Rhetorical Devices In The Striped For Parts

Process of transplantation: “patient is identified as ill and organ failing, doctor assesses if eligible for transplant” (Ethics of Organ Transplantation, 2004, p. 6). “If so, doctor refers patient to local transplant center to be placed on the list” (Ethics of Organ Transplantation, 2004, p. 6). “The transplant center evaluates the patient’s health and mental status as well as the level of social support to see if the person is a viable candidate” (Ethics of Organ Transplantation, 2004, p. 6). “Organs can come from recently deceased people, cadavers, or living persons” (Ethics of Organ Transplantation, 2004, p. 6). “The waiting list for donors is maintained by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)” (Ethics of Organ Transplantation, 2004, p. 6). Now that I’ve set the basic principle for what an organ transplant

Available became controversial. While the question of the dialysis machine is still controversial, the health system was caught in another ethical dilemma regarding organ transplantation. Organ transplantation is closely linked to the issue of cleanliness because patients with kidney failure can get an organ transplant as an alternative to hemodialysis. The issue is complicated by the fact Medicare is financed by organ transplant, and there are those who believe that the distribution of rare transplant is not right. There are thousands of terminal patients whose lives can be saved by organ transplantation, but there are no formulas of work that can be used to determine which of the thousands of patients will be given priority. It is left to the discretion of medical officers to decide who is worth saving. The ability to keep someone alive by replacing one or more of their major organs is a splendid achievement of medicine of the 20th century.

Organ donation has been a major controversy for many years now. There are those people who favor it and the ones who do not. According to the United States Organ and Tissue Transplantation Association, organ donation is defined as tissue or organ removal from a deceased or living donor, for transplantation purposes. Tissues and organs are moved in a surgical procedure. Afterwards, they are transplanted to a recipient to ensure their recovery (Francis 2015). Organ donation appeals to the the pathos and ethos in attempt to convince people to be more understand of the concept. The purpose of this rhetorical analysis is to help people better understand the organ donation controversy.

The problems plaguing the current state of organ transplantation are more multidimensional than numbers. Issues are present from the national level all the down to the individual patient. Right at the onset of the entire process, identifying potential donors is difficult and problematic to subject to a set of standardized criteria. One of the reasons for this is that the sources of organs are varied. Still, the primary source of organ donation is cadavers. To certify death, the accepted criteria is that of brain death. After certification, another issue is ensuring the condition of the organs is maintained in a manner acceptable to be transplanted. Yet another issue is that the list is not static. The condition of patients can unfortunately deteriorate to the point where their eligibility to be placed on the list is lost. Additionally, given the chronic shortage of organs available and the extended amount of time some patients have to wait, some patients die before they are reached on the list.

For this reason, according to Pete Du Pont, “instead of looking for new ways to ration organs or take them prematurely, we should ask how we can increase the supply of organs so that doctors are not forced to decide who lives and who dies” (483). There is a misconception that doctors determine which of the organ donors die and which of the recipients live. Conversely, the reality is that the United Network for Organ Sharing has set up a complex system which only determines a person’s place on the list of recipients based on medical evaluation, not who loses his or her life donating their

There have been recent advances in organ transplants that have created new hope for treatmenst in kidney and liver diseases. On the other hand, these breakthroughs create ethical and moral conundrums of plethora in religions and cultures. Now, there are many cultures that support organ transplant. However, there are many cultures that are in dissent with organ transplants. This paper will explore the positive efforts of organ transplant on different cultures and their moral implication.

There have been, for many years, a number of social, legal and ethical questions raised regarding organ donation and transplantation. However, as the science of medicine has developed over the years, so have patient care needs, the practice of medicine itself, and the laws implemented by the governments of various countries. Naturally, many of the ethical issues that face society, scientists, and doctors change, and therefore require careful scrutiny. Whilst the progression of scientific knowledge, technology and techniques have solved many of these ethical problems, a number of these issues still persist because medicine has not yet provided a solution or because society is reluctant to accept the solutions that have been suggested (Diethelm,

The world has been around for a long time and never has there been a need for organ donation as there is now. When a person’s organ is failing from disease, they are placed on the transplant list. An organ transplant is define as one organ is taken from a donor and put in a recipient’s body to replace the diseased organ. Organ transplantation is a life-giving gift to a dying person. In 1988, between kidneys, lungs, heart, and liver, there were 12,301 transplants performed and 15,638 organs needed (Kaserman, Table 1&2, 2007). In 2003, between those same organs, there were 23,941 performed, a total of 84,951organs were needed to fill the waiting list (Kaserman, Table 1&2, 2007), and the

The need for organ transplantation has rapidly increased all over the world during the past decade or so due to the increased incidence of vital organ failure. Unfortunately, the unavailability of adequate organs for transplantation has resulted in major organ shortage crises. As a result there has been a major increase in the number of patients in need of transplantation and in the number of patients dying while on the waiting list. Debates about

Medical advancements have created a significantly safer process with reduced risks for everyone involved. Professional medical teams examine each possible organ and declare whether it is healthy and suitable to be transplanted or if it is unsafe. This examination procedure ensures that the organs are functioning and will not create more issues in the recipient’s body. One article describes the process by saying “Transplant teams run various tests on the organ to ensure it is

There is a limited supply of organs that are obtainable to those who need it. One significant problem in society is deciding who should receive the few available ones. Chapter 8 covers the issue of determining who is deserving of organs and how they should be distributed.

Human life is an extremely delicate balance to maintain, but through research the knowledge of medicine that increased through the decades that has helped improve lives. In the 18th century the life expectancy was 30 years old due to poor health, and it has more than double due to the advancements of the medical community. In the recent past, individuals that had a death sentence due to organ failure are now living past these disease associated with organ failure through the use of organ transplantation. Individuals can gain a much needed life change through a couple different routes such as from a living donor to living donor or through deceased donor to living donor. However, these changes in medicine have raised multiple ethical issue involved when dealing with organ donation such as the presumed consent (opting out system) or requested consent (opting in system), the compensation for organ donations and there are religious and cultural norms that the

There are recent advances in organ transplants that have created new hope for treatment of kidney and liver disease, However, these breakthroughs create ethical and moral conundrums for a plethora of religions and cultures. There are many cultures that are in dissent with organ transplantation. However, there are many cultures that support organ transplantation. This paper will explore the positive efforts of organ transplantation on different cultures and their moral implication.

Organ donation is a significantly selfless way to give back to the world, making a huge difference in a someone's life and giving them a second chance at prolonging their lives. People should be educated on the shortages there are for donations globally, they should also be aware of how many people can be impacted by this process. The donation of organs is not only an important decision to make for yourself, but it gives an opportunity to help save a life and create a second chance for others. Mutually, understanding why a person should donate will bring them closer helping others, specifically due to the lack of availability and the growing cause for organ donation. The core to understanding the background, the need for donations, the composition of donations, the importance and impact personally, and also the opposition of organ donation are key for the group that may not be primarily drawn to this type of service.

that it was something we had to do – give the gift of life and use our