preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Great Influenza

Good Essays

The Great Influenza Rhetorical Analysis Essay Attention Getting Device: John Barry, in his writing, The Great Influenza, he states, “To be a scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage. It is not the courage to venture into the unknown. It is the courage to accept — indeed, embrace — uncertainty” (Barry 2). During all eras of time, scientists have endured enormous amounts of adversity. Scientists have had to maintain a wide variety of skills in several different areas to assist them in different circumstances that they endure. Scientists must have persistence, due to their main activity being trial and error. This means that once they have failed, they most certainly have to be willing to try it again. A scientist also must posses acceptance, as there will be times when they receive results that are not their predictions. Scientist must obtain acceptance to come to terms with the results found in their laboratory. In John Barry’s The Great Influenza, he utilizes metonymy and rhetorical questioning to characterize scientific research. Topic sentence: John Barry uses metonymies to relate a scientist’s work to an easier understood scenario. In the middle of his writing, Barry states, “A shovel can dig up dirt but cannot penetrate rock. Would a pick be best, or would dynamite be better — or would dynamite be too indiscriminately destructive? If the rock is impenetrable, if dynamite would destroy what one is looking for, is there another way of getting information about what the rock holds?” (Barry 5). This statement is able to display the use of metonymy in several ways. This can be seen as the statement is comparing a shovel, pick, and dynamite to different tactics that a scientist would use. Also, the statement is comparing a rock to an item or element that possibly holds the information the scientist is seeking. Barry uses the substitution of these words to help the reader gain a better understanding on the work of a scientist. Barry mentions words such as “shovel”, “pick”, and “dynamite” to describe the several various methods that a scientist must consider when taking action (Barry 5). Thus showing, the difficulty

Get Access