Rio Grande Valley Essay

On the southernmost tip of Texas and adjacent to Mexico, lies the Rio Grande Valley, an area rich in Hispanic culture. Even though it is a tourist attraction for its wildlife refuge and wide sandy beaches, the Rio Grande Valley is considered to be one of the poorest regions in the United States. Different factors contribute to the high levels of poverty. These factors include the great influx of Mexican immigrants who have very high poverty rates, the availability of mostly minimum wage paying jobs which contributes to a majority of the children being raised in households that are below the poverty level, and the low levels of post-secondary education acquired by these children who were raised in poverty. Due to the high levels of poverty,

When a person is in a stressful situation on instinct they have two options, fight or flight. In war the same is true. War is not always bayonets and bullets, it’s the decisions you make during times of hardship. A soldier has to make the decision whether to keep fighting for what they believe in no matter what the stakes or to flee. In December of 1777, George Washington and his troops arrived at Valley Forge. Since the summer of 1775, all has gone well for the Continental Army. More recently Washington was presumably unable to stop General Howe and his British soldiers from claiming the national capital of Philadelphia. With Howe and his army of approximately 18,000 comfortably quartered in Philadelphia,

One of the largest geographic physical structures in the United States is the Colorado River. Human activity and its interaction with this great river have an interesting history. The resources provided by the river have been used by humans, and caused conflict for human populations as well. One of these conflicts is water distribution, and the effects drought conditions have played in this distribution throughout the southwestern region. Major cities such as Las Vegas, Los Angeles, San Diego, and other communities in the southwest depend on the river. It provides water for over 20 million people, irrigation for 2 million acres of land, four thousand megawatts of hydroelectric energy, and over twenty million annual visitors for

Have you ever been in a place of green with forests and animals everywhere? Well, where some of the Native Americans lived, there were such things. Native American tribes such as the Crow lived in the Great Plains. The Crow tribe of the Great Plains were nomadic and followed the buffalo migrations which provided their food. This tribe spent a good part of the year living in camps that could easily be dismantled and moved to follow the buffalo migrations. Other tribes of the plains were more sedentary. These tribes lived in permanent villages year round.

The Colorado River Basin starts in the Rocky Mountains and cuts through 1500 miles of canyon lands and deserts of seven US states and two Mexican states to supply a collection of dams and reservoirs with water to help irrigate cropland, support 40 million people, and provide hydroelectric power for the inland western United States [1,2]. From early settlement, rights over the river have been debated and reassigned to different states in the upper and lower basin; however, all the distribution patterns lead to excessive consumption of the resource. In 1922, the seven US states signed into the Colorado River Compact, which outlined the policy for the distribution rights to the water [3], however, this compact was written during an exceptionally

Q3. How has NAFTA impacted the U.S.? Overall, do you believe that it was a positive move for the U.S.? Why or why not?

Nueces and the Del Norte (Rio Grande). " This had become necessary, to meet a threatened invasion of Texas by the Mexican forces.... The invasion was threatened solely because Texas had determined ... to annex herself to our Union; and, under these circumstances, it was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil. ... The Congress of Texas, by its act of December 19, 1836, had declared the Rio del Norte to be the boundary of that repub-lic. ( Document B).

One of the concerns was o U.S jobs was shifted to Mexico so U.S workers had suffered from NAFTA. This effect may be difficult to quantify, but influence on bargaining power of U.S workers. If firm could step to move jobs to Mexico if labor unions did not comply with their demands. Some U.S. industries have been benefitted to raise demand for U.S. products in Mexico or Canada, creating new jobs while other industries have job losses by NAFTA. It is quite difficult to quantify data on the effects of NAFTA on sector wise because of the other economic factors that influence trade and employment levels in countries. For example: The devaluation of the Mexican unit of money resulted lower Mexican wages standard and norms, which may be taken as source of Incentive for U.S. companies to have low production costs with cheap labor. One can say that trade-related employment due to NAFTA from the lowering of trade barriers, and from low economic conditions in Mexico and for United States to influence in increase of investment decisions and rise demand for

He drafted and signed an executive order that begins the construction for the border wall ("Executive Order…”). This action sparked discontent between Trump and the Mexican president since Mexico has no plans to pay for a border wall that they do not want. For the payment of the wall Trump has said that he will place a tax on Mexican imports the problem with this is that it puts the burden of paying for the wall on US consumers and businesses as this tax will rise prices for Mexican products and materials. Seeing as Mexico is one of the US’s largest trading partners it could very well have an effect one everyone in the US. Another executive order that is “in the works” called for 10,000 border patrol officers to be hired to increase the security along the border, just as Trump promised (Valverde). The first controversial order of these particular executive orders is the one that requires sanctuary cities to hand over illegal immigrants or risk losing federal grant money ("What Trump Has…”). In opposition to sanctuary cities John Culberson, a Republican from Texas, pointed out that federal law requires local and state officials to share immigration information with federal authorities ("Showdown Looms…”). However, Peter Markowitz stated in a CNN article that the constitution prevents that federal government from “conditioning funding in order to coerce local agencies into federal service” ("Sanctuary Cities…”). Both

President Trump's goal is to rid the entire nation of undocumented immigrants(Calabresi et al, 2016). Trump plans to send immigrants back to Mexico to wait out the immigration process(Kulish et al, 2017). However, Mexico did not approve of this plan. Trump is trying to pawn a U.S. problem on another country, and it is causing tensions to rise. Trump also plans to use expedited removal of illegal Mexican immigrants. This means he plans to deport people without a judge as extensively as the law will allow it in order to prevent back log of immigrant cases(Kulish et al, 2017). By preventing illegal Mexican immigrants from obtaining the necessary wages in order for their families to be financially stable, the Mexican economy will only plummet more. These people will continue to live in poverty, and the incentive will be even higher to illegally immigrate to the U.S.. It also creates the problem for the U.S. with a lack of a blue collar workforce population for the service economy and agriculture. He also plans on expanding the program 287(g) which, from 2013-2016, led to over 175,000 deportations(Kullish et al, 2017). The program was able to deport so many people because it used racial profiling. The U.S. has come so far in civil rights and liberties just to stigmatize Mexican Americans as illegal immigrants. The only beneficial thing Trump has done in his immigration policy is leave DACA alone.

Change is an unavoidable part of life. For some, change can bring promise and a new beginning. For others, change disrupts what is routine and normal and makes what is new seem strange and unfamiliar. The history of North America has been shaped by change ever since Columbus first discovered the continent in 1492. With that discovery, the continent would never be the same again. More specifically, the Native American tribes who first inhabited this continent would never be the same.

On the eve of their encounter with Europeans, the Indians of Central and South America were prosperous and created complex societies. While being worlds apart both the Central and South American Indians and the Tribes of the Mississippi Valley had similar concepts while having a variety of differences. Both the Central and South American Indian and the Tribes of the Mississippi Valley had religion, economy and art although different from one another they share some of the same basic fundamental ideas.

I even had to do a quick search on the Internet to see what NAFTA stood for. After reading the article, what stood out the most to be was the amount of indigenous people who have migrated to the United States. I did not imagine the amount of indigenous Mexicans living in the United States to be so high. These people should not be leaving their own country just to search for jobs to be able to survive. They should be able to grow crops and be able to sell them for a reasonable price, not have the price of crops so low to the point that they have to go hungry and believe their own solution is to become farmworkers in a new country. While NAFTA has created jobs, they have caused the loss of way too many jobs and the displacement of more people that I would have

A sum of $463 million dollars is being spent each year in the Rio Grande Valley, a biodiverse location in North America, by the wildlife watchers. More than 700 species of vertebrates alone are present here. Being located at the intersection of two key migration routes for migrating birds, wildlife watchers across the world come here to see the 500 different species of birds.

Clearly NAFTA has led to widespread job loss, with more than 200,000 U.S. workers certified as NAFTA casualties under just one narrow government program. Since the 1970's, there has been a steady trickle of