Richard Plantagenet Research Paper

Heath can be seen to be a successful leader due to the fact he won the 1970 election, much to Harold Wilson’s surprise. However, many would place the win not down to the

While Richard left England to oversee the progress of his foreign war, Henry and the other nobles began plans to take Richard's kingdom. This was a crucial mistake on Richard's part. By not taking care of issues on the domestic front, Richard's followers and soldiers grew increasingly weary of his ability to lead and be an effective king, eventually siding with Henry. Henry proceeded to capture Bristol Castle, a stronghold of Richard's and began his plans on being ordained future king.

Richard’s political ambition is revealed through his strategic calculations based on the order of birth in his York family which puts him third away from the throne. Ahead of him is his elder brother, George Clarence, a barrier which will have to eradicate. His brother, King Edward, is another political barrier, by simply being alive, in power and equally by being the father of the two young princes . Richard’s creates a political mistrust between his two

Although the UK Prime Minister is elected separately through Parliamentary elections, unlike the USA President, there is a trend for Prime Ministers to claim popular authority on the basis of electoral victory. Prime Ministers have therefore become the ideological consciences of their

His family was not traceable also he has never been photographed. It is suspected that he still is in London.

"The Progressive Liberals came first in the number of votes cast at the election, and while I most certainly congratulate them on this achievement, with the happiness and post-electoral emotion comes a great deal of responsibility. Having secured such result on polling day, and a considerable number of seats in Parliament, Mr. Thicke, alongside the leaders of the other two big parties, hold responsibility for providing this country with a stable government enjoying a workable majority in the Commons.

Richard is speaking about how he came into this world an unfinished person and for that he hates God and his creations. Even though he hates God, he still uses him to gain leverage on people like the Mayor and the Citizens. He fakes praying and has Buckingham tell the people he is:

Throughout history there has always been revolutions, change, and reforms. In 1832, England experienced the death of George IV and accession of William IV in 1830 ,that resulted in a general parliamentary election in which the opposition political party, the Whigs, scored major gains with their platform calling for parliamentary reform. With the Tory party divided, the king asked the leader of the Whigs, Earl Grey, to form a government. Immediately, the Whigs introduced a major reform bill designed to increase the number of voters by 50 percent and to eliminate underpopulated electoral districts (“rotten boroughs”) and replace them with representatives for previously unrepresented manufacturing districts and cities, especially in the industrial

Another contributing factor at this election may have been performance in office, which in the above statement is not seen as important as personality and image. However, performance in office may have been extremely detrimental for the conservatives in 1997 because of their crisis in 1992. This focuses on the retrospective model, as people saw the Conservatives as incompetent in handling the economy because of Black Wednesday in September 1992. The Conservatives and especially Noramnt Lamont, Chancellor of the Exchequer, were to blame for the crisis that saw the pound forced out of the ERM. This didn’t help at the 1997 general election where they did extremely badly in a huge Labour win.

This inner circle was comprised of Richard’s childhood friends and advisors: Simon Burley, his tutor; Robert de Vere, Michael de la Porte, his chancellor; and Thomas Mowbray, his long-time friend. As Richard started to not follow the wills of Parliament and assume his own power, the political community united against him and demanded that some of his councillors be removed. At the center of this opposition was the Lords Appellant, which was headed by the Duke of Gloucester, the Earl of Warwick and the Earl of Arundel, all very powerful at the time. Richard resisted their commands, resulting in his replacement by a “Council of Government”. Richard attempted to arrest the Earl of Arundel, but his royalist army was miniscule compared to the combined strength of the lords’ armies, resulting in a period of captivity in 1388. Meanwhile, Parliament became ruthless and known as “The Merciless Parliament”, accusing Richard’s councillors of treason, all the while attempting to justify their claims and executions using common law. As Alan Rogers, who is associated with Temple University School of Law, points out, “ If it [Parliament] could be induced to accept an appeal under common law procedure, so much the better, for then the legality of the proceedings could hardly be called in question. If not, then parliament must create its own procedure; it would be

Prime Minister Christie is confronted with the difficulty of leading a large majority in parliament. There's absolutely no guarantee of harmony in the corridors of power and politics. There's no evidence to suggest that the governing party is deeply divided, we bear witness to the political consequences of adding a new element of uncertainty to the mix. Any parliamentarian will tell you that YOUR worst day in government is a hundred times better than your best day in opposition. The Progressive Liberal Party are now learning that your worst day with a majority is about a thousand times better than your best with a minority. Political parties cannot ignore the influence of back-benches nor can they deny their significance. Where there lacks

Here it sounds like he is talking about how cruel Richard is because he has destroyed good people, Namely; Anthony, Richard Grey, and Thomas Vaughan. Each were considered loyal to the children and would never have come to their untimely demise if Richard had never gained the Crown. So, how could anyone consider themselves safe under his

Richard’s recent fear mongering campaign did the trick, accompanied by his equally amoral vice president Buckingham. His campaign pushing him over the line in favourability with the vulnerable American public, people are scared, and Richard played that aspect like a fiddle. Many political forecasters are predicting that this will be a key technique for Richard in his

Richard II is an authoritative and greedy king of England, and he is living in a period of transition that medieval knights who are swearing total loyalty to a king has been disappearing and an aristocracy starts to gain a power for their own good. However, Richard II keeps believing the power of kingship, and he also is too confident himself. He overestimates his authority and power; furthermore, he ignores the periodical change. Therefore, he speaks confidently how firm his position as king is to the people in Wales, but his attitude changes when he suffers a defeat by Henry Bolingbroke that he

A general finish of most pundits is that Richard II is a play about the affidavit of a "frail and feminine" ruler. That he was a feeble ruler, will be yielded. That he was a mediocre individual, won't. The understanding to Richard's character and inspiration is to see him as a man reliably acting his way through life. Richard was a man who held extraordinary love for show and function. This peculiarity positively drove him to settle on choices as lord that were poor, and in actuality a maladroit ruler. Notwithstanding this imperfection in character, Richard could be seen as a clever, wise individual, yet illsuited for his acquired occupation.