preview

Rhetorical Devices In One Art

Decent Essays
Open Document

Bishop started to lose her peacefulness. In the ending lines, the author tried to reassure herself that the loss of love will not cause her to lose her power over herself. At the end of the poem, the author is pushing herself on, and forcing herself to write the poem and pray that it turns into reality in the end. Her inner fight comes all the way through at the end, when she “explodes” and changes her tone. Bishop gives all the way in and finally lets herself to start feeling the way her heart tells her to feel. It is nearly as she is preparing herself throughout the poem to let inner, emotional self out, and to finally acknowledge that she was lying to her and readers as well about mastering a disaster. When readers take a deeper view on Bishop’s lines, they …show more content…

The harmony is seen in the paradox itself. The speaker is saying, ironically, that no matter how much of a master of loss one becomes disaster can still happen. The chain brings the speaker from denotative meaning to connotative meaning. And all the rhymes and repetition show that the speaker is in conflict with herself about accepting things that she wrote. Everything comes to one point, and that point indicates that losses are tragedies regardless of how much a person is ready for them. The paradox of the poem, according to a critique, Alport Andrew, is how Bishop uses paradox to reassure the readers throughout the poem, but she fails to do so. In “One Art,” Bishop’s main focus is to explain and convince readers how everything is survivable, and how every loss is something they will survive; the interesting part is how everything shatters at the last stanza where she almost confesses her fake optimism for surviving. The Author showed a large scale of contradiction and paradox by use of elements of writing such as repetition, allegory, rhyming, and

Get Access