preview

Robert B Palmer Apology For Medea

Decent Essays

In Robert. B Palmer’s article, Apology for Jason, Palmer argues the treatment of the Greek hero Jason from Euripides’ Medea by discussing the context for the time of the play and also the importance of the terminology used.
Palmer begins his argument stating that critics of Greek tragedies, especially those by Euripides, all consistently agree with the notion what Jason is an unlikeable hero. Palmer disagrees with this and brings forth his argument that the 5th century audience would have been more understanding towards Jason than the more recent critics of the 19th and 20th century (49).
Drawing on the the opinions of other commenters such as Bates and Norwood, Palmer strengthens his argument that Jason was not written to be an unlikable character (49). It is at this point that Palmer begins to explain the normal fundamental aspects of a Greek tragedy which are present in Medea, however …show more content…

The Pro-Medea faction, which is made up of persons from oppressed groups (Corinthian women, the nurse and the schoolteacher), are the only group which refer to Medea with language which would point Medea as a gunè, a legal wife to Jason (52). Palmer mentions that despite this language used by the pro-Medea group, Medea shows signs of knowing herself that she is less than a wife by referencing how she was carried off from a distant land, much how a concubine would have been (52). Palmer has done this to prove his point that Medea is self aware of the situation she has put Jason in, thus should understand the circumstances. However, Jason takes responsibility for his connection to Medea and admits that her children are his but adds that he is not married to an Athenian woman but to a barbarian (52). Palmer concludes the issues surrounding the terminology, stating that the different use of language cannot conclusively argue Medea’s position in relation to Jason

Get Access