Rights of Privacy in the Private Sector Workplace Essay

The Founding Father envisioned America to be a nation where the people were able to walk on a land of freedom. After the road to victory from the American Revolution, the Founding Fathers set up a government that was formed to protect the rights of the citizens after their treatment with British Monarchy. Contrast to the British Parliament that declined the voice of the people; the Founding Fathers intended for the people to have their voice heard and not to be oppressed. In addition, the Founders Fathers intended for American citizens to trust and rely on their government, and live in a society where their rights were not being compromise. However, in recent times, the government has passed multiple laws that disregard and violate our right of privacy. The Federal government is obligated to protect privacy as an individual right as shown through Supreme Court cases, the Bill of Rights, and the liberty clause within the fourteenth amendment.

Technology has developed in leaps and bounds over the past few decades. The case is that the law always has difficulty keeping pace with new issues and technology and the few laws that are enacted are usually very general and obsucre. The main topic of this paper is to address the effect of technology on privacy in the workplace. We have to have an understanding of privacy before trying to protect it. Based on the Gift of Fire, privacy has three pieces: freedom from intrusion, control of information about one's self, and freedom from surveillance.1 People's rights has always been protected by the constitution such as the Fourth Amendment, which protects people from "unreasonable searches and

While there is no “right to privacy” explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court believes that several of the Amendments embody this right; specifically the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments [6]. The First Amendment protects the privacy of one’s beliefs [6]. The Third Amendment protects the privacy of the home against it being forcibly used to house soldiers [6]. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches [6]. The Fifth Amendment protects the privacy of personal information [6]. The Fourteenth Amendment provides for a right to liberty in the areas of family, marriage, motherhood, procreation, and child rearing [6]. And lastly the Ninth Amendment is a “catch-all,” declaring that just because a

The first amendment allows the person privacy of beliefs, the fifth amendment give the person privacy of personal information and other amendments gives the person the right of privacy. Some people still argue that Americans doesn’t have the right of privacy. The supreme court, however, recognized that the 14th amendment gives the person privacy in different subjects. After that the court stated that the person has the right for privacy and the person makes his own decision. This source is useful as it supports the idea that americans has the right for privacy. This source is a reliable source as it is published on laws which is a website for publishing articles especially political ones. I think other sources were more helpful as they specified the advantages and the disadvantages of the americans privacy. I can use this source to prove that the right to privacy was one of the amendments in the Bill of

Since the time the framers of the constitution, technology has improved significantly which has led to an increasing concern in the privacy of an individual. Technology, used by government agencies and commercial enterprises, has led to a change in one’s privacy and freedom. For this reason, the agencies and enterprises have been called into question of infringement of the fourth. Using the lessons learned from history, the framers of the constitutions created the fourth amendment, which protects from unreasonable searches, and the fifth amendment, which prevents a person from incriminating himself or herself, to create a government with just laws, but with the advancement in technology, the fourth amendment needs to expand its policies to fit the changes in modern society.

I think the 4th Amendment is the one most related to the right of privacy. Some of the challenges is that certain information might jeopardize national security, not only in the case of international terrorism, like 911, but also domestically. Another situation is the invasion of privacy of everyday citizens, that don’t possess any terroristic threats. According to an intelligence lawyer, the data are not covered by the Fourth Amendment, which protects Americans against unreasonable searches and seizures.

"There is no explicit mention of privacy in the United States Constitution. But the courts have found a constitutional basis for privacy rights in the broad sense of freedom from interference in certain intimate realms of personal life. This is based on the protection of individual liberty from government interference in the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth amendments to the Constitution. 3 The First Amendment protection of the freedoms of speech, assembly, religious practice, and so on, could also be seen as privacy protection in this sense. On the other hand, the right to free speech could be used to defend someone who invaded the privacy of others by publishing or disclosing their personal information.

As the Fourth Amendment recognizes the right to privacy, its application has the tendency to spark debate among individuals (Peak).

In 1787, the constitution was born. The constitution has been America’s guideline to the American way of life. Our US constitution has many points in it to protect America and it’s people from an overpowered government, our economy, and ourselves. The only thing the constitution doesn’t directly give us, is our right to privacy, and our right to privacy has been a big concern lately courtesy of the National Security Agency (NSA).(#7) Although our constitution doesn’t necessarily cover the privacy topic, it does suggest that privacy is a given right. Some people say that the right to privacy was so obvious, that our founding fathers didn’t even feel the need to make a point about it.(#9) It also didn’t help

This statement implies that there are certain rights out there that are not specifically spelled out in the Constitution, and the Supreme Court has used this amendment by saying that the right to privacy fits in here. Finally the 3 Fourteenth Amendment which gives notion that every citizen has the right to due process. Also, the Fourteenth Amendment states, “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States…” (Constitution of the U.S). The right to privacy is implied in the Constitution in a number of different amendments.

Within the Constitution of the United States of America, the word “privacy” appears exactly zero times. Not once does the legal document that outlines the social order of the United Sates, define, or explicitly state a “right to privacy” for its citizens. Even with this fact prevailing over society, American citizens still esteem privacy in the highest regard. According to a survey conducted by the PEW Research Center, a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America, “93 percent of adults say that being in control of who can get information about them is important… 88 percent [of Americans] say it is important that they not have someone watch or listen to them without their

"Where is the right to privacy found?" How does this help us as American citizens in the fight for our rights? It seems as though this is a never ending battle between the government and society, especially in the sense of contraceptives, abortions, and same-sex relations. There are many issues when it comes to our privacy, but the fight comes down to what does the Bill of Rights say directly and indirectly. No one can say that the framers of the Constitution could have predicted these issues that we have today.

As indicated by some people, the privacy right ought to be extended to workplaces. In the meantime, other individuals feel that this extension would encompass an unnecessary incursion into the managing rights of the management. In a working environment, the right to privacy of employees is a primarily controversial legal topic. This is even more of a concern or of an issue during this age of increased dependence on electronic mail and computers to do business. Because of innovation technology, employers have been enabled to monitor working environment correspondence that happens by means of PCs, for example, messages and Internet utilization. A majority of the employees feel that such observing abuses their privacy rights. Nevertheless, the law does permit it. Some employee activities like private discussions and actual physical spaces at the workplace such as the locked desk drawers are under more privacy protections. Hence, there is a great need for the employers to consider circumstances under which he or she wants to conduct an investigation.

The right to privacy is one of the most important rights in America. It is the foundation of our beliefs, our independence and our freedom. Without our privacy rights, first developed in the landmark case, Griswold v. Connecticut, the democratic system that we know couldn’t really exist. The United States Constitution does not specifically

"Privacy. There seems to be no legal issue today that cuts so wide a swath through conflicts confronting American society: from AIDS tests to wiretaps, polygraph test to computerized data bases, the common denominator has been whether the right to privacy outweighs other concerns of society…" This quote from Robert Ellis Smith explains, in one sentence, the absolute need to ensure privacy in the workplace. One of the most interesting, yet controversial, areas concerning public personnel is employee privacy. What limits are there to employers’ intrusions into, and control over, employees’ behaviors and personal properties?