Rise Of Juvenile Crime Cases

In the early 1990s media was portraying juvenile crime as running rampant. It was reported that children were killing old ladies or innocent bystanders. This called the public to question if treating juveniles with rehabilitation and protection like it has been historically done was really the best option. This lead to many states making it easier for prosecutors to file charges against

Juvenile Delinquency has increased throughout the years. In 2008 the United States police arrested about 2.11 million juveniles. Juvenile arrest rates had increased in 2005 and again in 2006. Data show increases in some offense categories but declines in most. Most changes being less than 10% in either direction. According to the data arson at 47% is one of the biggest crimes that juveniles commit. Following are robbery at 27%, burglary at 27%, and property crimes at 26%. Juveniles are creating more problems for parents, schools, and communities. In 2007 juvenile courts dealt with a large amount of juvenile delinquents. About 4,600 cases per day were being treated at the courts (Puzzanchera, Charles).

Over 1/3 of the 11,000 index crime arrests were juveniles under the age of 16.

The juvenile justice system was founded on the belief that juveniles should be rehabilitated from committing crime. It was the belief of the government that juveniles do not posses the cognitive reasoning of adults, therefore should not be punished as adults. The juvenile court was formed in 1899 with the belief that the government needs to play a more active role in the rehabilitation of juveniles. This belief held strong up until the 1980's when President Ronald Reagan took office. The beliefs in juvenile rehabilitation were fading and an alternative was rapidly being put into motion, juvenile incarceration. Juveniles being incarcerated was not

News studies show a number of serious crimes being committed by children and adolescents. Criminologists' see warnings of vicious juveniles with general belief that young people are increasingly violent and uncontrollable and that the response of the juvenile justice system has been inadequate. Reacting to evidence of increases in juvenile violence, state and federal legislators have proposed, and most states have passed, laws that make the juvenile system more punitive and that allow younger children and adolescents to be transferred to the adult system for a greater variety of offenses and in a greater variety of

The juvenile system was developed in the United States about two hundred years ago, with the first court build in Illinois in 1899. Juvenile Justice System was established to reform youth were found guilty of a minor crime. Today, crimes of violence increase even more due to the cause on most cases youth are not interested in obtaining an education and decide to skip school and decide to steal and replace school with violent crimes, such as harassment, reckless endangerment, and burglary. The American Juvenile Justice System is main objective is to work with youth offenders who had been arrested and convicted of a crime.

“The juvenile justice system was first created in the late 1800s to reform United States policies on how to handle youth offenders. Since that time, a number of reforms - aimed at both protecting the "due process of law" rights of youth, and creating an aversion toward jail among the young - have made the juvenile justice system more comparable to the adult system, which is a shift from the United States’ original intent (2008,Lawyer Shop.com).” The

The Youth Criminal Justice Act is clearly an effective bill. Since the introduction of YCJA, crime for youth has been decreasing at a rapid rate. (Show graph) In this graph you can see that since the start of the bill (which was introduced in 2003) there has been a huge dip in “Total youth court cases”. Following that statistic the other categories have notably been decrease along with it. How do they achieve this? The YCJA guides youth. Instead of just tossing them like they are some criminal that serve their time and head off, the bill provides things like counselling and community service to teach them their wrong doing and send them off as useful citizens that's shouldn't be coming in and out of prison constantly. Witout a doubt this would

Teens being tried in the adult court system is becoming more common today. The Juvenile court system was first established in 1899 for teens to be treated through police, court, and correctional involvement instead of punishment. It was handling juvenile offenders based on their youth rather than their crime. Eventually, that all changed when teens were starting to commit more heinous crimes such as robbery and homicide. For fear that these juveniles would be a harm to society, many states such as Georgia, Michigan, and Texas have now made it easier for certain teens to be tried as adults (Tipton 2017).

Between 1960s and the 1980s, attention and speculation began to rise about the concern of the juvenile delinquency and court system. During this time, this era was characterized by distinctly harsh punishments for youths. They were also wanting to focus on providing minors with due process and legal counsel in court. Even though they were trying to provide help to youth offenders, criticism during this time, focused on racial discrimination, gender disparities and discrimination towards children with mental health problems or learning disabilities. Through out the years, crime rates rose and the misrepresentation from the media began around the 1960s and went through the 1980s. Today in America, no population poses a larger threat to public safety than juvenile offenders.

This is beneficial in the long-run, reducing the chances for regression and further crime. As evidence of history, children were separated from being jailed with adults and put into reform school judged in juvenile courts. Juvenile crime since the first establishment of juvenile courts has risen. According to the journal of the American Medical Association, more that 15 percent of crimes were committed by minors in 1910 (Juvenile Crime 585). With estimation, crime would have exponentially increased since 1910. This statistic most likely cause the questioning of the effectiveness of the juvenile courts and its leniency in mid-20th

Should a twelve year old life should be ruin by the serious crime they did, yes they should because they took someone’s life and they should do a lot jail time, it don’t matter because they committed a serious crime and they murdered someone for no reason or accident either way that person that they killed is not coming back and they didn’t deserve to die or anything. I don’t agree with the supreme court they should have young kids do the time at a young age if there twelve years old or younger. Every year the juvenile court in the US handle the estimate of 1.7 million cases of what the younger kids did. The trends in juvenile court cases did not parallel the decline in arrests of persons younger than eighteen. I feel like when the

Juvenile crime occurs when a teen or a child violates the criminal law under the age of eighteen (in most states it’s 12-18). The juvenile system is way different than the adult system. When a juvenile commits a crime there are legal consequences for their actions depending on what he/she did. Sometimes the system can put them in rehabilitation or a detention center. If the offense is minor, the child could be released to the custody of a parent or legal guardian. In the United States if the teen gets arrested for a minor offense the court will usually give a (Notice to Appear). In the notice to appear letter will list, where the juvenile should report, as well the time and date.

Yes, I believe that we have entered into a new age of juvenile justice. I believe this because the court has taken a stance that has gone back to its original goal, doing what is in the best interest of juveniles, while still punishing juveniles for their crimes. I believe that, just like in the adult courts, we were beginning to see a juvenile justice system where small offenses were met with highly severe punishments and large prison populations of juveniles. By viewing the problem that was being created, many judges have taken a stance that due to disadvantages of juveniles, such as in their mental ability, they need to be protected, and not treated like that of adults. While I don't believe we are there yet, or that this new cycle is

Juvenile justice has proved to be as imprudent as it is practical. Snyder and Sickmund (1999) found that as early as 1825, there was a significant push to establish a separate juvenile justice system focused on rehabilitation and treatment. The procedure continued to stay focused on the rehabilitation of a person, even though financial support and assets sustained to hold back its achievement. In reaction to rising juvenile crime rates in the 1980s’, more corrective laws were approved (Snyder and Sickmund 1999). In the 1990s, the United States legal system took further steps regarding transfer provisions that lowered the threshold at which juveniles could be tried in criminal court and sentenced to adult prison (Snyder and Sickmund 1999). Furthermore, laws were enacted that allowed prosecutors and judges more discretion in their sentencing options; and confidentiality standards, which made juvenile court proceedings and records more available to the public (Snyder and Sickmund 1999), were reduced.