Rhetorical Analysis Of Why Read Shakespeare By Michael Mack

Michael Mack presented an effective argument to a class of college freshmen by using rhetorical devices and counterclaims. These techniques helped to further develop Mack’s arguments. While there are aspects of his speech that could use revision, Mack’s speech was overall successful in displaying why students should read Shakespeare.

Pursuing further why Shakespeare should not be taught in school is because Shakespeare is very difficult to understand. “Shakespeare's way with words can be tough for students to grasp”.(DeBlasis) Shakespeare is a lot to comprehend because the way Shakespeare speaks is very different from today's text”.(DeBasis) Shakespeare is very tough to understand now days

Get a shovel. Get an axe. It is time to dig. William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet has many quotes with buried treasure. The riches in the literature is in the meaning of the dialogue and how it is portrayed. It is the knowledge the reader gains from examining it. The line, “Good night, good night! Parting is such sweet sorrow. That I shall say good night till it be morrow” has an undercover meaning and is exposed by rhetorical devices.

This passage can be divided into three distinct sections. The first section is where he uses rhetorical strategies to get his point across. The second section is where he uses a literary device to appeal to his audience's emotions. The final section is where he uses multiple questions to strengthen the

Mack appeals to his audience which helps him succeeds in achieving the ultimate purpose of persuading  his audience to read shakespeare  and helping them relate to his argument by stating certain aspects to help people relate to him whether they're old or young he also throws in figurative language to spice up his argument altogether also he gives valid and strong reasoning for his central argument which grabs the crowds attention. Macks style and appeal to me as a student because his tone throughout the passage is very stable and persuasive he also uses comparisons , potential concerns to guide the reader and keep them interested for example his tone he is writing as if it's a one on one for example stanza 4-6 throughout this stanza

Simply stated, students should study Shakespeare's works in school because of the incredible value within them. In addition to exposing students to a multitude of literary techniques, Shakespeare's plays challenge the student with difficult language and style, express a profound knowledge of human behavior and offer insight into the world around us.William Shakespeare is recognized by much of the world as the greatest of all dramatists. The intricate meanings, extensive vocabulary, and powerful imagery contained within his works demonstrate the phenomenal story telling ability of the English playwright. "Shakespeare's use of poetry within his plays to express the deepest levels of human motivation in individual, social and universal

First and foremost, Mack uses a wide variety of counterclaims to connect with his audience comprised mostly of college students. It’s difficult to convince a group of young adults to read something as old and abstract as Shakespeare, so why not have the group of young adults come to it? Mack refers to an array of different yet everyday people such as a “normal guy” with “bowling buddies” or a student who is looking into something more “professional” (line 59). By doing so, he effectively

One rhetorical device in this paragraph was his point of view. He is talking in the first person. This supports his purpose because it shows that he is standing up for what is right. Another rhetorical device was the time the letter was written. It was written from Birmingham Jail in 1963. One structural device would be the way he is using his past experiences. This shows the reader what he has been through and gives them a better understanding of how he feels.

He repeats the various books that he read and it shows the variety of what he read. For example, he repeats the sentence with “I” and goes on to talk about reading about the horrors of slavery (165). It is not directly claimed, but it can be inferred that what he read had an effect on his goals in later life. This even further shows how using repetition reiterates a thought and drives the thought into the reader’s mind. The extensive examples prove that Malcolm X uses repetition along with anecdotes to remind the reader that the events in the story happened to him and not anyone else.

A modernized text used alongside the original text actually helps many students understand the original version better, and so it can be used as a helpful tool. Even film adaptations can help students understand Shakespeare better, whether they be tight or loose adaptations. As Annie Holleran explains in her article acknowledging the barriers students face in studying Shakespeare: “Watching such tight adaptations of Shakespeare’s plays in the classroom can help students by giving them the opportunity to experience the Bard’s work visually. Being able to watch a play after a class reads it or as they read it presents the opportunity understand the script on a deeper level, a level deeper than one achieved by simple discussion and analysis through close reading” (“How Modern Film Adaptations Can Overcome Barriers in Studying Shakespeare”). If it helps students to grasp the meaning behind the text on a much deeper level, then why is the modernization of Shakespeare even debated? The modernizations should be justified alone by the fact that they are simply a preference of many of Shakespeare’s audiences. Many authors scoff at the fact that the modernization is even considered, but since not everyone understands the way that the Bard writes, it is essential at the bare minimum in order to gradually learn to read and comprehend the original text over time. It should not be expected that modern day students automatically know how to read Shakespeare without any help, they need to be taught. The authors that scoff say that translations are for those who “don’t understand” (“Why “Translating” Shakespeare for the 21st Century is a Bad Idea”), but the important thing is that by using a modernized version as a learning tool, students are at least trying to

Thesis: Throughout the play Macbeth, the reader is given the advantage of knowing more things than the characters in the play through the literary device, dramatic irony. This results in suspense and heightens the flaws of the characters.

Perhaps King would find my analysis bemusing. The Position Paper is unafraid to make a hash of the literary works it yokes together, for the Position Paper is the invention of the very system denied to Chaucer's Parson's parishioners and the children of Gatlin, Nebraska. Every year, as privileged students ready their fertile minds for a semester's worth of Position Papers, the literature of illiteracy, like an off-the-beaten-path mire in the topography of seductive literary topics, waits to be noticed and taken up by an overliterate, overbright undergraduate who will tend to his or her sentences more carefully than he or she ever will to the intellectual needs of the "left behind" in his or her own community. The Position Paper, for all its defects, glistens among rows of other Position Papers of varying quality, all stalked by the presence of an unsettling reality, or statistic, that is only available to them as a story to be analyzed, or a number, like corn, to be

The power of language holds great significance not only in Shakespearean study but of our daily lives as well. Every nuance Shakespeare creates leaves a clue to a greater truth or understanding of our humanity. Exploring the works of Shakespeare with this in mind allows for audiences to gain more appreciation and awareness of the depth of language and communication through his dialogue and characters as Shakespeare: “asks us to adorn the actor with our thoughts and ‘carry them here and there, jumping o’er the times’” (Bevington xiii).

Shakespeare’s work is littered with metaphors; some which require careful reading to pick up on, while others are easily detectable. Simon Palfrey states that “Shakespeare’s

Analyzing Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare Romeo and Juliet is a tragic love story between two teenagers who fall