preview

Roadmap Chapter Summary

Better Essays
Open Document

In chapter one, Joel Samaha discusses the road map of criminal procedure. Throughout the roadmap, the author demonstrates the overall guidelines as to how one is eventually institutionalized. The author claims the vast majority of law abiding citizens seize to surpass the first part of his ideal journey. However if an individual is charged, they will undergo a series of five components.
Samaha begins with the idea of in public; ultimately, explaining the general supervision of police officers in society. Police officers are responsible in investigating suspicious behavior in public places varying from public streets, roads, highways, public parks and restaurants. Police officers have the ability to briefly approach and stop an individual …show more content…

Due process is listed under the constitution in which guarantees an individual a fair proceeding. More specifically, the fifth and fourteenth amendment of the U.S. constitution, prohibits all levels of government from arbitrary and unfairly depriving individuals of their basic constitutional rights. According to Rochin v. California, the U.S. Supreme court ruled the evidence against Mr. Rochin unconstitutional and thus not a fair proceeding. The Officers coerced evidence from the defendant without a legitimate authorization and used the tainted evidence in trial. Reviewing the case certainty reveals the importance of following proper proceeding when obtaining meaningful evidence. One little violation can disrupt the entirety of the case. Thus, police training is important in acting appropriately to that of constitutional …show more content…

The fourth amendment commands the use of warrants. As previously stated, warrants usually consist of three elements to meet the fourth amendment standard. This standard is important to uphold so that in fact evidence can be permissible in court. I believe the knock and announce rule is a truly effective procedure because this standard can protect officers from injury and more than likely preserve physical evidence from being destroyed. This is also a valuable tool in preventing a high risk target from escaping the scene. As follows, searches incident to arrest does not require a warrant if the search is in the radius of the suspect. The officer may search the surrounding area for illegal contraband or weapons. Ultimately, to protect the officers around as well as to collect valuable evidence. As for motor vehicle stops, these instances typically do not need a warrant if the officer is to believe under reasonable suspicion illegal substances are being concealed within the vehicle. The standard of privacy is lower because the vehicle is out in public and thus is at greater risk of being searched. Wyoming v. Houghton is an interesting case involving a motor vehicle search. The defendant, Houghton was charged with felony possession of methamphetamine. However, being that the officer suspected the driver of suspicion, the officer had no entitlement to search the defendant’s purse for contraband; ultimately, violating the

Get Access