Robert Denton The Power Of Language Essay

inflict a heavy cost. The authors continue by positing a dilemma that sounds nearly identical to Adler’. They assert that terrorists use a strategy of provocation that is designed to induce a violent response, which will in turn radicalize population and lead to them supporting the terrorists.

The September 11th attacks did leave a mark on the United States. The world watched the media account of the tragic events as they were captured by digital and print media. The author in this article explores different aspects of the tragedy to analyze the both Australian and American thoughts and understanding of the events. She has broken it down into categories: the aftermath of the attacks, interpretations of the attacks, and challenges that impeded existing structures of representation. Questions of how the attack was viewed, and how the terrorist evoked terror and mass terrorism are reviewed. In essence Western civilization was forever changed after September 11th 2001. The events of September 11 did leave something other than

What exactly is terrorism? “Terrorism is commonly defined as violent acts (or the threat of violent acts) intended to create fear (terror), perpetrated for a religious, political, or ideological goal, and which deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants, civilians.” The intent of terrorist groups differ vastly depending on the situation they are in and the message they want to send. Terrorists use violence for many things including: to produce widespread fear, obtain recognition for their cause through the media, to weaken the government, to free prisoners, to satisfy vengeance, and to influence government decisions. Ideology and motivation also influence the objectives of terrorist groups, particularly regarding the casualty rate. Secular terrorist groups

The term ‘war on terror’, first used by George W. Bush in the citation above is commonly used as a metaphor of war to designate the international military campaign that started after the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001 and is still going on today. Even though the expression has later been rejected by the Bush administration as well as Barack Obama (Shinkman, 2013), it has since been widely used in the media to label the political and military struggle against terrorism, particularly directed against Islamic terrorist organizations such as al-Qaeda and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in Afghanistan and Iraq.

There are many things can be seen in the psychology of terrorism. Unfortunately there is not good science on psychological factors of terrorism; there are theories and educated opinions (DeAngelis, 2009). The one overarching factor is the fear with which terrorism is based. By definition, terrorism is acts that cause terror by one group on to another, usually for political goals (“Terrorism”, n.d.). Why people suffer from these fears is related to their psychological behavior. Terrorist activity can be described as “fostering a sense of helplessness and hopelessness, in demonstrating the incompetence of the authorities, destroying a sense of security and safety, and in provoking inappropriate reactions from individuals and authorities.” (Alexander & Klein, 2005). Terrorists themselves are affected by psychological behavior; their own and that of others around them. They may even be affected by the behavior of victims and potential victims. Osama Bin Laden has even been known to admit that in the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda, his

Terrorism has become a central issue in American political discourse, and the events of September 11, 2001 drastically changed the American and international conception of terrorism and the terrorists themselves. This discussion dominates national news stations, radio broadcast, Internet outlets, and has ushered in an era of fear of violence in places previously deemed safe. This fear is aimed at what media outlets and politicians refer to as ‘Muslim Extremism’, and terrorism in America is almost solely associated with the Middle East, Islam, and dark-skinned men. The term ‘terrorist’ has become politically charged, and who is defined as a ‘terrorist’ affects both public perception of real and perceived groups that the terrorists belongs to,

Terrorism, within modern society, has become a common strategy employed by various radical groups throughout the world. The utilization of terroristic tactics originated in Russia during the 19th century as a response to an autocratic Russian system that was believed to be well overdue for refinement. During this time, terrorism remained within its place of origin and was a carefully directed phenomenon. Thus, most acts of terror were aimed at specified targets who were chosen systematically, ensuring the message being conveyed was clear and no harm occurred to civilians. With the progression of society, terrorism has evolved into a more horrific strategy. Evolving from a once directed phenomenon to an increasingly unsystematic style of attack, that can occur anywhere at anytime. This change has caused many to believe that terrorism itself is a mindless act that serves no purpose other than to instill fear within society. This assumption is partially correct, but contrary to popular belief the use of terrorism by radical groups does serve a purpose. By instilling fear within society through violent acts, terrorists attempt to usher change. This is because “Terrorism is based on the idea that the kind of change desired can be achieved only with violence” . With this belief, many radical organizations choose to utilize terrorism as a tool to cause change, as they believe it is the only way to bring about change. Another effect of this belief is radical groups are

Like twentieth century totalitarians, today's Islamic fundamentalist fanatics are convinced that they posses absolute truth. This truth is immune from refutation or criticism. They believe that force and terror are necessary to establish a utopia in place of the current decadent and corrupt world. Unlike the followers from the past centuries, today's terrorists draw inspiration from religious radicalism. Therefore religion marks the clearest difference from the "old" terrorism. Now the need to be heard is not only an expression

The perceived image of modern terrorism is different than the face of terror in the past, due to the increasing use of technology as a means for aiding extremists and terrorist activities. This paper will argue that modern tactics require different approaches from what has been done in the past to fight terrorism, and explore this difference between this past and present technological recruitment phenomenon. I will examine this issue using ISIS and Al Qaeda as a case study, by finding how it effectively utilizes and issues propaganda, therefore influencing citizens to join their fight. What is different

In order to attempt to comprehend the reasoning behind these attacks, it is first important to understand the basis of jihadist ideology. A common misconception is that all persons who practice the Islamic religion sympathize with terrorist activities. Islamic terror groups, or jihadist, are persons who engage in the act of jihad, or the holy war waged on behalf of Islam as a religious duty (Jihad). To start her analysis, Habeck first researched the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City in September 2011. While it is understood that al-Qaeda extremists led these attacks, Habeck dug in further to attempt to make sense of why these attacks were executed. She found that these Islamic extremists follow the life of Muhammad as a model for their fundamentals, but they also base it off three texts: the Qur’an, sira, and hadith. Even though these extremists read the same texts peaceful Islamic practitioners, the extremists focus on a certain aspect is called “Jaliyya.” This term is used to state that all people who have not been informed or enlightened to Islam are blind and ignorant. While these extremists think that everyone who

The September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon fundamentally changed the dynamic of American identity threatening it’s hegemony and creating a space of insecurity thus necessitating a reassertion of state authority. In particular, the 9/11 post-traumatic space required US participation in an ambiguous ‘War on Terror’ that institutionalized racially charged violence through the demonization of the Islamic ‘Other’. The US-led project to ‘save’ its identity serves to permanently etch within the American subconscious a false representation of modern terrorism in order

One of the terrorists’ main objectives is to increase the number of comrades that share their radicalized message. They are especially trying to spread their message in North America. “Acts of terrorism are significantly higher in countries with a free media that report and publicize terrorism regardless of the trauma inflicted on victims compared to the prevalence of such attacks in countries with a state-controlled media” (Laqueur). They advertise themselves in America because the country has a free media that would feature its terrorist activities. The terrorists endured a language barrier in their effort of luring Americans to their beliefs. Anthony Lemieux in his article, Inspire Magazine: A Critical Analysis of its Significance and Potential Impact Through the Lens of the Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills Model, displays their creative methods of getting past the language barrier. Lemieux argues that the Inspire, a magazine that is produced by Al-Qaeda, is one of the creative aspects terrorists used in defeating the language that was barricading them in spreading of their message to the world, especially in North America. Lemieux also stresses that these magazines are published online which is a great forum to spread the message on the digital broadband. His remarks are supported by Harleen

The result of terrorism and the lasting psychological impact on the victims of terrorism have been explored over time. As a global society there is not a comprehensive understanding of the psychological motivations within the terrorist mind. While there may be no definitive answer, extensive research has gravitated towards several theories, including the quest for personal significance. Until the mind of a terrorist is understood, preventing radicalization is an unreachable task. While not all terrorists are Muslim, they will the focus of my topic. Many people strive to be remembered and becoming a terrorist may be how some believe they will leave a lasting impact on the world. This quest can be motivated by many other factors that include

Even though researchers have admitted to the complexities arising during the process of the understand the brain of those who commit such attacks, many have found to focus on groups rather than individuals. The idea of individuals and/or groups having the urge to commit violence antics has confused many researchers. While many have agreed that not all terrorists are psychopaths, they have assessed there is a strong sense of urge to prove a certain belief or action. Beyond learning the individual characteristics it is also revealed that many people are consumed by money, knowledge and power. Therefore through speeches and other forms of propaganda it has made many vulnerable to adapt a violent path. This has led many to explore different beliefs and through psychological strategies has observed the general public attitudes and outlook to establish the best path to take to promote

One question not fully understood, why does the terrorist tend to provoke their opposition with their terrorist acts. This provocation mostly has to do with propaganda in support of the terrorists’ objective and agenda. It is a means for the terrorist group to know if their object is making any impact. It is impossible to answer the question of whether terrorism works unless you know what the goal of the terrorist group is striving for. Terrorist individuals or groups have primary and secondary motives. Their primary motives may be to achieve independence or withdrawal by nationalist groups or the replacement of the worldly law with religious law by religious groups. Terrorist group’s primary motives are generally not common among the groups but their secondary motives are common among all types of