Rhetorical Analysis Of Who Owns Global English By Dennis Baron

Music. Long ago, it was nothing but a symphony of Neanderthals banging random objects together and no one knows exactly where it originated from or who created it. However, what we do know is that we have so much to thank them for. Of course, music has heavily evolved from cavemen beating rocks together loudly and out of tune. In fact, music has become a major piece within the vast foundation of America’s culture. Looking back during the time of swing music, classic rock, 70s pop, smooth jazz, even with today’s odd mixes and mashups of songs, there’s really not one person that doesn’t like

Robert MacNeil, a writer of many great historical articles, was once, a journalist and news anchor. In his article, “English Belongs to Everybody”, MacNeil responds to the fear of many Americans who believe that Spanish will soon sweep over English. He argues that English can not be diluted by any other language as “it has prospered and grown because it was able to accept and absorb changes,”

“Others among you, perhaps fewer in number, will say to yourselves: quite so, there is such a thing as Standard English, or purity of speech, or correctness of expression- something worth safeguarding and fostering; but how the devil is one to accomplish that under the prevailing conditions: in a democratic society full of minorities that have their own dialects or linguistic preferences, and in a world in which television, advertising, and other mass media manage daily to corrupt the language

In his novel, “Brave New World,” Aldous Huxley portrays a society in which the government has full control. At the time of the books writing America was striving for this status quo of complacent pleasantry, censorship was an issue, and things that were extreme or painful were being removed. As man has progressed through the years, societies have tried to arrive at a utopian society, where everyone is happy, disease is nonexistent, and strife, anger, or sadness are unheard of. Only happiness exists. But after reading Aldous Huxley's “Brave New World,” one comes to realize that this is not, in fact, what the human being really longs for. Huxley’s intended audience seems to be people that have the vision of a perfect society. He wrote the book as a dark satire. It's meant to mock (in a serious manner) the concept of a perfect society being possible. Huxley successfully made the point that there is more to life than stability and complacent happiness by utilizing a number of rhetorical strategies.

Lyndon Johnson was persuaded that liberal patriotism and the force of the government could change society. His confidence developed out of his energetic encounters with destitution levels in Texas, his political apprenticeship amid the New Deal, and his longing to go even further than Roosevelt’s legacy. When he became president in November 1963, after John F. Kennedy’s demise, Johnson acquired the early initiatives to deal with destitution that the Kennedy organization had been considering for some time now. With high energy and extensiveness, Johnson announced a war on poverty in 64 and pressed enactment through Congress to build up the Office of Economic Opportunity. In his speech, LBJ traces his vision and objectives for “The Great Society”,

Homonationalism is a dominant discourse constituted by Professor Jasbir Puar, which refers to the integration of homosexual identities into the fold of the nation-state. It refers to the assimilation and normalization of the LGBTQ community to regulate the mainstream people. In other words, homonationalism operates in the Canadian context to normalize the racialized queer communities, through rights-based discourses, i.e. the right to citizenship through marriage, military and public service positions etc. Over the past few years, gay and lesbian individuals and queer communities have been discursively produced, and evolved as a result of dominant understandings. These understandings intersect between race, gender, sexuality, and queerness

“The ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.” John F. Kennedy

In the satire Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, the author uses rhyme to reveals that one should not become engulfed in the present and scorn the past and future, because becoming blind to the past affects the future and present. Lenina repeats rhyming phrases to convince Bernard to use soma and forget his worries of the future: “’Was and will make me ill’ she quoted, ‘I take a gramme and only am’” (Huxley 104). However Lenina does not become a character worthy of emulation or sympathy which alienates her from any influences to readers or connections made should Huxley have intended it. The genre of the book implies that most of the evidence directly stated contradicts the author’s message which urges actions opposite of the depicted. The rhyming

Freedom does not mean free. The saying has been established in the past, present, and the future which happens to be the setting of where Brave New World by Aldoux Huxley takes place. In futuristic London, though people living there come off as happy with all their wants satisfied and fulfilled, by looking closer into what seems to be a perfectly utopian society, a dystopian society strongly seems visible due to total authority and corrupt government control as further developed by perspective. Huxley's choice of point of view as the rhetorical device contributes to the dystopian purpose for the novel.

In “Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley he creates a society that artificially fertilizes ovaries to create offspring. They then condition these offspring in different ways depending what caste they are going to go into. This story has three mottos: community, identity, and stability.

Hip­ Hop is neither a commercial or political development. Hip­ Hop is actually an “Organic

In, “The American Scholar,” Ralph Waldo Emerson talk about his displeasure about how societal curriculum replicated person after another, in order to clarify that there are more efficient way to become a successful scholar. In this essay, Emerson has made distinctions between the 'old world thinking' of Europe and America. Emerson also thinks the American way should be new and different from old word thinking. Along with this main point, Emerson believes an American Scholar should be "Man Thinking,” which means being more independent, and students should get knowledge by their first hand experience through things such as nature, action, and books. In the speech at Harvard University, Emerson’s audience were a group of students from Harvard

“English is now a global lingua franca. English is an

There are nearly 7000 languages spoken in the world. Among them is the English language. Richard Lederer, a retired high school teacher chose this language to be the subject of his essay “English is a Crazy Language.” In the essay, Lederer describes English with respects to who uses it, when it is used and how it is used. They justify his claim that English is the most widely spoken language in the world.

Globalization has also contributed to an increasing interest in English-language education worldwide. In response to the emergence of English as a world-linking, global language, an increasing number of schools have stepped up English–language requirements, even at undergraduate levels. The argument is that a universal teaching language is necessary as a natural consequence of globalization.