Richard Powers once said “The history of art is the history of iconoclasm, the history of some new voice saying that everything you know is wrong.” What does Mr. Powers mean by this statement? To understand what he means we first have to go back and look at what iconoclasm means. Iconoclasm means the doctrine or practice of an iconoclast, which in turn means a person who criticizes or opposes widely accepted practices and beliefs. To further understand the statement said by Mr. Powers we will also have to look at the history of iconoclasm, current iconoclastic events, study when the desire of preservation of icons becomes a form of worship, and whether the worship of the icon is the same as worshiping the beliefs or practices they represent. …show more content…
This question in itself brings up a whole new polemic. Many would say the worshiping of what the artwork stands for would be constant praise or constantly bringing up the work. Others would believe that when the practices the artworks represent would become a form of worship. Yet, others would believe that a mixture of other two groups is a sure sign of worship. But, can someone worship a piece of artwork and not worship the practices it represents? Personally I believe that it can happen that a person can worship the artwork but not the practices. While in other situations the person can worship the practices and not agree or worship the work itself. What does it really mean to worship an artwork rather than what it embodies? How far would the worship of the work go until it would be considered idolatry? To some worshiping an artwork is to constantly praise it and use it as a reference when looking at the quality of other works done. To worship a piece rather than to worship the beliefs it represents is to hold that piece in high regards but not agree with the practices or beliefs shown in the piece or to not care for those beliefs or practices. Yet, to idolize a work would be to believe that the work being worshipped is a manifestation of a god, or to believe that the work has all the power and believe that it speaks to people to do things. Many will say that idolizing an artwork or object and worshiping the object without regards for the purpose of the work are the same thing. In some cases that line between idolizing a work and worshiping the work without regards to the purpose or back story are sometimes blurred when certain things come into play. For example, both ideas hold high regards for the work yet idolizing the work ties it to a religion, practice, or belief. While the other simply does not care for the belief,
Understanding art is often thought of as being an unreachable goal, but art should not be considered arbitrary because it influences the cultures and societies around us. The purpose of this paper is to define and also establish my opinions on Pensacola Christian College’s (PCC) definition of art, the bibliosophy of art, and Dr. Francis Schaeffer’s criteria for art. These topics are useful for artists as well as anyone else critiquing art, and can also serve as guidelines and standards for an artist when they create art.
The ideas, beliefs and values we hold so strong to ourselves dictate the way we see art, literature and the world. The way we see history and
Piece displayed at museums, sold on streets, etc. are art. Society controls what is art. Offensive, destructive, or vandalized pieces are often not referred to as art. Art is often associated with an object that was created by a person. Pieces can be displayed in many places to convey a message. Pieces displayed in museums are seen as good, famous, and valuable. These pieces are displayed because they often do not create conflict between people.
George Orwell famously declared »all art is propaganda.« Great works of art, in other words, have a very particular message for an intended audience. This function of art transcends historical periods, as is evident if one takes a closer look at the art of specific eras, such as Ancient Egyptian art. Ancient Egyptian art possessed a very specific propaganda function: to promote the divine origins and authority of the Pharaoh and thus a hierarchical social system.
Delia lives in California with her mom. Her mom is an environmentalist and sets out to Antarctica to make experiments. One day when Delia comes home from school, her mom’s boss is there to tell Delia that her mom is dead. She does not believe him but everybody, including her maid, does. Since her dad is dead and supposedly her mom is too, Delia is sent of to New York to live with two aunts she never meet. Once there Delia gets to meet her to aunts. Charlie, with whom Delia lives with, is older but has a child’s mind. Province is serious and in charge of Delia’s education. The aunts hate each other but Delia prefers Charlie. Since Province is in charge of Delia’s education, she sends her to a good private school. In school, Delia meets Natalie
When you go to an art show do you understand the symbolic interpretation of the pieces? Don’t feel bad, most people don’t. What’s so upsetting about that is that you really miss out on the experience. When I think about interpretation of art I think of Andy Warhol. Andy Warhol’s use of iconography changed not only the art world but the people who came into contact with his art. Once you understand his life and art, you will understand his art as a symbolic representation.
Sontag says that throughout history, things focused on in art and history tend to be the "product of wrath, divine or human." There is much art showing the
I agree with James Baldwin’s idea because if a person painted, scripture, calligraphy and any artwork, then the art work can be creative by reflecting the society but it does not belong to you.
Who is to say a work of art is good or bad? But the underlying issue is whether or not the government funding should be restricted. One of the most thought-provoking concepts and quite possibly the answer to the problem is the idea supported by Douglas's statement: "Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions" (14).
Throughout the vast history of art, historians can find connections throughout the centuries. Artists from the beginning of humankind have been inspired by the world around them. From the Apollo 11 stones to present day, history and culture have provided inspiration and have been the focus of various pieces. Examining artwork from the 15th-18th century, viewers can be shown a whole world that would be unknown to us without these artist’s contributions. History, religion, and cultural events have sculpted the art world, and we can observe this through many pieces during the 15th-18th centuries.
For over two thousand years, various philosophers have questioned the influence of art in our society. They have used abstract reasoning, human emotions, and logic to go beyond this world in the search for answers about arts' existence. For philosophers, art was not viewed for its own beauty, but rather for the question of how art and artists can help make our society more stable for the next generation. Plato, a Greek philosopher who lived during 420-348 B.C. in Athens, and Aristotle, Plato’s student who argued against his beliefs, have no exceptions to the steps they had to take in order to understand the purpose of art and artists. Though these two philosophers made marvelous discoveries about the existence of art, artists, and
The Global human population increases growth amounts to around 75 million annually, or 1.1% per year. The global population has grown from 1 billion in 1800 to 7 billion in 2012. It is expected to keep growing, and estimates have put the total population at 8.4 billion by mid-2030, and 9.6 billion by mid-2050. Many nations with rapid population growth have low standards of living, whereas many nations with low rates of population growth have high standards of living.
Throughout history, the issue of appropriation in art has become a heated debate on whether it is good or whether it is bad. Appropriation is fundamentally the act of taking something from somewhere else and placing it into a new context. In art, appropriation is seen as using (or taking) someone else's artwork, manipulating it and ultimately changing the whole meaning behind the work. It is seen as a significant issue as many people (including art critics, art historians and art enthusiasts) see appropriation as whilst, others see it as being inappropriate and immoral, and see the growth in appropriation as being a destroyer of art. It is of the opinion that art indeed "feeds off itself" and every artwork, art movement, and art period is
(i) It is pointed out that Malthus’s pessimistic conclusions have not been borne out by the history of Western European countries. Gloomy forecast made by Malthus about the economic conditions of future generations of mankind has been falsified in the Western world. Population has not increased as rapidly as predicted by Malthus; on the other hand, production has increased tremendously because of the rapid advances in technology. As a result, living standards of the people have risen instead of falling as was predicted by Malthus.
The history of art dates back to ancient times. Artwork can be, and was, found around the world. What makes art interesting is that it can be created in any way, shape or form with any materials. It seems that the artwork can also tell us a lot about the artist. Art seems to be simply, a direct, visual reflection of the artist’s life. Therefore, one can assume that an artist’s life experiences and beliefs directly influence their art. If we look at examples from different periods of art we will be able to see the connection between the artist and the art.