Robert G Simmons Leadership Traits

He was once a member of one of the most respected and trusted professions in the United States. Robert Courtney was born in Hays, Kansas

Overall the book was a good read and touched on some various topics that are discussed in our class.

In Supreme Conflict, Jan Crawford Greenburg provides insightful analysis and assessment of the politics surrounding the Supreme Court appointment process of Justices during the Rehnquist Court. Despite having seven conservative nominees the Rehnquist Court was deeply disappointing to those conservatives hoping to reverse decades of progressive rulings on key social issues. Throughout the book Greenburg describes both positive and negative appointments and nominations such as Anthony Kennedy Clarence Thomas, and David Souter. Greenburg also includes some background on the impact the Warren and Berger Courts had on the Rehnquist and later Roberts Courts.

Suggested use: I would use this book as a full class read aloud. Specifically, I would use this book to hit three main points. First, this would be a good book to connect to Common Core State Standards surrounding topics such as describing the “traits, motivations or feelings” of characters and “how their actions contribute to the sequence of events” (as in CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.3.3). Second, this book might be more engaging to students whose interests are not always hit by other books; this tale of two African American football players would hopefully appeal

A crucial argument left unanswered is if state judges should be appointed or elected? Conflicting views raise many questions about how things would change in the court system. According to the article Justice at Stake, “One of the hottest debates in judicial politics today is whether judges should be chosen through competitive election or appointments. Each side has pros and cons”. Many states elect their judges through a merit selection process or appoint them through a process called the partisan election. Texas judges use partisan election where judges are elected by the people. Another question that arises is if Texas should continue using the partisan election to elect their judges when it may seem untrustworthy. A decision could be discussed on the process in electing state judges such as on the topics of improvements, conflictions, and which process seems more reasonable. Improvements can be made to the process of electing state judges… Overall, the appointment of judges varies by state, but looking at Texas’ past and present justice system will determine whether Texas should continue to elect, or switch over to appoint.

Texas, through hardship war and political disagreements, was finally established as a state in 1845; but the question after finally acquiring statehood was to be how would the judges be selected. Ever since 1876, it has been an issue on whether judicial selection, the appointment or election of state judges, are even beneficial. Judges are selected through partisan elections or nonpartisan elections through which these elections are determined by financial funds, credibility, and political or non-political party views.

The following report reviews the book, “Courting Disaster: How the Supreme Court is Usurping the Power of Congress and the People” By Pat Robertson. The writing takes a hard look at the recent history and current climate within the United States Supreme Court. A great deal of the author’s work centers on the decisions that have taken place during Chief William Rehnquist’s time leading the highest court in the nation. Rehnquist was chief Justice during the infamous Bush v. Gore decision that sided with President George W. Bush resulting in Al Gore losing the election. The book also examines the political machine that determines whether a justice nominee will be appointed and in light of this process, how political control of the legislature

The civil war had many leaders leading the war. Some of them were good and some of them did not do so well at leading. Some of them had well leading skills, some of the were in the military so they had experience, some of them knew how to handle the war and knew when to quit, but some of them did not have any of these leadership skills. Major Robert Anderson was one of these leaders. Because of his leadership skills, military experience, and military strategy, Robert Anderson was a good addition to the war.

In 2013 Byrne was elected to congress. In Congress, Byrne thinks of himself as an effective legislator by successfully supporting people 's local interests. Byrne has worked really hard to support the local industry through

Officer Simmons graduated on January 26, 1981 from the Los Angeles Police Academy. His first assignment was on May 17, 1981 in the Pacific Division and soon after he was transferred to the 77th Street Division on July 25, 1982. On May 1, 1983 Officer Simmons was welcomed to the South Bureau Gang Squad and he would

Directing the nation’s path with their judgement, Supreme Court Justices shed light on the country in troubling times. The role of Supreme Court Justices are vital key to the complex society we thrive in, thus making this role one of the most prestigious positions in our country. From cases dealing with segregation in the school environment such as “Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka” to recent cases regarding affirmative action in universities such as in “Fisher vs. University of Texas at Austin”, the Supreme Court Justices have seen it all.

The purpose of this chapter is to describe the policy-making role of the federal judiciary, in particular that of the Supreme Court. To appreciate the significance of this role, students need basic knowledge about the history of the Supreme Court, the structure and procedures of the federal courts, the nature of controversy over the courts, and the restraints on judicial policy making. After reading and reviewing the material in this chapter, you should be able to do each of the following:

United States judge Irving R. Kaufman once said, “The judicial system is the most expensive machine ever invented for finding out what happened and what to do about it.” Over the course of the United States, the Supreme Court has decided issues which have a great impact on future generations. The leader of this court needs to have intricate understanding of the United State Constitution and judicial system. By holding many different roles in the judicial process,

There are oblivious things in life that restrict us, they are called rules. Nobody prefers to play a game by the guidelines, but there are reasons for them to exist. The purpose is to maintain the fairness of the game. And for that reason, we have professionals like, umpires, referees, and justices who help to maintain the integrity of these procedures. Nobody pays to watch the umpire in a ballgame, but they are needed to enforce the rules. Similarly, a justice is needed to aid a nation comply by the rules. Comparably, Chief Justice John Roberts (Roberts) of the United States Supreme Court is an outstanding example of that. In this article, the author explains why Roberts makes decisions the way that he does even though they are considered constraints by many. The decisions made by justices should be unbiased and non- sympathetic to a particular political party or else the political system will suffer.

There were many different topics in this class that I found interesting such as the creation of cities, the suburbs, and the different types of housing, but the main topic I found interesting was the Tapping into The Wire book. Overall, I think that this book and the stories that were discussed and the problems Baltimore faces were very interesting. The book discusses just a few of the many drug, gun, and poverty problems that have taken over parts of Baltimore, the Baltimore paper and the book were an eye-opener for me and just how bad problems can get. After reading Tapping into the Wire I think that the riots that happened were long over due by how the book portrays the problems with the police. I have since started watching many of the