preview

Right To Vote Essay

Decent Essays

The justification for the laws that prevent convicted felons the right to vote is that since they have committed a felony, they should not have the right to vote. Voting may be a right for U.S. Citizens in this country. However, once you commit an act of crime, that right will be taken away which is referred to as “disenfranchising convicts”. The disenfranchising of convicts is justified because since they have committed a crime, they lose some of their rights voting being one of them. If a criminal commits a crime, there is prison which serves as punishment for the criminal act. Since prison must be a punishment, criminals do not have the right to vote because they have not abided by the laws, hence their right to vote as they once saw it, …show more content…

However, since they chose to commit the crime, I do not believe there is much effect with taking away voting rights from offenders. According to Nonprofitvote.org, when offenders serve the sentence that was appointed to them, their voting rights get restored to the offenders depending on their state of residency. Although that is not the case in four states, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, and Virginia, in which they can only be restored when the individual files an application to the government. In some states offenders restore their right once they are completely done with their sentence and parole, while others don’t even lose their voting right while incarcerated such as in Maine and Vermont. No, I do not believe that taking away the right to vote from an offender contributes to the labeling of ex-offenders. The labeling of offenders will always exist whether or not they have the right to vote. A sex offender will always be known as a sex offender, a murderer as a murderer and so on. Just because the justice system decides to give or to take the right to vote from offenders, will not contribute unfairly to the labeling of

Get Access