Rob Portman On Marriage Equality Analysis

In this article, political implications are given emphasis. To begin with, the same-sex marriages lead to a democratic disrespect. Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized the point as he opposed the idea in the Supreme Court (Powell, 2015). Concerning the precedent round of litigation Hawaii, Rosenberg and Klarman’s source emphasis has been a significant negative legislative response in Congress and state capitols (Powell, 2015). Despite that, there were other bright electoral consequences as well. These electoral consequences were very but not entirely

political debate over the decisive issue of gay marriage forces us to rethink our commitment to

Andrew Sullivan is the author of an article “Why Gay Marriage is Good for Straight America.” He is an experienced publicist, and he is homosexual. Sullivan argues that every person has the right to get married disregarding his or her orientation. Richard Rodriguez who is also a famous publicist composed “Family Values.” Like Sullivan, he is homosexual and he discusses it in his work. Rodriguez and Sullivan share many viewpoints related to homosexuality, but they disagree about the appropriateness of homosexual marriage – Sullivan is for it, and Rodriguez views it as an imitation of heterosexuality.

On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court removed the ban on same-sex marriage nationwide. On July 15, 2015, Kenneth Jost published an article named “Will there be more gains after marriage ruling?” In this article, Jost discusses the viewpoints of the general public and argues that there may still be a struggle to gain full rights and respect for lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. The article covers the reaction of the public on June 26, along with politicians stand-points on the subject, and the Caitlyn Jenner controversy. Jost’s main argument is that LGBT people are not being protected by the government, even though they have gained the right to marry.

In an ever changing atmosphere where there are numerous definitions of family, why would it be important to have the right to have an official union? That civil right, to same sex couples, means that they are recognized equally to all other couples in this nation. In “The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage”, Theodore Olson discusses California’s Proposition 8 and its ramifications on the value of marriage. Olson states, “Marriage is one of the basic building blocks of our neighborhoods and our nation”. Same sex couples want to share in this value that having the right to marry gives them. Legalizing same-sex marriage according to Olson would, “represent the culmination of our nation’s commitment to equal rights” (Olson, 76). Having all the aspects of a model family are just as important to all types of couples in today’s diverse

After Mayor Newsom of San Francisco allowed many gay couples to marry beginning on Valentine’s Day in 2004, many Americans became more aware of the issue (Taylor 3). Newsom, a heterosexual, Jesuit-educated son of a prominent state judge, is an unlikely person to support the gay community in this fight (Breslau 40). Newsom was shocked after hearing President Bush’s comments about preserving the “sanctity of marriage” and stated, “I had just taken an oath of office not to allow discrimination. It was pretty darned clear what my obligations

A same-sex marriage is a hot topic in today’s politics and society. Our views are changing each day as our culture is changing. Today nearly fifty percent of American’s support same-sex marriages. We are changing our views to be more accepting of all and that is why party stances on this issue are very subject to change.

"Is Same-Sex Marriage American Enough? Analysis of John Corvino's "Same-Sex Marriage Furthers the American Values of Freedom and Equality" Same-sex marriage has been argumentative topic for many Americans considering many of religious beliefs. Statistics show that homosexuality acceptance has improved over the years. In 2006 the acceptance rate was 51% and eventually the acceptance rate continued to rise to 63% in 2013. John Corvino argues his viewpoint that marriage would make Americans more American by focusing on American values including freedom and equality.

In our nation, the battle still continues over marriage equality. In 2008, the California Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples had the right to get married. 18,000 same-sex couples were married throughout the state. Six months later, voters passed Proposition 8, a ballot initiative, which defined marriage as between one man and one man in California. In the article published by Marriage Equality USA, Prop 8 Hurt My Family – Ask me how, discusses Proposition 8 before it was overturned. Marriage Equality USA describes their selves, as: “A national organization whose mission is to secure legally recognizes civil marriage equality for all, at the federal and state level, without regard to gender identity or sexual orientation” (p. 69). Marriage Equality USA illustrates that Proposition 8 caused Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (LGBTI) individual, family member and straight allies experiences homophobia, verbal abuse and physical abuse. Marriage Equality USA decided to write this essay in hopes that the California Supreme Court to overturn Proposition 8.

In Zach Wahls speech “about family” he talks about the legalization of gay marriage. Zach Wahls attempts to convince his state representatives that they should vote against an amendment to the Iowa constitution which would ban gay marriages. Wahls attempts to prove that being raised by gay parents has no impact on the kid's life. Wahls takes a personal direct and respectful approach to address this problem. While Zach Wahls efficiently utilizes ethos and pathos as well as an appropriate engaging delivery to connect to his audience, his argument is weakened by his logos.

In the article “Marriage Equality is Unstoppable” Sally Kohn begins by mentioning the historical event of United States v. Windsor, and its remarkable influences over the progress of marriage equality. As a result of this event, the supreme court opened the doors for the federal government and states to approve and recognize same-sex marriage. Later in the reading, she suggests going back in time and remembering other historical facts to illustrate how during the years this civil right has been attempting to achieve the right it deserves in our society. However, despite the today day achievements, Sally summaries that there is still a lot to improve on marriage equality and therefore, all who agree with it should continue fighting until its fully equally.

I read the article “Texas case could test limits of gay marriage ruling’, which can be found at http://www.mystatesman.com/news/texas-case-could-test-limits-gay-marriage-ruling/gU9DdXtHwwfTrfjAdt1vZK/. In this article it explains the Texas Supreme Court’s decision to deny same-sex couples the benefits of their spouses as well as the controversy that goes with it throughout the

The political aspects of whether same-sex couples should be allowed to federal and government recognized marriages are a very complex issue. There are basically two sides to the political argument of whether same-sex couples should be allowed to marry. On one side are the liberals who feel that marriage is a civil right that should be denied based on the basis of a person's sexual orientation. On the other side you have conservatives who feel that marriage is an institution in which should only constitute one man and one woman. In this report we are going to examine how the issue of same-sex marriages are affecting our current political environment, how politics is affecting the movement for

One of the most controversial issues around today is gay marriages. Many believe that the media is primly responsible for the idea of same-sex marriages, but when it all comes down to it there are really only two sides; those who support gay marriages, and those who oppose them. Two authors write their opinions on their opposite views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports same-sex marriages and believes marriage to be a universal right, not just restricted to heterosexuals. Contrary to Sullivan, Bennett (2002) believes that marriage is a sacred traditional family value that should be set aside for heterosexual couples. (2002)Throughout this essay, I will summarize both authors’ ideas and evaluate them through their evidence and

David Masci conducts interviews on the topic of same-sex marriage and presents them in the transcripts titled “An Argument against Same-Sex Marriage: An Interview with Rick Santorum” and “An Argument for Same-Sex Marriage: An Interview with Jonathan Rauch”. Masci interviews two people with completely different stances regarding same-sex marriage. He interviews Rick Santorum, an ex-senator and devout Christian, who is against same-sex marriage then Jonathan Rauch, a gay rights activist, who is for same-sex marriage. Santorum and Rauch both spend a great amount of time speaking about the institution of marriage and although they make some compelling arguments, I feel that neither provide an argument that I can fully agree with.