, they are not safe from the ecological burden of protecting our borders. Due to changes in legislation the Border Patrol Agency is exempt from stringent environmental laws. This is true in any of the areas surrounding the border, and they are looking to expand the radius of exemption, to better protect our borders. The Defenders of Wildlife, the Sierra Club, and the Northern Jaguar Project are looking to reinstall a social rule which the United States already implemented with the Endangered Species Act. This legislation created the social rule that no species should be forced into extinction due to human activities. Riders on the Illegal Immigration Act and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 and the Real ID act of 2005 allowed this social rule to become obsolete. Social rules changes in favor of the environment occur when the public is largely in support for saving the environment. However this support can be splintered by another need of the country especially when the opposing discourse has a crisis wave to ride. This case shows how the issue of border security triumphs environmental needs due to the pertinence of immigration reform along with the crisis impact caused by the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.
“American seemed to think nothing of remarking nature for the sake of progress”, Alexis de Tocqueville, a French diplomat commented when he was visiting the United States in 1831. While the American people were overwhelmed by pride and pleasure from their achievement in making industrial and economic progress, the environment was harmed in an alarming speed. Landscape was transformed, and forests were destroyed due to industrialization. By 1990, only a fraction of the United States Virgin forests were still standing. Farmers cleared trees to plant crops, and loggers cut down large areas of woodland for business profits. More than that, the most horrific thing was the government was willing to encourage loggers to exploit the forests resources by selling them large plots of land in the North West. In other words, the government was inviting loggers to destroy the landscape. Besides the loss of forests, the increasing number of ranching boosted the erosion of landscape. Crops were
America Should Reject the Oil Businesses Plan and Permanently Protect The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge