MGT 510
ASSIGNMENT
RL WOLFE: IMPLEMENTING SELF-DIRECTED TEAMS.
A CASE REVIEW
RL WOLFE: IMPLEMENTING SELF-DIRECTED TEAMS.
INTRODUCTION:
The self-directed work team is an autonomous work unit capable of self-management. Such team has little need for direct supervision from managers; rather, the manager’s role is to meet the need of the team through the provision of resources, training and encouragement (Douglas & Gardner, 2004). The team is typically comprised of 5 to 15 members who are responsible for performing and managing all or most aspect of a set of interdependent work tasks (Yeatts and Hyten, 1998). In order to overcome the competitive challenge for production efficiency and effectiveness, organizations have focused on
…show more content…
In all, 90 workers were hired including 20 workers from Moon Plastic Plant.
Team Setup and Responsibilities: The SDT model anticipate that workers would view the production process as an aggregate of interdependent job functions that are equally responsible for the quality of the final product. Two teams of 12 – 15 people were set up for each shift. The workers are rotated through all the jobs in the factory at regular intervals, thus ensuring all workers fully understand the production process.
Role of the Coordinator: The coordinator of a SDT will serve various roles based on the need of the team. These roles may include acting as a directive leader, a coach, a supportive leader and as a delegating leader. The coordinator provides the team with resources and information required for decision making. ISSUES AND PROBLEM:
RL Wolfe operates two other plants with unionized workforce. The union contracts at these plants have workers in two divisions: production and maintenance. The maintenance personnel were paid a higher wage than production personnel, and workers lack the flexibility to work across divisions even when simple intervention would prevent shut down of the extrusion line.
Conflict between the line operators and maintenance workers occurs when there is equipment breakdown. Often there is disagreement on the cause of the problem and the best way to resolve it. Lack of communication
Assess the effectiveness of own organisation in measuring team performance against organisation goals and objectives
Working as a team brings various advantages to the realization of work objectives. Teamwork ensures a maximum involvement of everyone in the team, thereby ensuring all participants to share their strengths and expertise, especially through the distribution of responsibilities among group members. In handling tasks, information is shared while each person can learn from each other. In the essence of productivity, group work increases the likelihood of high level of job performance and effectiveness. When the team is well managed, comparing to a person working by himself/herself, team would be able to come up with more solutions to problem at
In every organization, teamwork should be a term very emphasized among all the members. However, a company should have the tools and willing to motivate its employees towards a teamwork formation within the organization. Therefore, the company should acknowledge the correct incentives that are applicable to build a motivational environment where the people feel free to express ideas, and feel empowered to lead others to a common goal; a place where they feel valued and important for the development of the company, and also, well compensated.
A team is a type of organizational group with independent members. They share common goals and work together to meet these goals (Northouse, 2016). The organization where I work has teams at various levels for maximizing the success. These teams include, core teams, coordinating teams, patient aligned care team (PACT), contingency teams, ancillary teams, support and administration teams (Veterans Health Administration [VHA], 2015). Some of these teams have interdepartmental members while others have intradepartmental staff. Successful teams have a concrete blueprint and that contributes to their effective functioning. There are several factors that affect these teams irrespective of the level. The factors comprise the presence of a clear task, separation from non-team members, authority, and stability. The factors like working conditions, team process and bridging the gaps are concerns for the executive level. The complexity of the task, individual skills and their diverse specializations affect the selection of the team members. The team’s meaningful interactions decide their success. Independent teams can help promote friendly competition within the organization and lead to better staff performance. An efficient leader can design and launch an effective team through careful planning and selection of the right members. He/she keeps the factors that affect the success of the team in mind when designing the teams. The patient care units
Part of being a manager for a company is managing teams. These teams can be created for many different reasons and can have various goals put upon them. Companies want managers that are capable of constructing teams that can effectively meet goals and set standards. The four types of work teams most commonly found in organizations are: problem-solving, self-managed, cross-functional, and virtual. In completing the simulation for this course, I will use cross-functional work teams as a foundation for my investigation of effective team management.
In this paper I will discuss how a team leader assesses how big the team is needed in order to accomplish the task assigned to them. This paper will also discuss the how conflicts can arise while trying to meet their goals. Such as which person works better in certain areas. I will also talk about how a team leader resolves their problems that may accure. In addition I will also discuss if team work will take longer to complete task along with some of its advantages. I will also point out some of the resistors to team work like not have the proper tools or supplies. I will also discuss how to be proactive so
If you don't follow the right procedure of maintenance on equipment it can fail causing unnecessary disruptions to the work schedule, or injury to the operator.
Production staff and process workers will be divided into five different teams. Each team will be responsible for the manufacturing of five product lines. Team members will only work on the r specialty line, and rosters will be altered to ensure adequate staff on each line during • he 12-hour production cycle. This may involve changes to staff rosters, in some cases by implementing 12-hour shifts, but will not impact on earnings or result in the loss of any hours of work.
Collaboration dramatically affects tiered accomplishments. A powerful group can enable an association to accomplish mind-boggling results. A group that isn't working can cause pointless interruption, dissolved conveyance, and key disappointment. These days it is relatively difficult to abstain from being an individual from the group. In case you're not on an official group at work, odds are you work inside some in one way. So it's imperative for your own and professional advancement to know your teamworking qualities and shortcomings.
4. True or False? On self-managed work teams, each member learns one specific job and has clearly defined responsibilities.
In today’s dynamic and innovative business climate, more and more companies are seeking ways to increase productivity, efficiency, and provide an organizational culture where innovation and creativity flourishes. Team-based environments have proven to be advantageous and beneficial in achieving this goal. One such organizational approach is self-directed teams (SDT’s), which is comprised of a group of two or more members entrusted with the responsibility of working collectively to achieve organizational goals, with minimal assistance from management.
The Corpus Christi Experiment, initiated by Mr. John Amasi (Director of Production and Engineering) at RL Wolfe in 2004, was an attempt to employ the Self-directed teams at the newly acquired Plastic Pipe Manufacturing Plant in Corpus Christi, TX. Self-directed team implementation has produced a lot of positives for the Corpus Christi plant such as higher design capacity achieved, job satisfaction among workers, lower turnover rates. After 3 years of implementation of Self-directed teams in Corpus Christi plant, 80% to 82% design capacity was met. RL Wolfe’s other two plants with traditional teams are able to meet the 65%-70% of design capacity. Since all the other conditions viz. Raw Material availability,
In the Assistant Directory role they have professional staff that reports all information and how everything is going throughout the work day. Mr. Matt manages the coordinators and has to make sure all of the supervisors are trained so that everything goes smoothly. So if anything goes wrong with specifically intramural sports he is held accountable for all mishaps.
As we begin to form our self-managed work teams this week for the final report and presentation due at the end of session, I begin to reflect on the situations where I have had to be part of a group. Accordingly, past experiences have led me to form a generally negative viewpoint with regards teamwork in both the education and workplace setting. In most situations, group work is facilitated by a single leader responsible for ensuring that all members complete their work to the required standard. Nevertheless, this has lead to situations where team members often become unproductive or dysfunctional. For one thing, conflict – whether it be task or relational – arises between team members and leaders when they begin to feel that they are subject to the leader’s authoritarian behaviour or scrutiny. For another, the leaders responsible for the management of the group begin to feel underappreciated or dissatisfied with the levels of task productivity generated by group members. In stating this, I have experienced both sides of single leadership team management – with mostly disastrous results – where negative team performance ultimately reflected on assessment grades.
A self-directed workforce is where the employees manage themselves and can perform multiple tasks. No need for a lot of middle management, because the employees will manage each other and themselves. A company like PPG wanted to implement a self-directed workforce because it saves them money in the long run. The workers union in a non-self-directed workforce gave them headaches. The workers were only allowed to perform one job task. It prevented them from working efficiently. If a machine