Rhetorical Analysis: Twob Or Not 2b? By David Crystal

When you see a solider in his or her uniform, you are proud that they are serving this country to protect our freedom, securing our country, and defending democracy worldwide. The solider can come from different branches of the Military. The one you might be familiar with is the U.S. Army. These soldiers are well respected and prepared to serve our country whenever and wherever needed, combat-ready at all times, and trained to counter any threat, anywhere. In 2007, the United States Army department published a recruitment ad for U.S.

We as a society are evolving with each generation to come. We are getting stronger, faster, and smarter. Just as cell phones are no longer square blocks with numbers on them and TV’s are not in black and white, writing itself has also evolved. Once upon a time many wrote and spoke in a Shakespearean form of language and over the years it has evolved into something we call modern English. In recent years, technology has advanced greatly and cell phones have become one of our primary use of communication. With cell phones came a new form of writing called text messaging. Text messaging is used to send short, concise messages to anyone around the world. Often times text messages involve the use of abbreviations which stand for different things and also involves frequent use of emoji’s as a form of expression. This form of writing is now considered informal writing and is not acceptable in academic settings. In Michaela Cullington’s essay “Does Texting Affect Writing?” she touches on both sides of whether texting is hindering students writing or if it’s actually having a positive effect. She then makes is clear that she believes most students are educated enough to know when text speak is appropriate and when it’s not so therefore it has no effect on students. Although, I agree with her thesis, she lacks credibility due to her insufficient evidence. In addition, I also believe

Paul Chappell, the peace literacy director of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, will be a keynote speaker at the upcoming G3X Conference at Mihaylo College this August. The advocate for peaceful and nonviolent solutions to personal and global challenges shares his ethos and passion.

In trying to prove this point she appeals to by using ethos to help strengthen her argument. She states “to the Native Americans whose languages are just a few years away from extinction, the loss goes to the heart of their identity. It’s a matter of cultural survival.” This is a clear appeal to one's emotions to bring out an emotional response a feeling of sadness for the native american people the article is based around. Ethos in this sense can be used to help place the reader in the shoes of the subject and help see from the subjects point of

The separation of church and state is an ongoing debate that effects everyone, even if you are not aware of it. There are many arguments to this debate, and both sides are heavily supported. I will be analyzing two sources that support the separation of church and state but used two different forms of rhetoric to support the separation.

Oratory is about getting the job done as quickly as possible and not how efficiently or the best way to fulfill it. With Socrate’s discussion with Callicles, he determines what he is looking to fulfill and what oratory accomplishes, he declares, “I’d like to find out from the man what his craft can accomplish, and what it is that he both makes claims about and teaches” (Plato, 1987, p.2). Oratory has the power to persuade people into specific ways of thinking and producing information on what is being told. I see it as being a public speaker is essentially being an orator, not only is the orator expressing their beliefs to the public, but they are also persuading their viewers into believing they are skilled and how they should follow their

Many things in our world go unnoticed and the people do not know the reason it started or who started them. 99 percent invisible is a small radio show, that raises attention to the things that go unnoticed in the world that shape it. Aids awareness is one of them when an art project started by a group called visual aids that created red ribbons to raise awareness for this issue. 99 percent invisible brings light to the people behind the start of a powerful movement that has affected the world. This podcast is highly effective and well done, it gives all the information needed in a very audience-friendly manner.

F-A-T. Fat, fat, fat. Usually this word has a bad connotation attached, linked, or embedded into it. Being fat shouldn’t be looked down upon or be ashamed of since F.A.T is a Freaking Amazing Thing. I believe we were all made differently with our own ways to flaunt or exude our natural beauty. You are uniquely you.

Water metaphors are often used in public policy discourse as a way to help audiences understand immigration. It is important that the diction used in immigration discourse be studied because word choice is responsible for the context and understanding of various subjects. If audiences don’t dive deeper into metaphorical analysis, they may accept ideas as they are presented, rather than forming their own opinions of controversial topics. In this paper, I will argue that the use of the “flood” metaphor is not appropriate in immigration discourse because it equates immigration to a natural disaster and implies that the United States government has no control over immigration policy. To accomplish this task, I will be analyzing three articles written

British philosopher Jeremy Bentham famously coined the phrase, “It is the greatest good to the greatest number of people which is the measure of right and wrong.” What defines as a “good” for one person, may not necessarily be the same definition for another. However, Garrett Hardin defines what the “greatest good” is for our society in his essay titled, “Tragedy of the Commons,” in which he argues that in order to preserve the commons we must surrender our inalienable right to breed. Similarly, Peter Singer writes in piece titled, “Animal Liberation,” that, like humans, animals feel pain and therefore should be considered part of our society which requires humans to adjust and conform to meet the demanding needs of this particular group. Utilitarianism

When people speak to one another they usually do so very rapidly, and subconsciously. The opposite can be said of writing as it is more slow, and deliberate, often requiring intense thought. As demonstrated already in English 101 it is necessary to visualize, plan, and draft while writing. The principles of oration were separate from those of writing until the Age of Information, with the development of modern technology. The proverbial gap was abridged with texting. It allowed writing to catch up to the speed of speaking. Unfortunately while it did match the speed, it took away formalities used in writing such as spelling, punctuation, and using capital letters.

     Cullington then talks about her personal experiences about texting and whether it had an effect on her or not. She states that she is a texter. However, she enjoys it regardless of what others think about it. She feels confident in her writing skills which causes her to succeed  as much as she does. She does not notice the negative affects on her writing skills because of texting. (Cullington 369). Cullington then admit that she rarely uses abbreviations in her texting, and she never uses them in her formal writing which is kind of accurate compared to someone who does use abbreviations in texting would most likely always or sometimes uses them in the formal writings.

John McWhorter believes that texting has not degraded the language of society today. In his speech he also stated that being able to text and write formally is beneficial to teenagers and young adults today. I agree with John McWhorter, because most of the people in the world to do not use formal language in casual conversation. This leads to the point of why should we use formal writing for casual writing. I believe it is important to be diverse and have the ability to communicate in many different ways. John McWhorter also explained that it does not matter what decade it is, there will always be individuals who do not agree with how the English language and writing has developed. Texting has not made the American English

In Zadie Smith’s essay “Generation Why”, Smith uses many types of persuasive tactics to convince the readers that Facebook or social media is ruining the generations. Her goal was to give the readers a distinct perspective on how they perceive the social networks. Throughout the essay you may find her words to be offensive or sarcastic, but she still manages to get her point across. However, three specific tactics stood out to me. They are ethos, pathos and logos. I read this article by Big Fish Presentations called “3 Ways to Persuade Your Audience.” In the article, the Big Fish presenters talked mainly on the topic of ethos, pathos and logos. They stated, “When used effectively, these three appeals can be powerful tools for achieving a speaker’s persuasive goal.” However, I feel to believe that Zadie Smith did not execute all three of them for these tactics to be successful or effective in her essay. There are many distinguishable ways that she could have utilized ethos, pathos and logos. However, the manner that she went about it was unexploited.

In today’s world of text messaging, through short messaging system many users are using abbreviated and non conventional language which has a negative consequence on literacy. Powell and Dixon (2011) worked on the impact of texting abbreviations called ‘textisms’, misspellings and correctly spelled words on adults spelling. An Example of textism is ‘gn’, correctly spelled is ‘goodnight’ and the misspelling is ‘gudnite’. They examined a group of participants before and after the exposure of the same words, and found that textisms have a negative impact on participants spelling when compared to misspellings.